Advertisement

Mistletoe Versus Host Pine: Does Increased Parasite Load Alter the Host Chemical Profile?

  • Alba Lázaro-González
  • José A. Hódar
  • Regino Zamora
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Stress caused by parasitic plants, e.g. mistletoes, alters certain host-plant traits as a response. While several physical implications of the parasite-host relation have been well studied, shifts in the host chemical profile remain poorly understood. Here we compare the chemical profiles of mistletoe (Viscum album subsp. austriacum) leaves and host pine (Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii) needles and we investigate chemical changes in host needles of trees with different parasite loads (control, low, medium, and high). Our results reveal that despite the intimate contact between mistletoe and host pine, their chemical profiles differed significantly, revealing extremely low concentrations of defense compounds (including a complete lack of terpenes) and high levels of N concentrations in mistletoe leaves. On the other hand, parasitized pines showed unique chemical responses depending on parasite loads. Overall, the content in monoterpenes increased with parasitism. Higher parasitized pines produced higher amounts of defense compounds (phenols and condensed tannins) than less parasitized trees, but amounts in samples of the same year did not significantly differ between parasitized and unparasitized pines. Highly parasitized pines accumulated less N than pines with other parasite loads. The strongest response was found in sesqui- and diterpenes, which were at lower levels in pines under medium and high parasitism. Chemical responses of pines to mistletoe parasitism resembled reactions to other kinds of stress. Low levels induced reactions resembling those against drought stress, while medium and high parasitism elicited responses comparable to those against burning and defoliation.

Keywords

Hemiparasite Defense compounds Terpenes Chemical responses Stressors Viscum album Plant-plant interactions Parasitic plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Andalusian Environmental Council, Junta de Andalucía and the Directors of the Sierra de Baza Natural Park provided permission for field work. R. Ruiz-Puche helped us with field sampling and Susana Hitos in laboratory processing of samples. José Miguel Ramos processed and identified all terpenoid compounds at facilities of CIC. D. Nesbitt checked the English version of this manuscript. This study was supported by project CLAVINOVA CGL2011-29910 from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and FPI grant BES-2012-057125 to ALG from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Supplementary material

10886_2018_1039_MOESM1_ESM.docx (135 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 135 kb)
10886_2018_1039_MOESM2_ESM.docx (259 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 259 kb)

References

  1. Achotegui-Castells A, Llusià J, Hódar JA, Peñuelas J (2013) Needle terpene concentrations and emissions of two coexisting subspecies of scots pine attacked by the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa). Acta Physiol Plant 35(10):3047–3058Google Scholar
  2. Adams RP (2007) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy, 4th edn. Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol StreamGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE (2012) The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot 63(10):3523–3544Google Scholar
  4. Aukema JE (2003) Vectors, viscin, and Viscaceae: mistletoes as parasites, mutualists, and resources. Front Ecol Environ 1(4):212–219Google Scholar
  5. Briggs J (2011) Mistletoe (Viscum album): a brief review of its local status with recent observations on its insects associations and conservation problems. Proc Cotteswold Nat Fld Club 45:181–193Google Scholar
  6. Camarero JJ, Linares JC, Sangüesa-Barreda G, Sánchez-Salguero R, Gazol A, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Carreira JA (2017) The multiple causes of forest decline in Spain: drought, historical logging, competition and biotic stressors. In: Amoroso M, Daniels L, Baker P, Camarero J (eds) Dendroecology. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 231. Springer, Cham, pp 307–323Google Scholar
  7. Cannac M, Pasqualini V, Barboni T, Morandini F, Ferrat L (2009a) Phenolic compounds of Pinus laricio needles: a bioindicator of the effects of prescribed burning in function of season. Sci Total Environ 407(15):4542–4548Google Scholar
  8. Cannac M, Barboni T, Ferrat L, Bighelli A, Castola V, Costa J, Trecul D, Morandini F, Pasqualini V (2009b) Oleoresin flow and chemical composition of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra subsp. laricio) in response to prescribed burnings. For Ecol Manag 257(4):1247–1254Google Scholar
  9. Carrillo-Gavilán A, Moreira X, Zas R, Vila M, Sampedro L (2012) Early resistance of alien and native pines against two native generalist insect herbivores: no support for the natural enemy hypothesis. Funct Ecol 26(1):283–293Google Scholar
  10. CMAOT (2008) Usos del suelo y coberturas vegetales en Andalucía, por Espacio Natural Protegido, 2007. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Junta de Andalucía, Seville. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/web/Bloques_Tematicos/Estadisticas_e_Indicadores/Estadisticas_Oficiales_de_la_Consejeria_de_Medio_Ambiente/SueloUso/usoscob_enp%2D%2D2007.xls. Accessed 23 Mar 2018
  11. CMAOT (2016) Precipitaciones y temperaturas medias anuales en grandes áreas geográficas de Andalucía, 1995-2016. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Junta de Andalucía, Seville. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/vem/?c=Tabla/indicador/2240. Accessed 23 Mar 2018
  12. Deforce K, Bastiaens J, Van Neer W, Ervynck A, Lentacker A, Sergant J, Crombé P (2013) Wood charcoal and seeds as indicators for animal husbandry in a wetland site during the late mesolithic–early neolithic transition period (Swifterbant culture, ca. 4600–4000 b. c.) in NW Belgium. Veg Hist Archaeobotany 22(1):51–60Google Scholar
  13. Dobbertin M, Rigling A (2006) Pine mistletoe (Viscum album ssp. austriacum) contributes to scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) mortality in the Rhone valley of Switzerland. For Pathol 36(5):309–322Google Scholar
  14. Ehleringer JR, Schulze ED, Ziegler H, Lange OL, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR (1985) Xylem-tapping mistletoes: water or nutrient parasites. Science 227(4693):1479–1481Google Scholar
  15. Ehleringer JR, Cook CS, Tieszen LL (1986) Comparative water use and nitrogen relationships in a mistletoe and its host. Oecologia 68(2):279–284Google Scholar
  16. Fisher JT (1983) Water relations of mistletoes and their hosts. In: Calder M, Bernhardt P (eds) The biology of mistletoes. Academic, Sydney, pp 161–184Google Scholar
  17. Gershenzon J (1994) Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J Chem Ecol 20(6):1281–1328Google Scholar
  18. Guada G, Camarero JJ, Sánchez-Salguero R, Cerrillo RMN (2016) Limited growth recovery after drought-induced forest dieback in very defoliated trees of two pine species. Front Plant Sci 7Google Scholar
  19. Hartley SE, Green JP, Massey FP, Press MC, Stewart AJ, John EA (2015) Hemiparasitic plant impacts animal and plant communities across four trophic levels. Ecology 96(9):2408–2416Google Scholar
  20. Hejcman M, Hejcmanová P, Stejskalová M, Pavlů V (2014) Nutritive value of winter-collected annual twigs of main European woody species, mistletoe and ivy and its possible consequences for winter foddering of livestock in prehistory. The Holocene 24(6):659–667Google Scholar
  21. Hódar JA, Palo RT (1997) Feeding by vertebrate herbivores in a chemically heterogeneous environment. Ecoscience 4(3):304–310Google Scholar
  22. Hódar JA, Zamora R, Castro J, Baraza E (2004) Feast and famine: previous defoliation limiting survival of pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa in scots pine Pinus sylvestris. Acta Oecol 26(3):203–210Google Scholar
  23. Hódar JA, Torres-Muros L, Zamora R, Pérez-Luque AJ, Senhadji K (2015) No evidence of induced defence after defoliation in three pine species against an expanding pest, the pine processionary moth. For Ecol Manag 356:166–172Google Scholar
  24. Ioannou E, Koutsaviti A, Tzakou O, Roussis V (2014) The genus Pinus: a comparative study on the needle essential oil composition of 46 pine species. Phytochem Rev 13(4):741–768Google Scholar
  25. Kainulainen P, Oksanen J, Palomäki V, Holopainen JK, Holopainen T (1992) Effect of drought and waterlogging stress on needle monoterpenes of Picea abies. Can J Bot 70(8):1613–1616Google Scholar
  26. Karban R, Baldwin IT (eds) (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Keeling CI, Bohlmann J (2006) Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol 170(4):657–675Google Scholar
  28. Klutsch JG, Shamoun SF, Erbilgin N (2017) Drought stress leads to systemic induced susceptibility to a nectrotrophic fungus associated with mountain pine beetle in Pinus banksiana seedlings. PLoS One 12(12):e0189203PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kraus TE, Dahlgren RA, Zasoski RJ (2003) Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems-a review. Plant Soil 256(1):41–66Google Scholar
  30. Kühn M, Maier U, Herbig C, Ismail-Meyer K, Le Bailly M, Wick L (2013) Methods for the examination of cattle, sheep and goat dung in prehistoric wetland settlements with examples of the sites Alleshausen-Täschenwiesen and Alleshausen-Grundwiesen (around cal 2900 BC) at Lake Federsee, south-West Germany. Environ Archaeol 18(1):43–57Google Scholar
  31. Kuijt J (1955) Dwarf mistletoes. Bot Rev 21(10):569–619Google Scholar
  32. Lavoir AV, Ormeño E, Pasqualini V, Ferrat L, Greff S, Lecareux C, Vila B, Mévy JP, Fernández C (2013) Does prescribed burning affect leaf secondary metabolites in pine stands? J Chem Ecol 39(3):398–412Google Scholar
  33. Lázaro-González A, Hódar JA, Zamora R (2017) Do the arthropod communities on a parasitic plant and its hosts differ? Eur J Entomol 114(1):215–221Google Scholar
  34. Litvak ME, Monson RK (1998) Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory. Oecologia 114(4):531–540Google Scholar
  35. Llusià J, Peñuelas J (1998) Changes in terpene content and emission in potted Mediterranean woody plants under severe drought. Can J Bot 76(8):1366–1373Google Scholar
  36. Llusià J, Peñuelas J (2000) Seasonal patterns of terpene content and emission from seven Mediterranean woody species in field conditions. Am J Bot 87(1):133–140PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Llusià J, Peñuelas J, Alessio GA, Estiarte M (2006) Seasonal contrasting changes of foliar concentrations of terpenes and other volatile organic compound in four dominant species of a Mediterranean shrubland submitted to a field experimental drought and warming. Physiol Plant 127(4):632–649Google Scholar
  38. López-Sáez JA, Sanz de Bremond C (1992) Viscum album L. y sus hospedantes en la Península Ibérica. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal. Plagas 18(4):817–825Google Scholar
  39. Marko MD, Stermitz FR (1997) Transfer of alkaloids from Delphinium to Castilleja via root parasitism. Norditerpenoid alkaloid analysis by electrospray mass spectrometry. Biochem Syst Ecol 25(4):279–285Google Scholar
  40. Mattson WJ Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11(1):119–161Google Scholar
  41. McCullough DG, Kulman HM (1991) Differences in foliage quality of young jack pine (Pinus banksiana lamb.) on burned and clearcut sites: effects on jack pine budworm (Choristoneura pinus pinus freeman). Oecologia 87(1):135–145Google Scholar
  42. Mellado A, Zamora R (2014) Linking safe sites for recruitment with host-canopy heterogeneity: the case of a parasitic plant, Viscum album subsp. austriacum (Viscaceae). Am J Bot 101(6):957–964Google Scholar
  43. Mellado A, Zamora R (2017) Parasites structuring ecological communities: the mistletoe footprint in Mediterranean pine forests. Funct Ecol 31:2167–2176Google Scholar
  44. Mellado A, Morillas L, Gallardo A, Zamora R (2016) Temporal dynamic of parasite-mediated linkages between the forest canopy and soil processes and the microbial community. New Phytol 211(4):1382–1392Google Scholar
  45. Mole S, Waterman PG (1986) Tannic acid and proteolytic enzymes: enzyme inhibition or substrate deprivation? Phytochemistry 26(1):99–102Google Scholar
  46. Mole S, Waterman PG (1987) A critical analysis of techniques for measuring tannins in ecological studies. Oecologia 72(1):137–147Google Scholar
  47. Moreira X, Lundborg L, Zas R, Carrillo-Gavilán A, Borg-Karlson AK, Sampedro L (2013) Inducibility of chemical defences by two chewing insect herbivores in pine trees is specific to targeted plant tissue, particular herbivore and defensive trait. Phytochemistry 94:113–122Google Scholar
  48. Mutlu S, Osma E, Ilhan V, Turkoglu HI, Atici O (2016) Mistletoe (Viscum album) reduces the growth of the scots pine by accumulating essential nutrient elements in its structure as a trap. Trees 30(3):815–824Google Scholar
  49. Nierhaus-Wunderwald D, Lawrenz P (1997) Zur Biologie der Mistel. Merkbl Prax 28: 1–8Google Scholar
  50. Norton DA, Reid N (1997) Lessons in ecosystem management from management of threatened and pest loranthaceous mistletoes in New Zealand and Australia. Conserv Biol 11(3):759–769Google Scholar
  51. Orcutt DM, Nilsen ET (2000) The physiology of plants under stress: soil and biotic factors. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker C, Riches CR (1993) Parasitic weeds of the world: biology and control. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1996) Impact of a parasitic plant on the structure and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation. Ecology 77(5):1410–1419Google Scholar
  54. Pennings SC, Callaway RM (2002) Parasitic plants: parallels and contrasts with herbivores. Oecologia 131(4):479–489Google Scholar
  55. Press MC, Phoenix GK (2005) Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. New Phytol 166(3):737–751Google Scholar
  56. R development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, p 2013Google Scholar
  57. Reid ML, Sekhon JK, LaFramboise LM (2017) Toxicity of monoterpene structure, diversity and concentration to mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae: beetle traits matter more. J Chem Ecol 43(4):351–361Google Scholar
  58. Rivas-Ubach A, Sardans J, Hódar JA, Garcia-Porta J, Guenther A, Oravec M, Urban O, Peñuelas J (2016) Similar local, but different systemic, metabolomic responses of closely related pine subspecies to folivory by caterpillars of the processionary moth. Plant Biol 18(3):484–494Google Scholar
  59. Roitto M, Markkola A, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Sarjala T, Rautio P, Kuikka K, Tuomi J (2003) Defoliation-induced responses in peroxidases, phenolics, and polyamines in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. J Chem Ecol 29(8):1905–1918Google Scholar
  60. Roth LF (2001) Dwarf mistletoe-induced mortality in northwest ponderosa pine growing stock. West J Appl For 16(3):136–141Google Scholar
  61. Sangüesa-Barreda G, Linares JC, Camarero JJ (2012) Mistletoe effects on scots pine decline following drought events: insights from within-tree spatial patterns, growth and carbohydrates. Tree Physiol 32(5):585–598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Scalon MC, dos Reis SA, Rossatto DR (2017) Shifting from acquisitive to conservative: the effects of Phoradendron affine (Santalaceae) infection in leaf morpho-physiological traits of a Neotropical tree species. Aust J Bot 65(1):31–37Google Scholar
  63. Schneider MJ, Stermitz FR (1990) Uptake of host plant alkaloids by root parasitic Pedicularis species. Phytochemistry 29(6):1811–1814Google Scholar
  64. Schulze ED, Turner NC, Glatzel G (1984) Carbon, water and nutrient relations of two mistletoes and their hosts: a hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ 7(5):293–299Google Scholar
  65. Shaw DC, Watson DM, Mathiasen RL (2004) Comparison of dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium spp., Viscaceae) in the western United States with mistletoes (Amyema spp., Loranthaceae) in Australia—ecological analogs and reciprocal models for ecosystem management. Aust J Bot 52(4):481–498Google Scholar
  66. Stermitz FR, Belofsky GN, Ng D, Singer MC (1989) Quinolizidine alkaloids obtained by Pedicularis semibarbata (Scrophulariaceae) from Lupinus fulcratus (Leguminosae) fail to influence the specialist herbivore Euphydryas editha (Lepidoptera). J Chem Ecol 15(11):2521–2530Google Scholar
  67. Struwe I, Gertsson CA, Coulianos CC (2009) Insects monophagous on mistletoe (Viscum album L.) newly discovered in Sweden: Cacopsylla visci (Curtis, 1835) (Hemiptera, Psyllidae) and Pinalitus viscicola (Puton, 1888) (Hemiptera, Miridae). Entomol Tidskr 130(3/4):155–160Google Scholar
  68. Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, Blumwald E, Mittler R (2014) Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol 203:32–43Google Scholar
  69. Tiberi R, Niccoli A, Curini M, Epifano F, Marcotullio MC, Rosati O (1999) The role of the monoterpene composition in Pinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary caterpillar, Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Phytoparasitica 27(4):263–272Google Scholar
  70. Turtola S, Manninen AM, Rikala R, Kainulainen P (2003) Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. J Chem Ecol 29(9):1981–1995Google Scholar
  71. Waterman PG, Mole S (1994) Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Watson DM (2001) Mistletoe—a keystone resource in forests and woodlands worldwide. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32(1):219–249Google Scholar
  73. Watson DM (2002) Effects of mistletoe on diversity: a case-study from southern New South Wales. Emu 102(3):275–281Google Scholar
  74. Watson DM, Herring M (2012) Mistletoe as a keystone resource: an experimental test. Proc R Soc B 279(1743):3853–3860Google Scholar
  75. Wellburn FA, Lau KK, Milling PM, Wellburn PM (1996) Drought and air pollution affect nitrogen cycling and free radical scavenging in Pinus halepensis (Mill.). J Exp Bot, 47(9):1361–1367Google Scholar
  76. Zhao T, Krokene P, Björklund N, Långström B, Solheim H, Christiansen E, Borg-Karlson AK (2010) The influence of Ceratocystis polonica inoculation and methyl jasmonate application on terpene chemistry of Norway spruce, Picea abies. Phytochemistry 71(11-12):1332–1341Google Scholar
  77. Zuber D (2004) Biological flora of central Europe: Viscum album L. Flora 199(3): 181-203Google Scholar
  78. Zweifel R, Bangerter S, Rigling A, Sterck FJ (2012) Pine and mistletoes: how to live with a leak in the water flow and storage system? J Exp Bot 63(7):2565–2578Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations