Publishing a Master’s Thesis: A Guide for Novice Authors
- 3.4k Downloads
Publication of original research, clinical experiences, and critical reviews of literature are vital to the growth of the genetic counseling field, delivery of genetic counseling services, and professional development of genetic counselors. Busy clinical schedules, lack of time and funding, and training that emphasizes clinical skills over research skills may make it difficult for new genetic counselors to turn their thesis projects into publications. This paper summarizes and elaborates upon a presentation aimed at de-mystifying the publishing process given at the 2008 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference. Specific topics include familiarizing prospective authors, particularly genetic counseling students, with the basics of the publication process and related ethical considerations. Former students’ experiences with publishing master’s theses also are described in hopes of encouraging new genetic counselors to submit for publication papers based on their thesis projects.
KeywordsProfessionalization Publishing Journal writing Genetic counseling Publication ethics Master’s thesis Graduate training
This paper was developed from an Educational Breakout Session (EBS) sponsored by the Jane Engelberg Memorial Fellowship Advisory Group at the 2008 NSGC Annual Education Conference.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- American Board of Genetic Counseling. 2009. Competencies. https://doi.org/www.abgc.net/english/view.asp?x=1529&all=true. Accessed October 26, 2009.
- Andersen, J., Belmont, J., & Cho, C. T. (2006). Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 39, 436–443.Google Scholar
- Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
- Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., & Van Der Weyden, M. B. (2006). Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 142–150.Google Scholar
- East, J. (2006). The problem of plagiarism in academic culture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2, 16–28.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1994). The Thomson Scientific Impact Factor Thomson Reuters (formerly the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)). https://doi.org/www.thomsonreuters.com/business_units/scientific/free/essays/impactfactor/. Accessed 1/24/2009.
- Ha, T. C., Tan, S. B., & Soo, K. C. (2006). The journal impact factor: too much of an impact? Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35, 911–916.Google Scholar
- Lester, J. D., & Lester, J. D., Jr. (1992). The research paper handbook. Glenview: Goodyear Books.Google Scholar
- Merriam-Webster. (1974). The Merriam-Webster dictionary. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
- The PLoS Medicine Editors. (2006). The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine, 3, e291 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.Google Scholar
- United States Copyright Office. (2008). Copyright basics. https://doi.org/www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf. Accessed 1/14/2009.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.