Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Sex Pheromones of Two Leafminer Species, Antispila oinophylla and Holocacista rivillei (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae) Infesting Grapevine in Italy

  • Hong-Lei WangEmail author
  • Mario Baldessari
  • Gianfranco Anfora
  • Erik J. van Nieukerken
  • Christer Löfstedt
Open Access
Article
  • 473 Downloads

Abstract

Two heliozelid species, Antispila oinophylla van Nieukerken & Wagner and Holocacista rivillei (Stainton) severely infest Italian grapevines. The volatile pheromones from calling females were collected by solid phase micro extraction (SPME) and analyzed by gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD). Two compounds from A. oinophylla females eliciting electrophysiological activity from the conspecific male antenna were identified as (Z)-5-tetradecenal and (Z)-7-tetradecenal by coupled gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. SPME collections from H. rivillei produced no GC-EAD active compounds but analysis of fatty acyl moieties in the pheromone gland, demonstrated the presence of the putative pheromone biosynthetic precursors (Z)-5-dodecenoic acid and (Z)-7-tetradecenoic acid. Field trapping experiments in Italy confirmed that (Z)-5-tetradecenal and (Z)-7-tetradecenal are essential for the attraction of male A. oinophylla in a blend ratio of 15:100 respectively, whereas (Z)-5-dodecenal and (Z)-7-tetradecenal attract male H. rivillei in a blend ratio of 100:6.

Keywords

Sex attractant Vitis vinifera (Z)-5-dodecenal (Z)-5-tetradecenal (Z)-7-tetradecenal 

Introduction

Several leaf mining insects from the moth family Heliozelidae infest host plants belonging to the grape family Vitaceae. They may cause severe damage to their hosts and seriously affect grape production (Duso et al. 2011, 2013; van Nieukerken and Geertsema 2015). Over the past decades, various pesticides have been used in grape production to control these and other pests, resulting in residues contaminating grapes and eventually migrating into the wine (Andrey and Amstutz 2000; Cabras et al. 1995). Due to the increasing public concern over the safety of table grapes and wine, the use of pesticides is not recommended, especially in the period around harvest when the leafminers may be highly abundant. Sex pheromones may provide alternative approaches to traditional chemical pesticides for pest control in integrated pest management programs (Pertot et al. 2017).

In Italy, larvae of Antispila oinophylla van Nieukerken & Wagner and Holocacista rivillei (Stainton) may cause serious damage in vineyards (van Nieukerken et al. 2012). Although they are considered secondary pests, in recent years severe outbreaks have taken place in some Italian grape growing areas. Holocacista rivillei is a native of the Mediterranean Basin and has always been associated with the grapevine in several viticultural areas of southern Europe. However, infestation rarely reaches economically-damaging levels, probably as a result of the rich natural enemy communities. Local outbreaks of H. rivillei are probably induced by the disruption of interactions between the pest and its antagonists due to the repeated use of non-selective pesticides. Antispila oinophylla is a North American grapevine leafminer invading Italian vineyards since 2006. Significant infestations are commonly encountered in vineyards in newly colonized areas such as South Tyrol.

The compositions of female-produced sex pheromones in heliozelid moths remain largely unknown. Based on a previous field screening test in Hungary, the heliozelid moth Antispila treitschkiella (Fischer von Röslerstamm) was recorded in traps baited with (Z)-7-tetradecenal (Z7–14:Ald) (Tóth et al. 1992). As a substitute for a properly identified pheromone of A. oinophylla, traps for the olive moth Prays oleae (Bernard) baited with Z7–14:Ald (Campion et al. 1979; Renou et al. 1979) were used in combination with visual inspection to monitor its flight dynamics in vineyards (Baldessari et al. 2010). Recently, we reported the sex pheromone from a newly-discovered grape-feeding leafminer, Holocacista capensis, infesting South African table grapes (van Nieukerken and Geertsema 2015). The pheromone was identified as a binary mixture of 14-carbon, monounsaturated aldehydes, (Z)-5-tetradecenal (Z5–14:Ald) and Z7–14:Ald (Wang et al. 2015).

In the present study, we investigated the female-produced sex pheromones of A. oinophylla and H. rivillei. Volatiles from calling females were collected by solid phase micro extraction (SPME) and analysed by gas chromatography coupled with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) and mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient amounts of pheromone from calling females of H. rivillei for identification, the pheromone biosynthetic precursors were also analyzed in an attempt to predict the structures of pheromone components from the composition of the precursors. Synthetic pheromone candidates were assayed by trapping experiments in the field.

Methods and Materials

Insects

Cocoons of A. oinophylla and H. rivillei were collected in late March (winter generation) and early July (summer generation) in 2013 from the wine grape plantations of Trentino Region, Italy, and sent to Lund where they were stored at 23 °C, 60% RH and a 17:7 h L:D cycle. Moths from the different generations started to emerge in mid-to-late May and late July, respectively. Newly emerged moths were separated into individual vials to prevent mating and then sexed based on the difference in relative length of antenna. Males have significantly longer antennae than females, as confirmed by dissection of the genitalia (unpublished results). The adults were kept individually until used in experiments.

Chemicals

Reference compounds of different origin and purity were available for the identification work from our laboratory collection of pheromone compounds. For chemical identification and electrophysiological experiments, (Z)-5-dodecenal (Z5–12:Ald), (E)-5-dodecenal (E5–12:Ald), Z5–14:Ald, (E)-5-tetradecenal (E5–14:Ald), Z7–14:Ald and (E)-7-tetradecenal (E7–14:Ald) were prepared by oxidation of corresponding alcohols with pyridinium chlorochromate as described by Corey and Suggs (1975). The corresponding fatty acids and their methyl esters were also prepared from the respective alcohols as described in Wang et al. (2010). For field experiments, Z5–14:Ald (chemical purity 99.6%) and Z7–14:Ald (chemical purity 98.2%) were purchased from Pherobank (Wageningen, The Netherlands), and Z5–12:Ald (chemical purity 98.7%) was prepared in our laboratory from the corresponding alcohol according to Corey and Suggs (1975)

Isolation of Sex Pheromones and Pheromone Precursors

To collect volatiles, an SPME fiber coated with PDMS (7 μm film thickness, Supelco, USA) was inserted into a 5 mL gas tight syringe (Hamilton, Switzerland) to collect the headspace volatiles from 0 to 5 d old virgin female adults contained in the syringe. Volatile samples from the female moths (up to 30 individuals for A. oinophylla, and up to 8 individuals for H. rivillei) were collected repeatedly for 24 h, 48 h or 60 h. Newly emerged females were added into the syringe chamber during the headspace collection. The SPME samples were immediately subjected to GC/MS or GC-EAD analysis.

For the pheromone precursor analysis, 5–6 female abdominal tips dissected from 1- to 2-d old virgin females were combined and extracted with 10 μL chloroform/methanol (2:1 v:v) at room temperature for 24 h. The fatty acyl contents in the lipid extracts were transformed into corresponding methyl esters by base methanolysis as described in Bjostad and Roelofs (1984), and then analyzed by GC/MS.

Electrophysiology

The electrophysiological activities of the SPME samples and synthetic reference compounds were determined by analysis on an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) (Agilent, Santa Clara, California) and an electroantennographic detector (EAD). An HP-INNOWax column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., and 0.25 μm film thickness; J&W Scientific, USA) was used in the GC, where the inlet was set at 230 °C, the transfer line was heated at 255 °C and the detector was set at 280 °C. Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas, and at the end of the column a 1:1 division of the GC effluent was directed to the FID and EAD, respectively. After cutting off the tips, the antennae associated with the head of a 1–2 d old male were mounted to a PRG-2 EAG (10x gain) probe (Syntech, Kirchzarten, Germany) using conductive gel (Blågel, Cefar, Malmö, Sweden), and charcoal-filtered and humidified air passed over the antennal preparation. The GC oven was programmed from 80 °C for 1 min, at a rate of 10 °C/min to 210 °C, held for 10 min and then to 230 °C at 10 °C/min for 10 min. In the case of SPME samples, the fiber containing absorbed volatiles was injected into the GC inlet and held for 5 min. Data were collected with the software GC-EAD Pro Version 4.1 (Syntech).

Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

The SPME samples of volatiles collected from females and the fatty acyl methyl esters from gland extracts were analyzed on an Agilent 5975 mass-selective detector coupled to an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent). An HP-INNOWax column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., and 0.25 μm film thickness; J&W Scientific, USA) and a HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., and 0.25 μm film thickness; J&W Scientific, USA) were used for the analyses. Helium was used as carrier gas at a constant flow of 0.8 mL/min corresponding to linear velocity of 33 cm/s. The oven temperature program was the same as in the GC-EAD analyses.

For both SPME samples and gland fatty acyl extracts, compounds were identified based on comparison of their retention times and mass spectra with those of synthetic references on both polar and non-polar columns. Double bond positions in the putative fatty acyl pheromone precursors were localized by GC/MS analysis of the dimethyldisulphide (DMDS) adducts of corresponding methyl esters, prepared according to Dunkelblum et al. (1985). For the analysis of DMDS-adducts of fatty acyl precursors the HP-5MS column was used and the oven was programmed at 80 °C for 2 min, then to 140 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min, and finally to 260 °C at 5 °C/min, held for 20 min.

Field Experiments

The first field trials were carried out from 29 July to 17 September 2013 for A. oinophylla, and 31 July to 23 September for H. rivillei, in the same vineyards where the cocoons had been collected. The A. oinophylla trapping experiments were carried out in wine grape plantations of the cultivars Chardonnay at Pochi di Salorno, Bolzano, Italy (470 m a.s.l., 46°14’N 11°13E). The field trials on H. rivillei were carried out in a vineyard with the cultivar Pinot gris at Avio, Trento, Italy (124 m a.s.l., 45°41’N 10°55′E). The vineyards received fungicide treatments but insecticides were not applied. Synthetic blends to be tested were prepared in hexane containing 0.02% of the antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and loaded on the rubber septa (Catalogue no. 224100–020, Wheaton Science Products, Millville, NJ, USA) used as dispensers. For each species, treatments included a ternary mixture (A), three binary mixtures (B-D), three single components (E-G) and hexane alone as solvent control (H), as well as the commercial lures for the olive moth, P. oleae (I) containing Z7–14:Ald (AgriSense LLC) for comparison. The blend ratios as shown in Figs. 4 and 5 were set as found in the fatty acyl precursor composition. Except for the two control groups (H and I), the dosage of treatment A-G was set at 100 μg of the major component per bait, i.e. Z7–14 Ald for A. oinophylla and Z5–12:Ald for H. rivillei.

A second round of field trials was carried out during five weeks (W1-W5) between late May and late June 2014, to compare different dosages of the most active binary mixture for each species.

The actual blend ratios in all the treatments were confirmed by GC-FID before the field test. Five trap replicates were used for each treatment. Delta-traps with sticky inserts (Csalomon, Budapest, Hungary) were baited with the lures and suspended below the vine canopy, with the different treatments in random sequences. Traps within a replicate were randomly placed in two rows of grapevine in the orchard, with a distance of 15 m between traps and 20 m between rows. Traps were inspected once a week and redistributed within each replicate so as to minimize the potential position effect. The trapped moths were identified by their morphological characteristics.

Statistical Analyses

Differences in trap catch between treatments were compared using one-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (P < 0.01). All analyses were performed using SPSS ver.16.

Results

Analyses of Volatile Collections

The antennae of male A. oinophylla showed two repeatable responses to the SPME collections from conspecific female in GC-EAD analyses (Fig. 1). The active components eluted close to each other, the first component in trace amounts and the second in a larger amounts. The mass spectra of the two compounds showed the same characteristic fragments but with different ion ratios as did the two aldehydes previously identified from the South African leafminer H. capensis, including a molecular ion at m/z 210, a [M-18]+ fragment at m/z 192 and a [M-44]+fragment at m/z 166 (Wang et al. 2015). These compounds were subsequently confirmed as Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald (compounds 1 and 2 respectively in Fig. 1), by comparing the retention times and mass spectra with those of corresponding synthetic references on both the polar and nonpolar column.
Fig. 1

Coupled gas chromatographic-electroantennographic (GC-EAD) analysis of an SPME collection from female Antispila oinophylla. The upper trace is the chromatogram monitored with flame ionization detector (FID) and the lower trace is the antennal response from a conspecific male antenna. The SPME sample was collected for 24 h from approximately 30 4–5 d old, virgin female moths. Compound 1 was identified as (Z)-5-tetradecenal (Z5–14:Ald) and compound 2 as (Z)-7-tetradecenal (Z7–14:Ald)

However, in GC-EAD analyses of SPME collections from female H. rivillei, no responses were detected from conspecific male antennae.

Analyses of Pheromone Precursors

As another approach to identification of pheromone components, the total lipids of the abdominal tips, where the pheromone gland is most likely located, were extracted and subjected to methanolysis. The resulting fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by GC/MS to investigate putative biosynthetic precursors of the pheromone components. In addition to the ubiquitous lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid, two unusual mono-unsaturated C14 acids and one mono-unsaturated C12 acid were found in the abdominal tips of both species, but in very different ratios (Fig. 2a). The two mono-unsaturated C14 acids were confirmed as identical to the previously reported methyl (Z)-5-tetradecenoate (Z5–14:Me) and methyl (Z)-7-tetradecenoate (Z7–14:Me) found in H. capensis (Wang et al. 2015), by comparing both methyl ester and DMDS-adduct spectra with those of the synthetic compounds. In the latter case, the double bond position at Δ5 and Δ7 were indicated by a pair of diagnostic ions at m/z 161/173 and 189/145, respectively, plus a molecular ion at m/z 334. The ¨Z¨ configuration of the double bond was determined by comparing the retention times with those of the synthetic geometric isomers. In A. oinophylla, the ratio between the two C14 precursors was approximately the same as the ratio between the corresponding aldehydes found in the volatile collections.
Fig. 2

GC/MS analysis of fatty acyl pheromone precursors from pheromone glands of Antispila oinophylla and Holocacista rivillei in the form of methyl esters. a Total ion current (TIC) chromatogram of C12-C14 fatty acids in the gland of Antispila oinophylla (dashed line) and Holocacista rivillei (solid line). The insert diagram shows the composition of mono-unsaturated C12 and C14 acids, where the size of the circles indicates approximately their abundance. b Mass spectrum of the C12 mono-unsaturated methyl ester. c Mass spectrum of the DMDS-adduct of the C12 mono-unsaturated methyl ester

The methyl ester of the mono-unsaturated C12 acid was more abundant in H. rivillei compared to A. oinophylla (Fig. 2a). The mass spectrum of this compound showed a molecular ion at m/z 212, a [M-32]+fragment at m/z 180, a [M-74]+fragment at m/z 138, and a combination of the fragments at m/z 74 and 87 (Fig. 2b). The corresponding DMDS adduct showed a pair of diagnostic ions at m/z 161/145, and a molecular ion at m/z 306, indicating a double bond between carbon atoms 5 and 6 in the C12 acyl skeleton (Fig. 2c). Finally, this compound was confirmed as methyl (Z)-5-dodecenoate (Z5–12:Me), by comparing the mass spectrum and retention time with those of the synthetic geometric isomers on both columns.

These results suggest that female H. rivillei might produce a pheromone compound with corresponding chain length and position of unsaturation, but the release rate of these compounds was below the limit of detection in our collection of volatiles. Indeed, the synthetic compounds, Z5–12:Ald, Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald elicited strong responses from male H. rivillei, confirming the antennal activity of these aldehydes (Fig. 3). Interestingly, antennae from male A. oinophylla also showed a strong response to Z5–12:Ald, although the corresponding fatty acyl precursor Z5–12:Me was found in very low amounts in this species compared to Z5–14:Me and Z7–14:Me (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 3

GC-EAD responses from male Antispila oinophylla and Holocacista rivillei to synthetic pheromone compounds. Compounds in the mixture: 1 = (Z)-5-dodecenal, 2 = (Z)-5-tetradecenal, 3 = (Z)-7-tetradecenal, 4 = dodecan-1-ol, and 5 = dodecyl acrylate (the latter two compounds were found in trace amount in the SPME sample from female A. oinophylla)

Field Tests

The first round of field-trapping experiments in Italian vineyards showed that for A. oinophylla, the binary mixture of Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald in a ratio of 15:100 respectively was the most attractive treatment to conspecific males. Addition of Z5–12:Ald to this mixture did not increase the attractiveness, but removal of any of the two C14 aldehydes significantly reduced the number of males caught (Fig. 4). As no pheromone candidates had been identified in volatile collections from H. rivillei, blends tested were combinations of aldehydes corresponding to the pheromone precursors identified in gland extracts, with Z5–12:Acyl being the most abundant. The combination of Z5–12:Ald and Z7–14:Ald in a ratio of 100:6 trapped the highest number of conspecific males. Addition of Z5–14:Ald did not increase the trap catch further, whereas removal of either Z5–12:Ald or Z7–14:Ald significantly decreased the number of males attracted (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4

Trap catches of male Antispila oinophylla by different pheromone component candidates presented singly and in mixtures in a vineyard located in Pochi di Salorno, Italy (2013). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, one-way-ANOVA followed by a LSD test; 5 replicates for each treatment). Asterisk indicates that the treatment I is the commercial bait of the olive moth, Prays oleae containing a single component Z7–14:Ald at unknown concentration

Fig. 5

Trap catches of male Holocacista rivillei by different pheromone component candidates presented singly and in mixtures in a vineyard located in Avio, Italy (2013). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, one-way-ANOVA followed by a LSD test; 5 replicates for each treatment). Asterisk indicates that the treatment I is the commercial bait of the olive moth, Prays oleae containing a single component Z7–14:Ald at unknown concentration

In the second round of field experiments, different doses of the most active blend for each of the species were tested during five weeks. The highest dose of the binary mixture of Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald (45 + 300 μg/bait) was the most attractive dose to male A. oinophylla during all five weeks, although the difference between the highest and the second highest dose (15 + 100 μg/bait) was statistically significant only during the last two weeks (Fig. 6). For H. rivillei, the mixture of Z5–12:Ald and Z7–14:Ald was similarly most attractive at the highest dose (300 + 18 μg/bait), although the difference between this dose and the three times lower dose was not statistically significant during the first three weeks (Fig. 7). No significant catches of other species were observed in either of above field experiments.
Fig. 6

Trap catches of male Antispila oinophylla during five weeks (W1-W5, 16th May to 19th June, 2014) by different doses of the binary pheromone blend in the vineyard located in Pochi di Salorno, Italy. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, one-way-ANOVA followed by a LSD test; 5 replicates for each treatment)

Fig. 7

Trap catches of male Holocacista rivillei during five weeks (W1-W5, 22nd May to 23rd June, 2014) by different doses of the binary pheromone blend in the vineyard located in Avio, Italy (2014). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05, one-way-ANOVA followed by a LSD test; 5 replicates for each treatment)

Discussion

In this study we identified sex pheromone components of Antispila oinophylla van Nieukerken & Wagner and a sex attractant for another grapevine leafminer, Holocacista rivillei (Stainton). The combination of Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald, identified in SPME collections of volatiles from female A. oinophylla, proved to be highly effective in trapping conspecific males when presented in a ratio of 15:100. In the case of H. rivillei we could not find any pheromone candidates in volatiles collected from female moths. Analysis of pheromone precursors present in the glands of females indicated Z5–12:Ald and Z7–14:Ald were candidate pheromone components and a blend of these two compounds in a ratio of 100:6 respectively attracted large numbers of male H. rivillei. In both cases, deletion of either compound in the binary mixtures reduced the trap catch significantly.

Z5–12:Ald, Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald have only been identified as sex pheromone components in Lepidoptera in a few cases. So far, Z5–14:Ald was only reported as a sex pheromone component in another heliozelid moth, the South African grapevine leafminer, H. capensis (Wang et al. 2015), whereas Z7–14:Ald was reported as a pheromone component or sex attractant in the North American noctuid species Spaelotis clandestina (Harris) and Simyra henrici Grote (now a synonym of Acronicta insularis (Herrich-Schäffer)) (Steck et al. 1982a, b), in some species of Prays (Praydidae, Yponomeutoidea) (Campion et al. 1979; Nesbitt et al. 1977; Renou et al. 1979; Vang et al. 2011) and in the leafminer H. capensis (Wang et al. 2015). In addition Z7–14:Ald was recorded as an attractant for the heliozelid Antispila treitschkiella (Fischer von Röslerstamm) (Tóth et al. 1992). The Z5–12:Ald was found as sex pheromone component in Gastropacha quercifolia (Linnaeus) (Bestmann et al. 1993) and some noctuid moths in the genus Euxoa (Byers et al. 1981; Underhill et al. 1981).

Collection of A. oinophylla pheromone samples using SPME proved to be sufficient for both GC/MS and GC-EAD analyses. However, collection from H. rivillei females did not produce samples with EAD activity or any compounds appearing as obvious pheromone component candidates in GC/MS analyses. Attempts using an organic solvent (heptane) to extract the terminal abdominal tips were also unsuccessful (data not shown). Fewer individuals of H. rivillei were available to us and we tried an alternative approach, performing a comparative analysis of the pheromone gland fatty acyl precursors in the two species. Type I moth pheromones are biosynthetically derived along conserved pathways, including desaturation and limited chain shortening (For a recent review see Löfstedt et al. 2016). The fatty acid precursors of Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald are oleic acid ((Z)-9-octadecenoic acid) and palmitoleic acid ((Z)-9-hexadecenoic acid). The ratios of the corresponding 14 carbon fatty acids in the glands of A. oinophylla were similar to the ratio between the two aldehydes. The amount of Z5–14:Acyl was very low in H. rivillei but instead a large amount of Z5–12:Acyl was found together with Z7–14:Acyl. The 12-carbon homolog is derived from the Z7–14:Acyl by another round of chain-shortening and its abundance suggested that Z5–12:Ald could be a pheromone component in this species. For the field experiment on H. rivillei, the blend ratio of the binary mixture of pheromone component candidates was set according to the ratio of corresponding Z5–12 and Z7–14:Acyl precursors, and this mixture turned out to be a potent sex attractant for male H. rivillei. Sex attractants are defined as chemicals that attract males (or females) of a given species, but for which conspecific females (or males) have not yet been shown to produce the compounds (Löfstedt et al. 2016).

As with A. oinophylla, H. capensis from South Africa also uses Z5–14:Ald and Z7–14:Ald as essential sex pheromone components, but in a different blend ratio (Wang et al. 2015). The corresponding precursors, Z5–14:Acyl and Z7–14:Acyl were present in the pheromone gland of female H. capensis in the same ratio as the pheromone components, suggesting a metabolic consistency in the relation between the fatty acyl precursors and the final pheromone components in this group of moths.

Holocacista capensis is native to South Africa and A. oinophylla is a North American species recently established in Italian vineyards, whereas H. rivillei is a native European species. During their independent evolutionary history, cross-attraction among these species does not seem to be a possible event due to the geographical barriers. Their divergence in the pheromone components or in the blend ratio might have been driven by presence of other sympatric species. On the receiver side, males of H. rivillei and A. oinophylla both responded strongly to all the three identified compounds in EAG recordings (Fig. 3), although Z5–12:Ald and Z5–14:Ald are not essential attractants for A. oinophylla and H. rivillei, respectively. This may be because the pheromone receptors are not specific and respond also to analogues or alternatively receptors tuned to the non-specific compounds are actually present and play a role in interspecific interactions. Mating communication in the Heliozelidae species studied so far seems to depend exclusively on aldehydes. However, screening of EAG-activities of acetates and alcohols corresponding to the aldehyde pheromones could provide additional information on the specificity of the antennal response and the potential role of these compound classes in pheromone communication in the Heliozelidae.

Including this study, sex pheromones and attractants have now been identified in four heliozelid species. These species represent a clade that comprises most global Heliozelidae, including all Vitaceae-feeding heliozelid leafminers (Antispila group I, Holocacista group and Antispila ampelopsifoliella group) (Milla et al. 2017). Our findings suggest that the identified pheromone components were present in the ancestor of this clade since it is unlikely that the same pheromones evolved independently two or three times. We suggest that other heliozelid species use the same or similar compounds as pheromone components, possibly with specific blend ratios to achieve premating reproductive isolation.

In dose response experiments the highest dose tested was consistently the most attractive for both species over five weeks. Thus, it cannot be ruled out that a higher dose would have been even more attractive. Catches fluctuated between weeks. For A. oinophylla the highest catch was recorded during week four and for H. rivillei the highest catches occurred during the last three weeks. It is likely that fluctuating trap catches reflected differences in moth abundance over the flight period and the results also confirmed that the baits maintain their attractiveness for at least five weeks. The pheromone lures reported in this study can be used in monitoring of these vineyard pests and potentially also for pheromone-based population control by mating disruption.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the owners of the vineyards for allowing us to set up field trapping experiments. This study was partly supported by a grant from the Birgit och Håkan Olssons Stiftelse to CL and HLW.

References

  1. Andrey D, Amstutz R (2000) Determination of pesticide residues in “organic” wines on the Swiss market. Mitt Lebensm Hyg 91:300–305Google Scholar
  2. Baldessari M, Delaiti M, Zanotelli L, Bottura M, Angeli G (2010) Note morfo-biologiche su un minatore fogliare della vite del genere Antispila (Lepidoptera, Heliozelidae), nuovo per l'Italia e l'Europa. Atti Giornate Fitopatologiche 1:165–170Google Scholar
  3. Bestmann HJ, Attygalle AB, Garbe W, Kern F, Martichonok V, Schäfer D, Vostrowsky O, Hasenfuss I (1993) Chemical structure and final steps of biosynthesis of the female sex pheromone of Gastropacha quercifolia (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 23:791–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-1748(93)90067-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL (1984) Sex pheromone biosynthetic precursors in Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem 14:275–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(84)90060-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers JR, Underhill EW, Steck WF, Chisholm MD, Teal PEA (1981) Biosystematics of the genus Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). XV. Sex pheromone cross attractancy among the three closely related species of the declarata group. Can Entomol 113:235–243.  https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent113235-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabras P, Garau VL, Pirisi FM, Cubeddu M, Cabitza F, Spanedda L (1995) Fate of some insecticides from vine to wine. J Agric Food Chem 43:2613–2615.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00058a011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campion DG, McVeigh LJ, Polyrakis J, Michaelakis S, Stavrakis GN, Beevor PS, Hall DR, Nesbitt BF (1979) Laboratory and field studies of the female sex pheromone of the olive moth, Prays oleae. Experientia 35:1146–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corey EJ, Suggs JW (1975) Pyridinium chlorochromate. An efficient reagent for oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to carbonyl compounds. Tetrahedron Lett 16:2647–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunkelblum E, Tan SH, Silk PJ (1985) Double-bond location in monounsaturated fatty acids by dimethyl disulfide derivatization and mass spectrometry: application to analysis of fatty acids in pheromone glands of four Lepidoptera. J Chem Ecol 11:265–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01411414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duso C, Pozzebon A, Baldessari M, Angeli G (2011) Current status of grapevine leafminers in North-Eastern Italy. IOBC/WPRS Bull 67:203–206Google Scholar
  11. Duso C, Baldessari M, Pozzebon A, Ferrari E, Angeli G, Mazzon L, Tonina L, van Nieukerken EJ (2013) Notes on the biology and the pest status of Antispila sp. (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae) in North-Eastern Italy. IOBC/WPRS Bull 85:173–176Google Scholar
  12. Löfstedt C, Wahlberg N, Millar JM (2016) Evolutionary patterns of pheromone diversity in Lepidoptera. In Allison JD and Cardé RT (ed) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior and application, 1st edn. University of California Press, Oakland, pp 43–82Google Scholar
  13. Milla L, van Nieukerken EJ, Vijverberg R, Doorenweerd C, Wilcox SA, Halsey M, Young DA, Jones T, Kallies A, Hilton DJ (2017) A preliminary molecular phylogeny of shield-bearer moths (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea: Heliozelidae) highlights rich undescribed diversity. Mol Phylog Evol 120:129–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nesbitt BF, Beevor PS, Hall DR, Lester R, Sternlicht M, Goldenberg S (1977) Identification and synthesis of the female sex pheromone of the citrus flower moth, Prays citri. Insect Biochem 7:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pertot I, Caffi T, Rossi V, Mugnai L, Hoffmann C, Grando MS, Gary C, Lafond D, Duso C, Thiery D, Mazzoni V, Anfora G (2017) A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture. Crop Prot 97:70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renou M, Descoins C, Priesner E, Gallois M, Lettere M (1979) Z-7-Tetradecenal, the main component of the sex pheromone of the olive moth Prays oleae. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci, Ser D 288:1559–1562Google Scholar
  17. Steck WF, Underhill EW, Bailey BK, Chisholm MD (1982a) (Z)-7-tetradecenal, a seasonally dependent sex pheromone of the w-marked cutworm, Spaelotis clandestina (Harris) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 11:1119–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/11.5.1119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steck WF, Underhill EW, Chisholm MD (1982b) Structure-activity relationships in sex attractants for north American noctuid moths. J Chem Ecol 8:731–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00988315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tóth M, Szöcs G, Sziráki G, Sauter W (1992) Sex attractants for male microlepidoptera found in field trapping tests in Hungary. J Appl Entomol 113:342–355.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1992.tb00674.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Underhill EW, Steck WF, Byers JR, Chisholm MD (1981) Biosystematics of the genus Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). XVI. (Z)-5-decenyl acetate a sex attractant for three closely related species, Euxoa declarata, Euxoa campestris, and Euxoa rockburnei. Can Entomol 113:245–249.  https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent113245-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Nieukerken EJ, Geertsema H (2015) A new leafminer on grapevine and Rhoicissus (Vitaceae) in South Africa within an expanded generic concept of Holocacista (Insecta, Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae). ZooKeys 507:41–97.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.507.9536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Nieukerken EJ, Wagner DL, Baldessari M, Mazzon L, Angeli G, Girolami V, Duso C, Doorenweerd C (2012) Antispila oinophylla new species (Lepidoptera, Heliozelidae), a new north American grapevine leafminer invading Italian vineyards: taxonomy, DNA barcodes and life cycle. ZooKeys 170:29–77.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.170.2617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vang LV, Do ND, An LK, Son PK, Ando T (2011) Sex pheromone components and control of the citrus pock caterpillar, Prays endocarpa, found in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. J Chem Ecol 37:134–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9883-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang HL, Zhao CH, Millar JG, Cardé RT, Löfstedt C (2010) Biosynthesis of unusual moth pheromone components involves two different pathways in the navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella. J Chem Ecol 36:535–547.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9777-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang HL, Geertsema H, van Nieukerken EJ, Löfstedt C (2015) Identification of the female-produced sex pheromone of the leafminer Holocacista capensis infesting grapevine in South Africa. J Chem Ecol 41:724–731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0611-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Technology Transfer CentreFondazione Edmund MachSan Michele all´AdigeItaly
  3. 3.Research and Innovation CentreFondazione Edmund MachSan Michele all’AdigeItaly
  4. 4.Centre Agriculture Food EnvironmentUniversity of TrentoSan Michele all’AdigeItaly
  5. 5.Naturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations