Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 423–429 | Cite as

Biobanks: Importance, Implications and Opportunities for Genetic Counselors

  • Alice K. HawkinsEmail author
Professional Issues

Abstract

Biobanks are collections of human biological tissue specimens and related health data. Biobank research hopes to provide novel insights into the genetic component of disease, ultimately leading to a more personalized approach to healthcare. However, biobanks have sparked debate due to the ethical, legal, and social implications surrounding utilization of population samples and data. These controversies include issues of consent, privacy and confidentiality, return of results and data-sharing. This paper provides an overview of the different types and scope of biobanks and an examination of the most pertinent ethical, legal and social considerations surrounding such research, as well as how some of these concerns are being addressed. The paper finishes with a discussion of the relevance of biobanks to the genetic counseling field and concludes that genetic counselors are in a position to make a unique, educated and practical contribution to the ongoing dialogue and direction of biobank research.

Keywords

Biobanks Ethics Genetic counseling Advocacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Professor Michael Burgess at UBC for introducing her to the complexities of biobank research, as well as Ushta Canteenwalla and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of this manuscript.

References

  1. Anderlik, M. (2003). Commercial biobanks and genetic research: ethical and legal issues. American Journal of Pharmacogenomics, 3(3), 203–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, M., Harding, S., & McElroy, C. (2003a). Genebanks: a comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases. Community Genet, 6(1), 37–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, M., Harding, S., & McElroy, C. (2003b). Monitoring ethical, legal, and social issues in developing population genetic databases. Genetics in medicine, 5(6), 451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Law Reform Commission. (2003). Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. Executive Summary Retrieved Jan 20th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/96/.
  5. Avard, D., & Knoppers, B. (2009). Genomic medicine: considerations for health professionals and the public. Genome Medicine, 1(2), 25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Avard, D., Bucci, L., Burgess, M., Kaye, J., Heeney, C., Farmer, Y., et al. (2009). Public health genomics (PHG) and public participation: points to consider. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  7. Barr, M. (2006). I’m not really read up on genetics: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. Biosocieties, 1, 251–262.Google Scholar
  8. Bogert, G. G., & Bogert, G. T. (1992). The law of trusts and trustees. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
  9. Boulton, M., & Parker, M. (2007). Informed consent in a changing environment. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2187–2198.Google Scholar
  10. Brand, A. M., & Probst-Hensch, N. M. (2007). Biobanking for epidemiological research and public health. Pathobiology, 74, 227–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brekke, O., & Sirnes, T. (2006). Population biobanks: the ethical gravity of informed consent. BioSocieties, 1, 385–398.Google Scholar
  12. Busby, H. (2006). Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood in the UK. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 850–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cambon-Thomsen, A. (2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nature Genetics, 5, 866–873.Google Scholar
  14. Cambon-Thomsen, A., Sallée, C., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Knoppers, B. (2005). Populational genetic databases is a specific ethical and legal framework necessary? GenEdit, 3(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  15. Cambon-Thomsen, A., Rial-Sebbag, E., & Knoppers, B. (2007). Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. European Respiratory Journal, 30, 373–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Caulfield, T., & Ries, N. (2003). Consent, privacy and confidentiality in longitudinal, population health research: the Canadian legal context. Health Law Journal, 11, 1.Google Scholar
  17. Caulfield, T., Upshur, R., & Daar, A. (2003). DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Medical Ethics, 4(1), 1–4.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Caulfield, T., McGuire, A., Cho, M., Buchanan, J., Burgess, M., Danilczyk, U., et al. (2008). Research Ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biology, 6(3), 73.Google Scholar
  19. CDC. (2007). 10 years of public health genomics at CDC 1997–2007. Retrieved Jan 13th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.cdc.gov/genomics/about/reports/2007/index.htm.
  20. Elger, B., & Caplan, A. (2006). Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO reports, 7(7), 661–666.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2005). Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 13(9), 1071–1076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Foltz, F. (1999). Five arguments for increasing public participation in making science policy. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 19(2), 117–127.Google Scholar
  23. Genetic Alliance BioBank: Executive Summary. (2010). Retrieved Jan 15, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.biobank.org/english/view.asp?x=1364&id=76.
  24. Gottweis, H., & Petersen, A. (Eds.). (2008). Biobanks: Governance in comparative perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Greely, H. T. (2007). The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 8, 343–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Haga, S. B., & Beskow, L. M. (2008). Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. Advances in Genetics, 60, 505–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansson, M. G. (2009). Ethics and biobanks. British Journal of Cancer, 100(1), 8–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansson, M. G., Dillner, J., Bartram, C. R., Carlson, J. A., & Helgesson, G. (2006). Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncology, 7(3), 266–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman, B. (2009). Broadening consent and diluting ethics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 125–129.Google Scholar
  30. Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., et al. (2008). Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genetics, 4(8), e1000167.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Irwin, A. (2001). Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Kaiser, J. (2002). Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S. Science, 298(5596), 1158–1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public discourse. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385–411.Google Scholar
  34. Khoury, M., Millikan, R., Little, J., & Gwinn, M. (2004). The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(5), 936–944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Knoppers, B. (2005). Biobanking: international norms. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 33, 7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Knoppers, B., Joly, Y., Simard, J., & Durocher, F. (2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14(11), 1170–1178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lunshof, J. E., Chadwick, R., Vorhaus, D. B., & Church, G. M. (2008). From genetic privacy to open consent. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 9(5), 406–411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. MacNaghten, P., Kearnes, M. B., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27, 268–291.Google Scholar
  39. Maschke, K. J. (2005). Navigating an ethical patchwork–human gene banks. Nature Biotechnology, 23(5), 539–545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McCarty, C., Wilke, R., Giampietro, P., Wesbrook, S., & Caldwell, M. (2005). Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank. Personalized Medicine, 2(1), 49–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McCarty, C. A., Chapman-Stone, D., Derfus, T., Giampietro, P. F., & Fost, N. (2009). Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 146A, 3026–3033.Google Scholar
  42. NSGC. (1983). Genetic counseling as a profession. Retrieved January 19th, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.nsgc.org/career/index.cfm#as_a_profession.
  43. O’Doherty, K., & Burgess, M. (2009). Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation. Public Health Genomics, 12(4), 203–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Doherty, K., & Hawkins, A. (2010). Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics, 13(4), 197–206.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD. (2006). Creation and governance of human genetic research databases.Google Scholar
  46. Park, A. (2009). Ten ideas changing the world right now. Time Magazine: US Edition, 173.Google Scholar
  47. Petersen, A. (2005). Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(2), 271–292.Google Scholar
  48. Petersen, A. (2007). Biobanks’ “engagements”: engendering trust or engineering consent? Genomics, Society and Policy, 3(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  49. Pfendner, E. G., Vanakker, O. M., Terry, S. F., Vourthis, S., McAndrew, P. E., McClain, M. R., et al. (2007). Mutation detection in the ABCC6 gene and genotype phenotype analysis in a large international case series affected by pseudoxanthoma elasticum. British Medical Journal, 44(10), 621–628.Google Scholar
  50. Rose, H. (2006). From hype to mothballs in four years: troubles in the development of large-scale DNA biobanks in Europe. Community Genetics, 9, 184–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rotimi, C., Leppert, M., Matsuda, I., Zeng, C., Zhang, H., Adebamowo, C., et al. (2007). Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project. Community Genetics, 10(3), 186–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.Google Scholar
  53. Secko, D. M., Preto, N., Niemeyer, S., & Burgess, M. M. (2009). Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science & Medicine, 68(4), 781–789.Google Scholar
  54. Swede, H., Stone, C., & Norwood, B. (2007). National population-based biobanks for genetic research. Genetics in Medicine, 9(3), 141–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Swen, J., Huizinga, T., Gelderblom, H., de Vries, E., Assendelft, W., Kirchheiner, J., et al. (2007). Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic. PLoS Medicine, 4(8), 1317–1324.Google Scholar
  56. Tilstone, C. (2006). Further plans announced for national biobanks. Lancet Oncology, 7(3), 195–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tutton, R. (2007). Banking expectations: the promises and problems of biobanks. Personalized Medicine, 4(4), 463–469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tutton, R., & Corrigan, O. (Eds.). (2004). Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. UK Biobank. (2009). Improving the health of future generations. Retrieved 15 Jan, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/.
  60. Watson, P. H., Wilson-McManus, J. E., Barnes, R. O., Giesz, S. C., Png, A., Hegele, R. G., et al. (2009). Evolutionary concepts in biobanking—the BC BioLibrary. Journal of translational medicine, 7(1), 95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams-Jones, B., & Burgess, M. (2006). Democratising access to genetic services. Familial Cancer, 5(2), 117–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Winickoff, D. (2006). Genome and nation: Iceland’s health sector database and its legacy. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 80–105.Google Scholar
  63. Winickoff, D., & Winickoff, R. (2003). The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. New England Journal of Medicine, 12, 1180–1184.Google Scholar
  64. Yuille, M., van Ommen, G. J., Brechot, C., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Dagher, G., Landegren, U., et al. (2007). Biobanking for Europe. Briefings in bioinformatics, 9, 14–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Medical Genetics, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations