Advertisement

Using the Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) to Describe Young Children’s Participation and Relationship to Disability and Complexity

  • Uzma WilliamsEmail author
  • Mary Law
  • Steven Hanna
  • Jan Willem Gorter
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Minimal research exists on the participation of young children who are five years and younger. The purpose of this study is to describe the participation of young children who use a large children’s treatment centre in Ontario, Canada in relation to primary diagnosis and complexity (cumulative number of functional concerns). One hundred and seventy parent responses described environmental supports and barriers, participation frequency and level of involvement in home, daycare/preschool, and community settings as well as parent’s desired change in activities using the Young Children’s Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM). Spearman’s correlations explored the relationship between participation and complexity (using the About My Child measure), and the Mann-Whitney test explored relationships between participation and child’s primary diagnosis. Participation frequency and involvement scores were highest in the home setting followed by the daycare/preschool setting then the community setting. Participation involvement and complexity correlations showed stronger negative associations than participation frequency and complexity. Young children’s participation scores were significantly higher among children with communication disorders in comparison to children with motor/cognitive disabilities in the frequency home setting and involvement in all settings. This study supports that a stronger relationship exists between complexity and involvement in comparison to frequency, and young children with motor/cognitive disorders have lower participation scores than young children with communication disorders.

Keywords

Complexity Disability Preschool Young Children’s participation and environment measure 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Anaby, D., Hand, C., Bradley, L., DiRezze, B., Forhan, M., DiGiacomo, A., & Law, M. (2013). The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(19), 1589–1598.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748840.Google Scholar
  2. Bedell, G., Coster, W., Law, M., Liljenquist, K., Kao, Y.-C., Teplicky, R., … Khetani, M. A. (2013). Community participation, supports, and barriers of school-age children with and without disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(2), 315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.024
  3. Benjamin, T. E. (2014). Participation in early childhood educational environments for young children with and without developmental delays: A mixed methods study. Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  4. Bult, M. (2012). Participation in leisure activities of children and adolescents with physical disabilities (pp. 1–152).Google Scholar
  5. Cosbey, J., Johnston, S. S., & Dunn, M. L. (2010). Sensory processing disorders and social participation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 462–473.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09076.Google Scholar
  6. Coster, W., Law, M., & Bedell, G. (2010). Participation and environment measure – Children and youth ©.Google Scholar
  7. Coster, W., Law, M., Bedell, G., Liljenquist, K., Kao, Y. C., Khetani, M., & Teplicky, R. (2013). School participation, supports and barriers of students with and without disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 535–543.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12046.Google Scholar
  8. Khetani, M. A., Coster, W. J., Law, M. C., & Bedell, G. M. (2013). Young Children’s participation and environment measure (YC-PEM). United States: Fort Collins.Google Scholar
  9. Khetani, M. A., Graham, J. E., Davies, P. L., Law, M. C., & Simeonsson, R. J. (2014). Psychometric properties of the young Children’s participation and environment measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(2), 307–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.031.Google Scholar
  10. King, G., McDougall, J., Dewit, D., Petrenchik, T., Hurley, P., & Law, M. (2009). Predictors of change over time in the activity participation of children and youth with physical disabilities. Children’s Health Care: Journal of the Association for the Care of Children’s Health, 38(4), 321–351.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02739610903237352.Google Scholar
  11. King, G., Petrenchik, T., Dewit, D., McDougall, J., Hurley, P., & Law, M. (2010). Out-of-school time activity participation profiles of children with physical disabilities: A cluster analysis. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(5), 726–741.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01089.x.Google Scholar
  12. Koller, D., Le Pouesard, M., & Rummens, J. A. (2018). Defining social inclusion for children with disabilities: A critical literature review. Children & Society, 32, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12223.Google Scholar
  13. Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(6), 640–649 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23624528.Google Scholar
  14. Law, M., Petrenchik, T., King, G., & Hurley, P. (2007). Perceived environmental barriers to recreational, community, and school participation for children and youth with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(12), 1636–1642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.035.Google Scholar
  15. Law, M., Anaby, D., Teplicky, R., Khetani, M. A., Coster, W., & Bedell, G. (2013). Participation in the home environment among children and youth with and without disabilities. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(2), 58–66.  https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13603244419112.Google Scholar
  16. Lim, C. Y., Law, M., Khetani, M., Pollock, N., & Rosenbaum, P. (2016). Participation in out-of-home environments for young children with and without developmental disabilities. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(3), 112–125.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216659859.Google Scholar
  17. Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 30, 214–223.Google Scholar
  18. Piškur, B., Beurskens, A. J. H. M., Jongmans, M. J., Ketelaar, M., & Smeets, R. J. E. M. (2015). What do parents need to enhance participation of their school-aged child with a physical disability? A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(1), 84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12145.Google Scholar
  19. Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities. and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 28(1), 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.653604.Google Scholar
  20. Rainey, L., van Nispen, R., van der Zee, C., & van Rens, G. (2014). Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2793–2808.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0743-3.Google Scholar
  21. Ritzema, A., Lach, L., Rosenbaum, P., & Nicholas, D. (2016). About My Child: Measuring “complexity” in neurodisability. Evidence of reliability and validity. Child: Care, Health and Development, In Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
  22. Rosenbaum, P., Mesterman, R., Law, M., Jaffer, S., Russell, D., Gorter, J., … Kertoy, M. (2008). About my child. Hamilton, Ontario Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Safford, M. M., Allison, J. J., & Kiefe, C. I. (2007). Patient complexity: More than comorbidity. The vector model of complexity. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(SUPPL. 3), 382–390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0307-0.Google Scholar
  24. Soref, B., Ratzon, N. Z., Rosenberg, L., Leitner, Y., Jarus, T., & Bart, O. (2012). Personal and environmental pathways to participation in young children with and without mild motor disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(4), 561–571.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01295.x.Google Scholar
  25. Vroland-Nordstrand, K., Eliasson, A. C., Jacobsson, H., Johansson, U., & Krumlinde-Sundholm, L. (2016). Can children identify and achieve goals for intervention? A randomized trial comparing two goal-setting approaches. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58(6), 589–596.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12925.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, U., Rosenbaum, P., Gorter, J. W., McCauley, D., & Gulko, R. (2018). Psychometric properties and parental reported utility of the 19-item “about my child” (AMC-19) measure. BMC Pediatrics, 18(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1147-2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CanChildMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations