Work Outcomes for Mothers Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: the Buffering Effect of Child Care Subsidy
Mothers who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) are at increased risk for experiencing workplace instability in the form of absence from paid employment and job loss. In a cross-sectional study, we investigate if experiences of IPV inhibit work stability among low-income women as well as if the receipt of child care subsidies has a moderating effect on the relationship. Using data from the Illinois Families Study, we tested the relationships between IPV, work outcomes, and recipient of child care subsidies in a series of multivariate regressions. Findings indicate IPV is associated with reduced hours worked among low-income mothers and increased unemployment among low-income mothers. However, both of these relationships are moderated by receipt of child care subsidies suggesting that mothers who experience IPV can maintain employment at the same level as women not experiencing IPV with receipt of child care subsidies. Our findings indicate the importance of receiving child care subsidies among low-income mothers and support subsidy accessibility to survivors of IPV. Results of our study are limited in regard to the age of the data, the cross-sectional use of the data, and the lack of a control group that was not receiving any type of government assistance.
KeywordsIntimate partner violence Child care subsidy Employment Work stability
This project was supported by the Secondary Analysis of Data on Early Care and Education, Grant Number 90YE0173, from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The project described was supported by award numbers R25HD074544, P2CHD058486, and 5R01HD036916 awarded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.
Administrative data linkages were developed by the Chapin Hall Center for Children, and survey data were collected by the Metro Chicago Inforamtion Center (MCIC).
- Adams, A. E., Tolman, R. M., Byee, D., Sullivan, C. M., & Kennedy, A. C. (2012). The impact of intimate partner violence on low-income women’s economic well-being: The mediating role of job stability. Violence Against Women, 18(12), 1345–1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212474294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allard, M., Albelda, R., Colten, M., & Cosenza, C. (1997). In harm’s way? Domestic violence, AFDC receipt, and welfare reform in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts at Boston.Google Scholar
- Allen, N., Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. (2004). Battered Women's Multitude of Needs. Violence Against Women, 10(9), 1015–1033.Google Scholar
- Bainbridge, J., Meyers, M., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). Child care policy reform and the employment of single mothers. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404002.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Bryne, C. A., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G. Best, C. L., & Saunders, B. E. (1999). Thesocioeconomic impact of interpersonal violence on women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 (3), 362–366.Google Scholar
- Hart, J. D., & Klein, A. (2013). Practical implications of current intimate partner violence research for victim advocates and service providers. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/244348.pdf
- Hetling, A., & Postmus, J. (2014). Financial literacy and economic empowerment of survivors of intimate partner violence: Examining the differences between public assistance recipients and nonrecipients. Journal of Poverty, 18(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2014.896308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Institute for Social Research. (1992). Panel study of income dynamics: Procedures and tape codes, 1992 interviewing year. Ann Arbor, Mich: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. A., Shook, K. L., Stevens, A. B., Kleppner, P., Lewis, J., & Riger, S. (2000). Work, welfare and well-being: An independent look at welfare reform in Illinois. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
- Logan, T. K., Shannon, L., Cole, J., Swanberg, J. (2007). Partner stalking and implications for women's employment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(3), 268–291.Google Scholar
- McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., & Watson, K. (2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women's safety. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 51–68.Google Scholar
- Pavetti, L. (2018). Evidence Doesn’t Support Claims of Success of TANF Work Requirements. Center on budget and policy priorities. DC: Washington.Google Scholar
- Shepard, M., & Pence, E. (1988). The effect of battering on the employment status of women. Affilia, 3(2), 55–61.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. W. (2001). Abuse and work among poor women: Evidence from Washington State. Research in Labor Economics, 20, 67–102.Google Scholar
- Tolman, R. M., & Rosen, D. (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of women receiving welfare: Mental health, substance dependence, and economic well-being. Violence Against Women, 7(2), 141–158.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Labor, & Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Survey of Workplace Violence Prevention, 2005. D.C.: Washington.Google Scholar