Advertisement

Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 303–312 | Cite as

Risk Perception Among Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

  • Robert PilarskiEmail author
Commentary

Abstract

This paper is a summation of selected history and literature on risk perception as it pertains to genetic counseling and testing, with a focus on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, the area which has seen the greatest focus of research. Risk perception is a complex and incompletely understood concept which seeks to capture the myriad meanings that an individual attaches to the experience of being at increased risk. It is now evident that “risk”, as perceived by the patient, is different from the objective, quantifiable risk estimate often provided to them during genetic counseling. What is also clear is that the complicated set of factors influencing risk perception are not yet well understood, nor are the mechanisms the lead from perceived risk to behavioral change in the patient. In situations where specific behavioral changes such as increased cancer screening are an inherent goal of the genetic risk assessment and counseling process, gaining a better understanding of the specific factors motivating change will be essential.

Keywords

Risk perception Risk construction Hereditary breast cancer Genetic counseling 

References

  1. Antoniou, A. C., Hardy, R., Walker, L., Evans, D. G., Shenton, A., Eeles, R., et al. (2008). Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics. Journal of Medical Genetics, 45(7), 425–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2007.056556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berliner, J. L., & Fay, A. M. (2007). Risk assessment and genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 241–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9090-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bermejo-Perez, M. J., Marquez-Calderon, S., & Llanos-Mendez, A. (2007). Effectiveness of preventive interventions in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers: a systematic review. Journal of Cancer, 121(2), 225–231.Google Scholar
  4. Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Oyen, N., Havik, O. E., & Carlsson, A. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(2), 211–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9061-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A., Johnson, J. L., Lovato, C. Y., & Joab, S. A. (1998). Communicating cancer risk information: the challenges of uncertainty. Patient Education and Counseling, 33, 67–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00047-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: a systematic review. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 77–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalmers, K., & Thomson, K. (1996). Coming to terms with the risk of breast cancer: perceptions of women with primary relatives with breast cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 256–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalmers, K., Thomson, K., & Degner, L. F. (1996). Information, support, and communication needs of women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 19(3), 204–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-199606000-00007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2005). The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(1), 55–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decruyenaere, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Welkenhuysen, M., Denayer, L., & Claes, E. (2000). Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: a theoretical perspective. Psycho-Oncology, 9, 528–536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<528::AID-PON486>3.0.CO;2-#.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekwo, E. E., Seals, B. F., Kim, J.-O., Williamson, R. A., & Hanson, J. W. (1985). Factors influencing maternal estimates of genetic risk. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 20, 491–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320200310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang, C. Y., Miller, S. M., Malick, J., Babb, J., Engstrom, P. F., & Daly, M. B. (2003). Psychosocial correlates of intention to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy among women with a family history of ovarian cancer. Preventive Medicine, 37, 424–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00163-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geller, G., Strauss, M., Bernhardt, B. A., & Holtzman, N. A. (1997). “Decoding” informed consent. Insights from women regarding breast cancer susceptibility testing. The Hastings Center Report, 2(2), 28–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3527625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerund, M. A., Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Erchull, M. J. (2004). Beyond medical risk: investigating the psychological factors underlying women’s perceptions of susceptibility to breast cancer, heart disease and osteoporosis. Health Psychology, 23(2), 247–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granader, E. J., Dwamena, B., & Carlos, R. C. (2008). MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach. Academic Radiology, 15(12), 1590–1595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1), 19–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopwood, P. (2000). Breast cancer risk perception: what do we know and understand? Breast Cancer Research, 2, 387–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs, L. A. (2000). An analysis of the concept of risk. Cancer Nursing, 23(1), 12–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200002000-00003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., & Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84, 24–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.1.24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Facione, N. C., & Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine, 38, 388–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2003). Family stories and the use of heuristics: women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(7), 838–865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00372.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leonard, C. O., Chase, G. A., & Childs, B. (1972). Genetic counseling: a consumer’s view. The New England Journal of Medicine, 287, 433–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerman, C., & Schwarz, M. (1993). Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 28, 145–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common sense representation of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Contributions to medical psychology. Oxford: Pegamon.Google Scholar
  25. Levy-Lahad, E., & Friedman, E. (2007). Cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. British Journal of Cancer, 96, 11–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979a). Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 3, 113–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320030202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979b). Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: I. Parents’ perceptions of uncertainty. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 4, 51–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320040108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979c). Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: II. Making reproductive choices. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 4, 73–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320040109.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lippman-Hand, A., & Fraser, F. C. (1979d). Genetic counseling: parents’ responses to uncertainty. Birth Defects Original Article Series, XV(5C), 325–339.Google Scholar
  30. Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1996). Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counseling. British Journal of Cancer, 74, 482–487.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marteau, T. M., & Lerman, C. (2001). Genetic risk and behavioural change. British Medical Journal, 322, 1056–1059. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7293.1056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marteau, T. M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Self-regulation and the behavioral response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1360–1368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., O’Donnell, S. M., Jacobson, K., & Quinlan, K. B. (1998). A descriptive study of breast cancer worry. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 565–579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018748712987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McAllister, M. (2003). Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing. Clinical Genetics, 64, 179–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00133.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meiser, B., Butow, P., Friedlander, M., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., et al. (2000). Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 2250–2257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metcalfe, K. A., & Narod, S. A. (2002). Breast cancer risk perception among women who have undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 94, 1564–1569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Comprehensive Cancer Centers. (2008). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. v.2.2008. Retrieved August 1, 2008 from https://doi.org/www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf
  38. Palmer, C. G. S., & Sainfort, F. (1993). Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2(4), 275–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parsons, E., & Atkinson, P. (1992). Lay constructions of genetic risk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 14, 437–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peters, E., McCaul, K. D., Stefanek, M., & Nelson, W. (2006). A heuristic approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 45–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Price, M. A., Butow, P. N., Lo, S. K., & Wilson, J. (2007). Predictors of cancer worry in unaffected women from high risk breast cancer families: risk perception is not the primary issue. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 635–644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9105-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rees, G., Fry, A., & Cull, A. (2001). A family history of breast cancer: women’s experiences from a theoretical perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1433–1440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00248-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosenstock, I. M. (1966). Why people use health services. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 94–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3348967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C. L., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., & Masny, A. (1995). Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 14(3), 232–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shiloh, S. (1994). Heuristics and biases in health decision-making: Their expression in genetic counseling. In L. Heath, R. S. Tindale, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, E. Henderson-King, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & J. Myers (Eds.), Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shiloh, S., & Ilan, S. (2005). To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28(5), 467–479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9017-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sivell, S., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C. L., Clarke, A. J., Iredale, R., Shaw, C., et al. (2008). How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision-making: systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 30–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9132-1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Fact versus fears: understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (pp. 464–489). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. van Dooren, S., Rijnsburger, A. J., Seynaeve, C., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Essink-Bot, M.-L., & Tilanus-Linthorst, M. M. A. (2004). Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. European Journal of Cancer, 40, 2056–2063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watson, M., Duvivier, V., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Davidson, J., Papaikonomou, M., et al. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 731–738. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.35.9.731.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wertz, D. C., Sorenson, J. R., & Heeren, T. C. (1986). Clients’ interpretation of risks provided in genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 39, 253–264.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, James Comprehensive Cancer CenterOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations