Advertisement

The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 425–447 | Cite as

Promising as Doxastic Entrustment

  • Jorah DannenbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

I present a novel way to think about promising: Promising as Doxastic Entrustment. The main idea is that promising is inviting another to entrust her belief to you, and that taking a promiser’s word is freely choosing to accept this invitation. I explicate this through considering the special kind of reason for belief issued by a promiser: a reason whose rational status depends both on the will of the promiser to provide it, and on the will of the promisee to accept it. Though this may seem to raise worries about believing at will, I show how such concerns can be navigated. I then argue that the view provides a rich, attractive understanding of the interpersonal bond forged through promising. According to the Doxastic Entrustment view, that bond results from freely given trust, in exchange for freely assumed responsibility for what is entrusted: namely, a bit of the promisee’s own mind.

Keywords

Promising Trust Word-giving Word-taking Responsibility Testimony 

Notes

References

  1. Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and Antitrust. Ethics 96(2): 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, Judith. 1987. Trust and Rationality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burge, Tyler. 1993. Content Preservation. Philosophical Review 102(4): 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dannenberg, Jorah. 2015. Promising ourselves, promising others. The Journal of Ethics 19(2): 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dannenberg, Jorah. 2017. Promising by Right. Philosophers’ Imprint.Google Scholar
  6. Dannenberg, Jorah. 2019. Serving Two Masters: Ethics, Epistemology, and Taking People at their Word. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-18.Google Scholar
  7. Faulkner, Paul. 2007. On Telling and Trusting. Mind 116(464): 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedrich, Daniel, and Nicholas Southwood. 2011. Promises and Trust. In Promises and Agreement: Philosophical Essays, ed. Hanoch Sheinman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Holton, Richard. 1994. Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72(1): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinchman, Edward. 2005. Telling as Inviting to Trust. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(3): 562–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keren, Arnon. 2012. On the Alleged Perversity of the Evidential View of Testimony. Analysis 72(4): 700–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolodny, Niko, and R. Jay Wallace. 2003. Promises and Practices Revisited. Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(2): 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawlor, Krista. 2013. Assurance: An Austinian View of Knowledge and Knowledge Claims. Oxford: OUP Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacCormack, Neil. 1972. Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marusic, Berislav. 2015. Evidence and Agency Norms of Belief for Promising and Resolving. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMyler, Benjamin. 2011. Testimony, Trust, and Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Migotti, Mark. 2003. All Kinds of Promises. Ethics 114(1): 60–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moran, Richard 2005. Getting Told and Being Believed, Philosophers’ Imprint.Google Scholar
  20. Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1967. On the genealogy of morals. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Owens, David. 2012. Shaping the Normative Landscape. Oxford: OUP Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pierce, Charles. 1934. Belief and Judgment. In Collected Papers, vol. V, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  23. Prichard, Harold A. 2002. The Obligation to Keep a Promise. Moral Writings, 257–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, Angus. 1986. Why Do We Believe What We Are Told? Ratio 1: 69–88.Google Scholar
  26. Roth, Abraham Sesshu. 2016. Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation. Ethics 127(1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. New York: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. 2008. Promising, Intimate Relationships, and Conventionalism. Philosophical Review 117(4): 481–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stroud, Sarah. 2006. Epistemic Partiality in Friendship. Ethics 116(3): 498–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, Michael. 2004. What is it to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle About Justice, in Reason and Value: Theme From the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Google Scholar
  31. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1990. The Realm of Rights. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Watson, Gary. 2004. Asserting and Promising. Philosophical Studies 117(1–2): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, Bernard. 1973. Deciding to Believe. In Problems of the Self, ed. Bernard Williams, 136–151. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations