A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counseling on Risk Perception Accuracy
- 2.6k Downloads
This review presents an overview of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy in papers published between January 2000 and February 2007. The results suggest that genetic counseling may have a positive impact on risk perception accuracy, though some studies observed no impact at all, or only for low-risk participants. Several implications for future research can be deduced. First, future researchers should link risk perception changes to objective risk estimates, define risk perception accuracy as the correct counseled risk estimate, and report both the proportion of individuals who correctly estimate their risk and the average overestimation of the risk. Second, as the descriptions of the counseling sessions were generally poor, future research should include more detailed description of these sessions and link their content to risk perception outcomes to allow interpretation of the results. Finally, the effect of genetic counseling should be examined for a wider variety of hereditary conditions. Genetic counselors should provide the necessary context in which counselees can understand risk information, use both verbal and numerical risk estimates to communicate personal risk information, and use visual aids when communicating numerical risk information.
KeywordsGenetic counseling Risk perception Systematic review
This study was financially supported by Maastricht University and performed at the School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri). Caphri participates in the Netherlands School of Primary Care Research (CaRe), recognized by the Royal Dutch Academy of Science (KNAW) in 1995.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Berry, D. C., Raynor, T., Knapp, P., & Bersellini, E. (2004). Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: A further evaluation of European Commision recommended wordings for communicating risks. Patient Education and Counseling, 53, 129–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00111-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Oyen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., et al. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 211–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9061-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burke, W., Culver, J. O., Bowen, D., Lowry, D., Durfy, S., McTiernan, A., et al. (2000). Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 90, 361–368. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000228)90:5<361::AID-AJMG4>3.0.CO;2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clementi, M., Di Gianantonio, E., Ponchia, R., Petrella, M., Andrisani, A., & Tenconi, R. (2006). Pregnancy outcome after genetic counselling for prenatal diagnosis of unexpected chromosomal anomaly. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 128, 77–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Codori, A. M., Waldeck, T., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D., Trimbath, J. D., & Tillery, M. A. (2005). Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14, 119–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-4062-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins, V., Halliday, J., Warren, R., & Williamson, R. (2000). Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clinical Genetics, 58, 460–468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580606.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.).(2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Hopwood, P., Shenton, A., Lalloo, F., Evans, D. G. R., & Howell, A. (2001). Risk perception and cancer worry: An exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 139–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.38.2.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huiart, L., Eisinger, F., Stoppa Lyonnet, D., Lasset, C., Nogues, C., Vennin, P., et al. (2002). Effects of genetic consultation on perception of a family risk of breast/ovarian cancer and determinants of inaccurate perception after the consultation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 665–675. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00401-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Humphreys, P., & Berkeley, D. (1987). Representing risks: supporting genetic counseling. Birth Defects Original Article Series, 23, 227–250.Google Scholar
- Julian Reynier, C., Chabal, F., Sobol, H., Aurran, Y., Nogues, C., Vennin, P., et al. (1995). Risk perception, anxiety and attitudes towards predictive testing alter cancer genetic consultations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 57, 1722–1722.Google Scholar
- Kaiser, A. S., Ferris, L. E., Katz, R., Pastuszak, A., Llewellyn Thomas, H., Johnson, J. A., et al. (2004). Psychological responses to prenatal NTS counseling and the uptake of invasive testing in women of advanced maternal age. Patient Education and Counseling, 54, 45–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00190-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Toppmeyer, D., Much, J., Dermody, J., Marvin, M., et al. (2003). Subjective and objective risks of carrying a BRCA 1/2 mutation in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12, 351–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023905106360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kent, G., Howie, H., Fletcher, M., Newbury-Ecob, R., & Hosie, K. (2000). The relationship between perceived risk, thought intrusiveness and emotional well-being in women receiving counselling for breast cancer risk in a family history clinic. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 15–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/135910700168739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90, 321–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meiser, B., Butow, P., Barratt, A., Gattas, M., Gaff, C., Haan, E., et al. (2001). Risk perceptions and knowledge of breast cancer genetics in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Psychology & Health, 16, 297–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meiser, B., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A. L., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., et al. (2001). Long-term outcomes of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 44, 215–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00191-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nordin, K., Lidén, A., Hansson, M., Rosenquist, R., & Berglund, G. (2002). Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39, 689–694. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.39.9.689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parrot, R., Silk, K., Dorgan, K., Condit, C., & Harris, T. (2005). Risk comprehension and judgements of statisical evidentiary appeals. When a picture is not worth a thousand words. Human Communication Research, 31, 423–452.Google Scholar
- Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, S., van Dijk, S., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. E. M. (2006). Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 688–696. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000245579.79093.86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: Notional Society of Genetic Counselors’ Task Force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-9014-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In T. Cacioppo, & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Shiloh, S., Gerad, L., & Goldman, B. (2006). The facilitating role of information provided in genetic counseling for counselees’ decisions. Genetics in Medicine, 8, 116–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000196823.50502.a4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S., et al. (2004). Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 83–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000018821.48330.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Zoeteweij, M. W., Timmermans, D. R., van Asperen, C. J., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2003). Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: effects of a breast cancer risk assessment. British Journal of Cancer, 88, 1675–1681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warner, E., Carroll, J. C., Heisey, R. E., Goel, V., Meschino, W. S., Lickley, H. L., et al. (2003). Educating women about breast cancer. An intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 49, 56–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.