Synergistic Effects of Volatiles from Host-Infested Plants on Host-Searching Behavior in the Parasitoid Wasp Lytopylus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

  • Chia-Ming Liu
  • Shigeru Matsuyama
  • Yooichi KainohEmail author


Herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) are important cues for natural enemies to find their hosts. HIPVs are usually present as blends and the effects of combinations of individual components are less studied. Here, we investigated plant volatiles in a tritrophic system, comprising the parasitoid wasp Lytopylus rufipes Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), the Oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and Japanese pear, Pyrus pyrifolia ‘Kosui’, so as to elucidate the effects of single components and blends on wasp behaviors. Bioassays in a four-arm olfactometer, using either shoots or their isolated volatiles collected on adsorbent, revealed that female wasps preferred volatiles from host-infested shoots over those from intact shoots. Analyses identified (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate (H), linalool (L), (E)-β-ocimene (O), (E)-3,8-dimethyl-1,4,7-nonatriene (D), and (E,E)-α-farnesene (F). Among them, only F was induced by infestation with G. molesta. When tested singly, only O and D elicited positive responses by L. rufipes. Binary blends of HO and DF elicited a positive response, but that of HD elicited a negative one, even though D alone elicited a positive response. Remarkably, wasps did not prefer either the ODF or HL blends, but showed a highest positive response to a quinary blend (HLODF). These results show that synergism among volatiles released from host-infested plants is necessary for eliciting high behavioral responses in L. rufipes, enabling L. rufipes to find its host efficiently.


Lytopylus rufipes (E)-β-ocimene (E,E)-α-farnesene (E)-DMNT HIPV Plant volatiles 



We appreciate the kind help of the following researchers: Mr. Masao Kaneko (Nagano Fruit Tree Experiment Station) for the moth colony; Mr. Masataka Sasaki (Fukushima Plant Protection Association) for the wasp colony; Dr. Masahiro Arakawa and Mr. Kouki Yoshida (Fruit Tree Research Center, Fukushima Prefecture) for preparing the thinned apples for insect rearing; Prof. Junko Sugaya (Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba) for the pear trees and advice on their care; and Prof. DeMar Taylor for English editing.


  1. Allen BW (1962) Parasites of the oriental fruit moth in the eastern United States. USDA Tech Bull No 1265Google Scholar
  2. Allen HW, Yetter WP (1949) Bassus diversus, an oriental fruit moth parasite established in the United States. J Econ Entomol 42:540. Google Scholar
  3. Büchel K, Malskies S, Mayer M, Fenning TM, Gershenzon J, Hilker M, Meiners T (2011) How plants give early herbivore alert: volatile terpenoids attract parasitoids to egg-infested elms. Basic Appl Ecol 12:403–412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Büchel K, Austel N, Mayer M, Gershenzon J, Fenning TM, Meiners T (2014) Smelling the tree and the forest: elm background odours affect egg parasitoid orientation to herbivore induced terpenoids. BioControl 59:29–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collatz J, Dorn S (2013) Tritrophic consequences arising from a host shift between apple and walnut in an oligophagous herbivore. Biol Control 65:330–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dicke M, Hilker M (2003) Induced plant defences: from molecular biology to evolutionary ecology. Basic Appl Ecol 4:3–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dicke M, Van Beek TA, Posthumus MA et al (1990) Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator–prey interactions involvement of host plant in its production. J Chem Ecol 16:381–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fontana A, Held M, Fantaye CA, Turlings TC, Degenhardt J, Gershenzon J (2011) Attractiveness of constitutive and herbivore-induced sesquiterpene blends of maize to the parasitic wasp Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson). J Chem Ecol 37:582–591. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujinuma M, Kainoh Y, Nemoto H (2010) Borago officinalis attracts the aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Appl Entomol Zool 45:615–620. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hern A, Dorn S (2003) Monitoring seasonal variation in apple fruit volatile emissions in situ using solid-phase microextraction. Phytochem Anal 14:232–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Il’Ichev AL, Kugimiya S, Williams DG, Takabayashi J (2009) Volatile compounds from young peach shoots attract males of oriental fruit moth in the field. J Plant Interact 4:289–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones VP, Horton DR, Mills NJ, Unruh TR, Baker CC, Melton TD, Miliczky ER, Steffan SA, Shearer PW, Amarasekare K (2015) Evaluating herbivore-induced plant volatiles and floral volatiles for monitoring natural enemies in apple, pear and walnut orchards. Biol Control 102:53–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kanga LHB, Pree DJ, van Lier JL, Walker GM (2003) Management of insecticide resistance in oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations from Ontario. Pest Manag Sci 59:921–927. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kobayashi K, Arai M, Tanaka A, Matsuyama S, Honda H, Ohsawa R (2012) Variation in floral scent compounds recognized by honeybees in Brassicaceae crop species. Breed Sci 62:293–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kong WN, Li J, Fan RJ, Li SC, Ma RY (2014) Sex-pheromone-mediated mating disruption technology for the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): overview and prospects. Psyche. 2014:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krugner R, Wallis C, Walse S (2014) Attraction of the egg parasitoid, Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) to synthetic formulation of a (E)-β-ocimene and (E,E)-α-farnesene mixture. Biol Control 77:23–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leopold EJ (1986) Selective hydroboration of a 1,3,7-triene: homogeraniol. Org Synth 64:164–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mills NJ, Heimpel GE (2018) Could increased understanding of foraging behavior help to predict the success of biological control? Curr Opin Insect Sci 27:26–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mochizuki F (2009) Rearing method of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta, by an artificial diet. Proc Assoc Plant Prot Hokuriku 58:25–30 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Mumm R, Dicke M (2010) Variation in natural plant products and the attraction of bodyguards involved in indirect plant defense. Can J Zool 88:628–667. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mumm R, Hilker M (2005) The significance of background odour for an egg parasitoid to detect plants with host eggs. Chem Senses 30:337–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Najar-Rodriguez A, Orschel B, Dorn S (2013) Season-long volatile emissions from peach and pear trees in situ, overlapping profiles, and olfactory attraction of an oligophagous fruit moth in the laboratory. J Chem Ecol 39:418–429. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nurkomar I, Pudjianto MS, Buchori D, Matsuyama S, Taylor DM, Kainoh Y (2017) (E,E)-α-Farnesene as a host-induced plant volatile that attracts Apanteles taragamae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to host-infested cucumber plants. Biocontrol Sci Tech 28:34–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira CM, Auad AM, Mendes SM, Frizzas MR (2013) Economic impact of exotic insect pests in Brazilian agriculture. J Appl Entomol 137:1–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piñero JC, Dorn S (2007) Synergism between aromatic compounds and green leaf volatiles derived from the host plant underlies female attraction in the oriental fruit moth. Entomol Exp Appl 125:185–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at
  27. Rings RW (1970) Economic aspects of the biology and control of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta Busck, in the United States. Ohio J Sci 70:58–61Google Scholar
  28. Rott AS, Häckermann J, Brand N, Vallat A, Dorn S (2005) Parasitoid exploitation of the seasonal variation in host plant volatile emission for herbivore location. Entomol Exp Appl 115:199–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salamanca J, Souza B, Rodriguez-Saona C (2018) Cascading effects of combining synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles with companion plants to manipulate natural enemies in an agro-ecosystem. Pest Manag Sci 74:2133–2145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sasaki M, Hoshi H, Kawaguchi E (2015) Seasonal prevalence of occurrence of Lytopylus rufipes parasitic on larvae of oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta in peach orchards. Ann Rept Plant Prot North Japan 66:153–156 (in Japanese. Google Scholar
  31. Schröder R, Hilker M (2008) The relevance of background odor in resource location by insects: a behavioral approach. BioScience 58:308–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson M, Gurr GM, Simmons AT, Wratten SD, James DG, Leeson G, Nicol HI, Orre-Gordo GUS (2011a) Field evaluation of the “attract and reward” biological control approach in vineyards. Ann Appl Biol 159:69–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simpson M, Gurr GM, Simmons AT, Wratten SD, James DG, Leeson G, Nicol HI, Orre-Gordo GUS (2011b) Attract and reward: combining chemical ecology and habitat manipulation to enhance biological control in field crops. J Appl Ecol 48:580–590. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson M, Gurr GM, Simmons AT, Wratten SD, James DG, Leeson G, Nicol HI (2011c) Insect attraction to synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatile-treated field crops. Agric For Entomol 13:45–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suckling DM, Twidle AM, Gibb AR, Manning LM, Mitchell VJ, Sullivan TES, Wee SL, El-Sayed AM (2012) Volatiles from apple trees infested with light brown apple moth larvae attract the parasitoid Dolichogenidia tasmanica. J Agric Food Chem 60:9562–9566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takemoto H, Takabayashi J (2015) Parasitic wasps Aphidius ervi are more attracted to a blend of host-induced plant volatiles than to the independent compounds. J Chem Ecol 41:801–807. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thanikkul P, Piyasaengthong N, Menezes-Netto AC, Taylor DM, Kainoh Y (2017) Effects of quantitative and qualitative differences in volatiles from host- and non-host-infested maize on the attraction of the larval parasitoid Cotesia kariyai. Entomol Exp Appl 163:60–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turlings TCJ, Erb M (2018) Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu Rev Entomol 63:433–452. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turlings TCJ, Ton J (2006) Exploiting scents of distress: the prospect of manipulating herbivore-induced plant odours to enhance the control of agricultural pests. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:421–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vallat A, Dorn S (2005) Changes in volatile emissions from apple trees and associated response of adult female codling moths over the fruit-growing season. J Agric Food Chem 53:4083–4090. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Wijk M, De Bruijn PJ, Sabelis MW (2008) Predatory mite attraction to herbivore-induced plant odors is not a consequence of attraction to individual herbivore-induced plant volatiles. J Chem Ecol 34:791–803. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vet LEM, van Lenteren JC, Heymans M, Meelis E (1983) An airflow olfactometer for measuring olfactory responses of hymenopterous parasitoids and other small insects. Physiol Entomol 8:97–106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster B, Bruce T, Pickett J, Hardie J (2010) Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Anim Behav 79:451–457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woods JL, James DG, Lee JC, Gent DH (2011) Evaluation of airborne methyl salicylate for improved conservation biological control of two-spotted spider mite and hop aphid in Oregon hop yards. Exp Appl Acarol 55:401–416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yildizhan S, Schulz S (2011) Easy access to (E)-β-Ocimene. Synlett 2011:2831–2833. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu DS, van Achterberg C, Horstmann K (2012) World Ichneumonoidea 2011. Taxonomy, biology, morphology and distribution. Taxapad (scientific names for information management) interactive catalogue, Ottawa. (accessed 30.11.2018)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations