Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium
This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (2013) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.
KeywordsSexual violence Dating violence Consortium College Bystander Prevention Evaluation Violence Against Women Act
Research was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement U01 CE002668. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had a supervisory role in the design and conduct of the study but had no direct role in the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Research was supported by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through grant number UL1TR001998. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Administrator-Researcher Campus Climate Collaborative (ARC3). (2015 September 1). Retrieved from https://campusclimate.gsu.edu/arc3-campus-climate-survey/.
- Association of American Universities (2015 September 3). AAU climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Retrieved from https://www.aau.edu/key-issues/aau-climate-survey-sexual-assault-and-sexual-misconduct-2015.
- Babin, E. A., Palazzolo, K. E., & Rivera, K. D. (2012). Communication skills, social support, and burnout among advocates in a domestic violence agency. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 147–166. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uky.edu/10.1080/00909882.2012.670257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Basile, K. C., DeGue, S., Jones, K., Freire, K., Dills, J., Smith, S. G., & Raiford, J. L. (2016). STOP SV: A technical package to prevent sexual violence.Google Scholar
- Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report (Vol. 19, pp. 39–40). Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Bush, H. M., Coker, A. L., Davidov, D. M., & Clear, E. R. (2019). The opportunity – VAWA 2013 reauthorization provides a natural experiment for bystander efficacy evaluation. Journal of Family Violence (in press).Google Scholar
- Campus Sexual Assault Elimination Act. The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013. Pub L No 113–4, §304, 127 Stat 54, 89–92.Google Scholar
- Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S. H., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Thomas, G., … Westat, I. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Physical dating violence among high school students--United States, 2003. MMWR: Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 55(19), 532–535.Google Scholar
- Coker, A. L., Cook-Craig, P. G., Williams, C. M., Fisher, B. S., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., & Hegge, L. M. (2011). Evaluation of green dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211410264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coker, A. L., Fisher, B. S., Bush, H. M., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2015). Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214545284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Cook-Craig, P. G., DeGue, S. A., Clear, E. R., Brancato, C. J., et al. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Davidov, D. M., & Clear, E. R. (2019). Mentoring multi-college bystander efficacy evaluation – An approach to growing the next generation of gender-based interpersonal violence intervention and prevention (VIP) researchers. Journal of Family Violence (in press).Google Scholar
- Davidov, D. M., Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., & Clear, E. R. (2019). Using a multiphase mixed methods triangulation design to measure bystander intervention components and dose of violence prevention programs on college campuses. Journal of Family Violence (in press).Google Scholar
- Edwards, D. (2009). Green Dot curriculum manual. Lexington: University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
- Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377-381.Google Scholar
- Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., et al. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2009). College women's experiences with physically forced, alcohol-or other drug-enabled, and drug-facilitated sexual assault before and since entering college. Journal of American College Health, 57(6), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.57.6.639-649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller, E., Tancredi, D. J., McCauley, H. L., Decker, M. R., Virata, M. C. D., Anderson, H. A., et al. (2013). One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: A cluster randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moynihan, M. M., Banyard, V. L., Arnold, J. S., Eckstein, R. P., & Stapleton, J. G. (2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.502195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research Grants & Funding. Single IRB Policy for Multi-site Research (2018, January 8). Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/single-irb-policy-multi-site-research.htm.
- Orchowski, L. M., Edwards, K. M., Hollander, J. A., Banyard, V. L., Senn, C. Y., & Gidycz, C. A. (2018). Integrating sexual assault resistance, bystander, and Men’s social norms strategies to prevent sexual violence on college campuses: A call to action. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018789153.
- Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., et al. (2013). Sexual assault resistance education for university women: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SARE trial). BMC Women's Health, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-13-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- University of Kentucky Office of Research Intergrity. (2018). Reliance standard operating procedures. Lexington, KY 2019.Google Scholar
- Violence Against Women Act, §§ 42–13701-14040 (1994).Google Scholar