Effect of Pre-test Genetic Counseling for Deaf Adults on Knowledge of Genetic Testing
- 1.3k Downloads
Empirical data on genetic counseling outcomes in the deaf population are needed to better serve this population. This study was an examination of genetics knowledge before and after culturally and linguistically appropriate pre-test genetic counseling in a diverse deaf adult sample. Individuals ≥18 years old with early-onset sensorineural deafness were offered connexin-26/30 testing and genetic counseling. Participants completed questionnaires containing 10 genetics knowledge items at baseline and following pre-test genetic counseling. The effects of genetic counseling, prior beliefs about etiology, and participant’s preferred language on genetics knowledge scores were assessed (n = 244). Pre-test genetic counseling (p = .0007), language (p < .0001), prior beliefs (p < .0001), and the interaction between counseling and beliefs (p = .035) were predictors of genetics knowledge. American Sign Language (ASL)-users and participants with “non-genetic/unknown” prior beliefs had lower knowledge scores than English-users and participants with “genetic” prior beliefs, respectively. Genetics knowledge improved after genetic counseling regardless of participants’ language; knowledge change was greater for the “non-genetic/unknown” beliefs group than the “genetic” beliefs group. ASL-users’ lower knowledge scores are consistent with evidence that ethnic and cultural minority groups have less genetics knowledge, perhaps from exposure and access disparities. Culturally and linguistically appropriate pre-test genetic counseling significantly improved deaf individuals’ genetics knowledge. Assessing deaf individuals’ prior beliefs is important for enhancing genetics knowledge.
KeywordsGenetic counseling Connexin-26 GJB2 Deaf Genetic testing American Sign Language Deafness Minority Genetics knowledge
Thanks to the deaf and hard-of-hearing community of California who participated in this research. This work was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute (Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Branch) [R01 HG003871].
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E., Fox, M., Dutton, L., Tullis, L., Linden, J., et al. (2010). Deaf adults' reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Baker, M. W., Harper, G. R., Friedman, L. C., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kash, K., Holland, J., Osborne, M., & Miller, D. (1995). Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 17, 73–79.Google Scholar
- Kauff, N. D., Domcheck, S. M., Friebel, T. M., Robson, M. E., Lee, J., Garber, J. E., et al. (2008). Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 1331–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lane, H. (1999). Mask of benevolence: disabling the Deaf community. San Diego: DawnSignPress.Google Scholar
- Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (1996). A journey into the Deaf-World. San Diego: DawnSignPress.Google Scholar
- Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Palmer, C. G., Martinez, A., Fox, M., Zhou, J., Shapiro, N., Sininger, Y., et al. (2009). A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 149A, 1169–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pieterse, A., Ausems, M., Spreeuwenberg, P., & van Dulment, S. (2011). Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: Smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Education and Counseling, Feb 10 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- Professional Standards Committee Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. (2007). Interpreting in Health Care Settings, from https://doi.org/www.rid.org/UserFiles/File/pdfs/Standard_Practice_Papers/Drafts_June_2006/Health_Care_Settings_SPP.pdf
- Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. (2005). NAD-RID Code of Professional Conduct, from https://doi.org/www.rid.org/UserFiles/File/NAD_RID_ETHICS.pdf
- Ross, L. L., & Berkowitz, M. C. (2008). Academic ASL: It looks like English, but it isn’t. Putting the pieces together. Paper presented at the PEPNet Biennial Conference.Google Scholar
- Schuchman, J. S. (2004). Deafness and eugenics in the Nazi Era. In J. van Eleve (Ed.), Genetics, disability, and deafness (pp. 72–78). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
- Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilcox, S. (1989). American deaf culture: an anthology. Burtonsville: Linstock.Google Scholar
- Wilson, B. J., Forrest, K., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., Matthews, E., et al. (2004). Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genetics, 7, 15–24.Google Scholar
- Withrow, K. A., Tracy, K. A., Burton, S. K., Norris, V. S., Maes, H. H., Arnos, K. S., et al. (2009a). Provision of genetic services for hearing loss: Results from a national survey and comparison to insights obtained from previous focus group discussions. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.