Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 473–481 | Cite as

Assessment of Parental Understanding of Positive Newborn Screening Results and Carrier Status for Cystic Fibrosis with the use of a Short Educational Video

  • R. TemmeEmail author
  • A. Gruber
  • M. Johnson
  • L. Read
  • Y. Lu
  • J. McNamara
Original Research

Abstract

Many children are identified as unaffected carriers for cystic fibrosis (CF) through newborn screening (NBS) programs. The aim of this study was to improve parental understanding of positive NBS results using an educational video in addition to genetic counseling. One hundred parents of infants identified as CF carriers through NBS were randomly assigned by household to either a genetic counseling only group or a genetic counseling and video group. All participants completed a knowledge-based questionnaire before, immediately after, and six weeks following genetic counseling. This included questions about resources accessed before and after the appointment. Seventy-two percent of participants accessed resources on their own prior to genetic counseling; these participants scored significantly higher on the pre-counseling questionnaire (p = 0.03). Post-counseling knowledge scores for both groups significantly improved after genetic counseling (p < 0.001). Post-counseling scores were significantly higher in the video group compared to the non-video group (p = 0.02). Knowledge was retained six weeks following genetic counseling. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of an educational video and reinforces the importance of genetic counseling following positive NBS results for CF.

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis Newborn screening Video Genetic counseling False positive Carrier 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the families who participated in the study and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Screening Improvement Program for funding this study. We would also like to thank Phillip Farrell, MD, PhD and Audrey Tluczek, PhD, RN for sharing the questionnaires used in previous studies. We would also like to thank Meixia Liu, MS for her contributions planning the statistical analyses used in the protocol and Cahill Integrated Media for creating and producing the video.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Funding

Supported by a grant from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (TEMME11QI0).

Supplementary material

10897_2014_9767_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (44.3 mb)
Online Resource 1 A 4.5 minute educational video about false positive newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis and the genetics of cystic fibrosis. (MPG 45349 kb)

References

  1. Beucher, J., Leray, E., Deneuville, E., Roblin, M., Pin, I., Bremont, F., & Roussey, M. (2010). Psychological effects of false-positive results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a two-year follow-up. The Journal of Pediatrics, 156(5), 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björklund, U., Marsk, A., Levin, C., & Öhman, S. G. (2012). Audiovisual information affects informed choice and experience of information in antenatal Down syndrome screening–A randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(3), 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjornson, G. L., Scheifele, D. W., & Gold, R. (1997). Assessment of parent education methods for infant immunization. Canadian Journal of Public Health. Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 88(6), 405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanagh, L., Compton, C. J., Tluczek, A., Brown, R. L., & Farrell, P. M. (2010). Long-term evaluation of genetic counseling following false-positive newborn screen for cystic fibrosis. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(2), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciske, D. J., Haavisto, A., Laxova, A., Rock, L. Z. M., & Farrell, P. M. (2001). Genetic counseling and neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an assessment of the communication process. Pediatrics, 107(4), 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillard, J. P., & Tluczek, A. (2005). Information flow after a positive newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. The Journal of Pediatrics, 147(3), S94–S97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., Laxova, A., & Farrell, P. (2008). Potential threats to the effective communication of genetic risk information: the case of cystic fibrosis. Health Communication, 23(3), 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, R. A., Shenouda, P. E., Martin, D. R., & Schultz, A. J. (1998). Videotape increases parent knowledge about poliovirus vaccines and choices of polio vaccination schedules. Pediatrics, 102(2), e26–e26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrell, P. M., Rosenstein, B. J., White, T. B., Accurso, F. J., Castellani, C., Cutting, G. R., & Campbell, P. W., III. (2008). Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: cystic fibrosis foundation consensus report. The Journal of Pediatrics, 153(2), S4–S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg, R. S., Billett, C., Zahurak, M., & Yaster, M. (1999). Videotape increases parental knowledge about pediatric pain management. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 89(4), 899–899.Google Scholar
  11. Groose, M. K., Reynolds, R., Li, Z., & Farrell, P. M. (2010). Opportunities for quality improvement in cystic fibrosis newborn screening. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 9(4), 284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lang, C. W., McColley, S. A., Lester, L. A., & Ross, L. F. (2011). Parental understanding of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis after a negative sweat-test. Pediatrics, 127(2), 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, S., Curnow, L., Ross, M., & Massie, J. (2006). Parental attitudes to the identification of their infants as carriers of cystic fibrosis by newborn screening. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42(9), 533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ley, P. (1972). Primacy, rated importance, and the recall of medical statements. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minnesota Office of Higher Education. Educational Attainment Data. Retrieved May 30, 2014 from http://www.ohe.state.mn.us/mPg.cfm?pageID=1873.
  16. Mischler, E. H., Wilfond, B. S., Fost, N., Laxova, A., Reiser, C., Sauer, C. M., & Farrell, P. M. (1998). Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: impact on reproductive behavior and implications for genetic counseling. Pediatrics, 102(1), 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center. National newborn screening status report. Retrieved February 11, 2011 from http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/sites/genes-r-us/files/nbsdisorders.pdf.
  18. Schnellinger, M., Finkelstein, M., Thygeson, M. V., Vander Velden, H., Karpas, A., & Madhok, M. (2010). Animated video vs pamphlet: comparing the success of educating parents about proper antibiotic use. Pediatrics, 125(5), 990–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tluczek, A., Mischler, E. H., Farrell, P. M., Fost, N., Peterson, N. M., Carey, P., & McCarthy, C. (1992). Parents’ knowledge of neonatal screening and response to false-positive cystic fibrosis testing. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 13(3), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wheeler, J. G., Fair, M., Simpson, P. M., Rowlands, L. A., Aitken, M. E., & Jacobs, R. F. (2001). Impact of a waiting room videotape message on parent attitudes toward pediatric antibiotic use. Pediatrics, 108(3), 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Temme
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • A. Gruber
    • 1
  • M. Johnson
    • 1
  • L. Read
    • 1
  • Y. Lu
    • 1
  • J. McNamara
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cystic Fibrosis DepartmentChildren’s Hospitals and Clinics of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Children’s Respiratory and Critical Care SpecialistsMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Children’s Hospitals & Clinics of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations