Advertisement

Impact of Inclusive Soccer Program on Psychosocial Development of Children with and without Intellectual Disabilities

  • Yonjoong Ryuh
  • Poram Choi
  • Juntack Oh
  • Chih-Chia Chen
  • Yongho LeeEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Erroneous perception of “disability” in typically developing children leads to the exclusion of children with intellectual disabilities in sport. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of inclusive soccer (INS) program on ameliorating adverse behavior in children with and without intellectual disabilities (ID). Participants were 40 children, with half having intellectual disabilities (n = 20). Both the experimental and comparison groups consisted of 10 children with and without ID, respectively. The experimental group participated in an INS whereas the comparison group participated in a segregated soccer program. The Withdrawn Behavior Checklist (WBC) and Social Distance Scale (SDS) were measured repeatedly for children with and without ID, respectively. A mixed-design ANOVA was conducted for data analysis. There were significant main effects on time, group, and interaction for both SDS and WBC of the experimental group, except between-group difference on WBC. The comparison group did not show any significant change. The social distance of children toward peers with ID and withdrawn behavior of children with ID have been reduced. The INS could provide benefits for the psychosocial development of children on both populations toward inclusion.

Keywords

Behavioral intention Social distance Withdrawn behavior Theory of planned behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Jin Ho Ryu and Hee Joung Joung for helping us with participant recruitment and data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board in our university. All parents/legal guardians signed an informed consent form, and children assented.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest has been declared.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bizer, G. Y., Hart, J., & Jekogian, A. M. (2012). Belief in a just world and social dominance orientation: Evidence for a mediational pathway predicting negative attitudes and discrimination against individuals with mental illness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 428–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogardus, E. S. (1959). Social Distance. OH: The Antioch press, Yellow Springs.Google Scholar
  5. Buljevac, M., Majdak, M., & Leutar, Z. (2012). The stigma of disability: Croatian experiences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(9), 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corrigan, P. W., Edwards, A. B., Green, A., Diwan, S. L., & Penn, D. L. (2001). Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(2), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dekker, M. C., Koot, H. M., Ende, J. V. D., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(8), 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doll, E. A. (1936). Preliminary standardization of the Vineland social maturity scale. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6(2), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, R., Kosma, M., Cardinal, B. J., Bauer, J. J., & McCubbin, J. A. (2009). A comparison of two measures of physical activity among adults with physical disabilities: The issue of scale correspondence. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21(5), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forest, M. (1987). More Education/Integration. a further collection of readings on the integration of children with mental handicaps into regular school systems. Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 4T8: Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 195 Allstate ParkwayGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassan, D., Dowling, S., McConkey, R., & Menke, S. (2012). The inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in team sports: Lessons from the youth unified sports program of Special Olympics. Sport in Society, 15(9), 1275–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heiman, T. (2000). Friendship quality among children in three educational settings. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 25(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes, C., Carter, E. W., Hughes, T., Bradford, E., & Copeland, S. R. (2002). Effects of instructional versus non-instructional roles on the social interactions of high school students. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 146–162.Google Scholar
  15. Hulteen, R. M., Smith, J. J., Morgan, P. J., Barnett, L. M., Hallal, P. C., Colyvas, K., & Lubans, D. R. (2017). Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 95, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ison, N., McIntyre, S., Rothery, S., Smithers-Sheedy, H., Goldsmith, S., Parsonage, S., & Foy, L. (2010). ‘Just like you’: A disability awareness program for children that enhanced knowledge, attitudes and acceptance: Pilot study findings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(5), 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keith, J. M., Bennetto, L., & Rogge, R. D. (2015). The relationship between contact and attitudes: Reducing prejudice toward individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ladd, G. W. (2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12: An examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77(4), 822–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, K. (2000). The effect of role playing activity through peer instruction on the mentally retarded children’s withdrawal behavior (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10211255. Accessed 25 Mar 2019
  20. Lee, Y. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, T. Y., & Choi, J. T. (2013). Home visitation program for detecting, evaluating and treating socially withdrawn youth in Korea. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 67(4), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, H., Hwang, S., Jo, S., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2014). A preliminary study for the standardization of Korean version of Vineland adaptive behavior scales revised: Focused on subject variables. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 815–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McManus, J. L., Feyes, K. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2011). Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, D., & Nettelbeck, T. (2013). Effects of short-term disability awareness training on attitudes of adolescent schoolboys toward persons with a disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38(3), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan, H., & Parker, A. (2017). Generating recognition, acceptance and social inclusion in marginalized youth populations: The potential of sports-based interventions. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(8), 1028–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nam, K., & Shin, H., (2012). Friendship expectations of students without disabilities toward peers with intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Mental Retardation, 14(2), 47–74.Google Scholar
  26. Oden, S., & Asher, S. R. (1977). Coaching children in social skills for friendship making. Child Development, 495–506.Google Scholar
  27. Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Burge, P., Brown, H. K., & Arsenault, E. (2010). Public attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disabilities as measured by the concept of social distance. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23(2), 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Özer, D., Baran, F., Aktop, A., Nalbant, S., Ağlamış, E., & Hutzler, Y. (2012). Effects of a Special Olympics unified sports soccer program on psycho-social attributes of youth with and without intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parrillo, V. N., & Donoghue, C. (2005). Updating the Bogardus social distance studies: A new national survey. The Social Science Journal, 42(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate–severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107(5), 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scior, K., & Furnham, A. (2016). Causal beliefs about intellectual disability and schizophrenia and their relationship with awareness of the condition and social distance. Psychiatry Research, 243, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silton, N. R., Flannelly, K. J., Milstein, G., & Vaaler, M. L. (2011). Stigma in America: Has anything changed?: Impact of perceptions of mental illness and dangerousness on the desire for social distance: 1996 and 2006. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siperstein, G. N., Glick, G. C., & Parker, R. C. (2009). Social inclusion of children with intellectual disabilities in a recreational setting. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, A. L. (2003). Peer relationships in physical activity contexts: A road less travelled in youth sport and exercise psychology research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanish, H. I., & Temple, V. A. (2012). Efficacy of a peer-guided exercise program for adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(4), 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson, M. C., & Scior, K. (2015). Implicit attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: Their relationship with explicit attitudes, social distance, emotions and contact. PLoS One, 10(9), e0137902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 김성애, 정대영, & 박희찬. (1997). 통합교육의 효율적인 운영방안 [Effective management plan for inclusive education]. 안산: 국립특수교육원.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonjoong Ryuh
    • 1
  • Poram Choi
    • 1
  • Juntack Oh
    • 2
  • Chih-Chia Chen
    • 1
  • Yongho Lee
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyMississippi State UniversityMS StateUSA
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyTexas Woman’s UniversityDentonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physical EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations