Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 8, pp 1494–1504 | Cite as

Can Ménage-À-Trois be Used for Controlling Insects?

  • D. M. SucklingEmail author
  • E. B. Jang
  • L. A. Carvalho
  • J. T. Nagata
  • E. L. Schneider
  • A. M. El-Sayed
Article

Abstract

We propose a new cross-species disruption approach that might be capable of interrupting mating of one species that uses another insect species as the mercenary agent. We argue that insects treated with a sufficiently powerful attractant for a second species might interfere with mating of one or both species, for example, by leading males astray in pursuit of the false trails created by suitably dosing individuals of the first species. Our reciprocal test systems used (1) methyl eugenol, an attractant for male oriental fruit flies (Bactrocera dorsalis), applied to melon flies (B. cucurbitae) and (2) cuelure, a lure for male melon flies, applied to B. dorsalis. There was no mortality 1 week after either attractant was applied to individual flies at doses up to 100 ng, which was effective in attracting insects in a field cage and in the field. In wind tunnel choice tests, 100 ng of either lure topically applied to tethered flies attracted fruit fly males of the second species, which exhibited prolonged bouts of physically disruptive behaviors including chasing and bumping. In small cages, treatment of males did not reduce mating of either species, with one group of three (ménage) per cage. However, in large field cages with multiple pairs of both species present, there was a significant reduction in the mating of melon flies resulting from methyl eugenol applied to males compared to untreated controls. The treatment of oriental fruit flies with cuelure also reduced their mating to a lesser extent. These results do not yet provide the practical proof of this new concept for pest management, but other model systems may be more appropriate. This work is novel in presenting attractants on a moving target, in this case, another insect species.

Keywords

Mating disruption Attractants Methyl eugenol Cuelure Fruit flies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

D. M. Suckling undertook this project with a Fellowship under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Cooperative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Other support was provided by the US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, HortResearch, and the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology (CO6X0301). Don McInnis provided invaluable insights into mating assessment in fruit flies and comments on the manuscript. Kellie Nagai helped with preparation of material for experiments.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

(AVI 2792 kb)

References

  1. Beroza, M., Green, N., Gertler, S. I., Steiner, L. F., and Miyashita, D.H. 1961. New attractants for the Mediterranean fruit fly. Agric. Food Chem. 9:361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cunningham, R. T. 1989. Parapheromones, pp 221–230, in A. S. Robinson and G. Hooper (eds.). Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, vol. 3A. Elsevier, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. El-Sayed, A. M. 2007. The Pherobase: Database of Insect Pheromones and Semiochemicals. http://www.pherobase.com.
  4. Epsky, N. D., Heath, R. R., Uchida, G., Guzman, A., Rizzo, J., Vargas, R., and Jeronimo, F. 1996. Capture of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) using color inserts in trimedlure-baited Jackson traps. Environ. Entomol. 25:256–260.Google Scholar
  5. Jang, E. B. 1995. Effects of mating and accessory gland injections on olfactory-mediated behavior in female Mediterranean fruit fly. Ceratitis capitata. J. Insect Physiol. 41:705–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jang, E. B., and Light, D. M. 1991. Behavioral responses of female oriental fruit flies to the odor of papayas at three different ripeness stages in a laboratory flight tunnel (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Behav. 4:751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jang, E. B., Carvalho, L. A., and Stark, J. D. 1997. Attraction of female oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis, to volatile semiochemicals from leaves and extracts of a nonhost plant, Panax (Polyscias guilfoylei) in laboratory and olfactometer assays. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1389–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keiser, I., Nakagawa, S., Kobayashi, R. M., Chambers, D. L., Urago, T., and Doolitle, R. E. 1973. Attractiveness of cue-lure and the degradation product 4-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone to male melon flies in the field in Hawaii. J. Econ. Entomol. 66:112–114.Google Scholar
  9. McInnis, D. O., Rendon, P., Jang, E., Van Sauers-Muller, A., Sugayama, R., and Malavasi, A. 1999. Interspecific mating of introduced, sterile Bactrocera dorsalis with wild B. carambolae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Suriname: A potential case for cross-species sterile insect technique. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 92:758–765.Google Scholar
  10. McInnis, D. O., Tam, S., Lim, R., Komatsu, J., Kurashima, R., and Albrecht, C. 2004. Development of a pupal color-based genetic sexing strain of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 97:1026–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Minks, A. K., and Cardé, R. T. 1997. Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. Chapman and Hall, New York. 684 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Shelly, T. E., and Dewire, A. 1994. Chemically mediated mating success in male oriental fruit flies, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 87:375–382.Google Scholar
  13. Shelly, T. E., and Villalobos, E. M. 1995. Cuelure and the mating behavior of male flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Flor. Entomol. 78:473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shelly, T. E., McInnis, D. O., and Rendon, P. 2005. The sterile insect technique and the Mediterranean fruit fly: Assessing the utility of aromatherapy in large field enclosures. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Suckling, D. M., and Karg, G. 2000. Pheromones and semiochemicals, pp 63–99, in J. Rechcigl and N. Rechcigl (eds.). Biological and Biotechnical Control of Insect Pests. CRC, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Suckling
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. B. Jang
    • 2
  • L. A. Carvalho
    • 2
  • J. T. Nagata
    • 2
  • E. L. Schneider
    • 2
  • A. M. El-Sayed
    • 1
  1. 1.The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd.LincolnNew Zealand
  2. 2.USDA-ARS US Pacific Basin Agricultural Research CenterHiloUSA

Personalised recommendations