Advertisement

Young people’s Constructions of their Experiences of Parental Domestic Violence: A Discursive Analysis’

  • Catherine M. Naughton
  • Aisling T. O’Donnell
  • Orla T. Muldoon
Original Article

Abstract

This exploratory and formative study draws from discursive psychology to gain insights into how young people construct their experiences of parental domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and how they claim to understand the occurrence of DVA within their home. Data from interviews with 13 young people (18–26 years old) who reported DVA in their families of origin were analyzed using a discursive psychological approach. Analysis revealed two interrelated themes. Theme 1, ‘“How it was”: constructions of DVA’ identified that the young people had difficulty in recognizing psychological aspects of this phenomenon as DVA. However, as these behaviors also deviated from the normative expectations of intra-parental behaviors, the occurrence of psychological DVA led to ambiguity and confusion. Paradoxically, the occurrence of extreme physical DVA was readily recognized as DVA, and this worked to facilitate disclosure, discussion, and help-seeking. Theme 2, ‘Barriers and facilitators to talking with mothers about DVA’, identified how young people’s reported perceptions of their mother’s role in DVA were related to the likelihood that they had conversations about DVA with their mothers. The occurrence of extreme physical DVA, which unambiguously placed responsibility for the DVA with the perpetrator, who in the cases presented here were male, was reported to enable conversations around DVA between the young people and their mothers. Findings suggest a need to adapt discourses to make understandings of the psychological aspect of DVA more accessible to young people, so they can name and make sense of their experiences.

Keywords

Child exposure to domestic violence Young people Discursive psychology Construction Domestic violence and abuse Physical violence Psychological abuse 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Berns, N. (1999). "my problem and how I solved it": Domestic violence in women's magazines. Sociological Quarterly, 40(1), 85–108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb02359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billig, M. (1977). The new social psychology and ‘fascism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(4), 393–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonzaier, F., & De la Rey, C. (2004). Woman abuse: The construction of gender in women and men's narratives of violence. South Africa Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 443–463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, F., Wendt, S., & Moulding, N. (2015). Growing up in domestic violence: What does maternal protectiveness mean? Qualitative Social Work, 14(3), 399–415.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325014547251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley, H., Holt, S., & Whelan, S. (2007). Listen to me! Children's experiences of domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 16(5), 296–310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/car.995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaghan, J. E., Alexander, J. H., Sixsmith, J., & Fellin, L. C. (2015). Beyond “witnessing” children’s experiences of coercive control in domestic violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(10), 1551–1581.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cater, A. K., Miller, L. E., Howell, K. H., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2015). Childhood exposure to intimate partner violence and adult mental health problems: Relationships with gender and age of exposure. Journal of Family Violence, 30(7), 875–886.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9703-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like it isn't: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 499–526.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edleson, J., Shin, N., & Armendariz, K. (2008). Measuring children's exposure to domestic violence: The development and testing of the child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV) scale. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(5), 502–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 425–435.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2005). 11 discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–259). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enander, V. (2010). “A fool to keep staying”: Battered women labeling themselves stupid as an expression of gendered shame. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 5–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209353577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham-Bermann, S. A., Lynch, S., Banyard, V., DeVoe, E. R., & Halabu, H. (2007). Community-based intervention for children exposed to intimate partner violence: An efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 199–209.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham-Bermann, S. A., Kulkarni, M. R., & Kanukollu, S. (2011). Is disclosure therapeutic for children following exposure to traumatic violence? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(5), 1056–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grych, J., Harold, G., & Miles, C. (2003). A prospective investigation of appraisals as mediators of the link between interparental conflict and child adjustment. Child Development, 74(4), 1176–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grych, J., Hamby, S., & Banyard, V. (2015). The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 343–354.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardt, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal Child Psychology Psychiatry, 45(2), 260–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haselschwerdt, M. L., Hlavaty, K., Carlson, C., Schneider, M., Maddox, L., & Skipper, M. (2016). Heterogeneity within domestic violence exposure young adults’ retrospective experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651625.
  21. Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. (1984). Transcript notation. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ix–xvi.Google Scholar
  22. Howell, K. H., Cater, A. K., Miller-Graff, L. E., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2015). The process of reporting and receiving support following exposure to intimate partner violence during childhood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2886–2907.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphreys, C., Thiara, R. K., & Skamballis, A. (2010). Readiness to change: Mother–child relationship and domestic violence intervention. British Journal of Social Work, 41(1), 166–184.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Insetta, E. R., Akers, A. Y., Miller, E., Yonas, M. A., Burke, J. G., Hintz, L., & Chang, J. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence victims as mothers: Their messages and strategies for communicating with children to break the cycle of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(4), 703–724.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514535264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Izaguirre, A., & Cater, Å. (2016). Child witnesses to intimate partner violence their descriptions of talking to people about the violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516639256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jouriles, E. N., & McDonald, R. (2015). Intimate partner violence, coercive control, and child adjustment problems. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(3), 459–474.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514535099.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, E. (2015a). Beyond the physical incident model: How children living with domestic violence are harmed by and resist regimes of coercive control. Child Abuse Review, 25(1), 46–59.  https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katz, E. (2015b). Recovery-promoters: Ways in which children and mothers support one another's recoveries from domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 45(suppl 1), 153–169.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LeCouteur, A., & Oxlad, M. (2010). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353510375406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Margolin, G., & Vickerman, K. A. (2011). Posttraumatic stress in children and adolescents exposed to family violence: I. overview and issues. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(2), 198–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muldoon, O. T., & Lowe, R. D. (2012). Social identity, groups, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Political Psychology, 33(2), 259–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00874.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naughton, C. M., O'Donnell, A. T., Greenwood, R. M., & Muldoon, O. T. (2015a). Ordinary decent domestic violence': A discursive analysis of family law judges' interviews. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 349–365.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naughton, C. M., O’Donnell, A. T., & Muldoon, O. T. (2015b). Family identification: A beneficial process for young adults who grew up in homes affected by parental intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1249.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Naughton, C. M., O’Donnell, A. T., & Muldoon, O. T. (2017). Exposure to domestic violence: evidence of distinct physical and psychological dimensions. Journal Of Interpersonal Violence. Advanced online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517706763.
  35. Nettleton, P. H. (2011). Domestic violence in men's and women's magazines: Women are guilty of choosing the wrong men, men are not guilty of hitting women. Women's Studies in Communication, 34(2), 139–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2011.618240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology, 12(1), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control. In N. Lombard & L. McMillan (Eds.), Violence against women: Current theory and practice in domestic abuse, sexual violence and exploitation (pp. 17–33) Retrieved from https://1q7dqy2unor827bqjls0c4rn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Evan_Stark_Article_Coercive_Control-1.pdf.Google Scholar
  39. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Towns, A. J., & Adams, P. J. (2015). “I didn’t know whether I was right or wrong or just bewildered”: Ambiguity, responsibility, and silencing women’s talk of men’s domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 22(4), 496–520.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215605918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Preliminary studies for the "philosophical investigations," generally known as the blue and Brown books. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine M. Naughton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aisling T. O’Donnell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Orla T. Muldoon
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  2. 2.Centre for Social Issues ResearchUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations