Advertisement

Presurgical Psychological Evaluation: Risk Factor Identification and Mitigation

  • Andrew R. BlockEmail author
  • Ryan J. Marek
Article

Abstract

Presurgical psychological evaluations (PPEs) are becoming an established component of the surgical process, though methods of conducting PPEs are variable. There is a lack of clarity about the goals of PPEs, the types of information that should be included, and the process for integrating information and making recommendations to the referring physicians/surgeons. This review proposes an empirically supported model for PPEs that is systematic, but flexible enough to be utilized across the broad range of surgical evaluations. This five-step method is termed the Risk Identification and Mitigation (RIM) model and is discussed in detail. The RIM model presented in this review can both serve as a structure to be utilized in under-researched PPE areas and as a stimulus for future empirical investigations.

Keywords

Surgical Health Assessment Psychopathology Mitigating 

Notes

Funding

This study has no associated funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Andrew R. Block and Ryan J. Marek receive research funding from the University of Minnesota Press.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with humans performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with humans performed by any of the authors and, thus, no informed consent was necessary.

References

  1. Albin, R. L., & Mink, J. W. (2006). Recent advances in Tourette syndrome research. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(3), 175–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton, K., Drerup, M., Windover, A., & Heinberg, L. (2009). Brief, four-session group CBT reduces binge eating behaviors among bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 5(2), 257–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.01.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton, K., Heinberg, L., Merrell, J., Lavery, M., Windover, A., & Alcorn, K. (2013). Pilot evaluation of a substance abuse prevention group intervention for at-risk bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 9(3), 462–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J., & Rini, C. (2013). Bone marrow and stem cell transplant. Presurgical psychological screening: Understanding patients, improving outcomes (pp. 103–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batsis, J. A., Clark, M. M., Grothe, K., Lopez-Jimenez, F., Collazo-Clavell, M. L., Somers, V. K., & Sarr, M. G. (2009). Self-efficacy after bariatric surgery for obesity. A population-based cohort study. Appetite, 52(3), 637–645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF (1st ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, J. T. (1993). Repeat lumbar spine surgery. Factors influencing outcome. Spine, 18(15), 2196–2200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, A. R. (2013). Spine Surgery. In A. R. Block & D. B. Sarwer (Eds.), Presurgical psychological screening: Understanding patients, improving outcomes (pp. 43–60). Washington, D.C.: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, A. R., Marek, R. J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Patient activation mediates the association between psychosocial risk factors and spine surgery results. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-018-9571-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block, A. R., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R. D., Rashbaum, R. F., & Hochschuler, S. H. (2001). The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. The Spine Journal, 1(4), 274–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Block, A. R., & Sarwer, D. B. (2013). Introduction. In A. R. Block & D. B. Sarwer (Eds.), Presurgical psychological screening: Understanding patients, improving outcomes (1st ed., pp. 3–24). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brethauer, S. A., Kim, J., El Chaar, M., Papasavas, P., Eisenberg, D., Rogers, A., … Committee, A. C. I. (2015). Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery, 25(4), 587–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1645-3.
  14. Brox, J. I., Reikerås, O., Nygaard, Ø., Sørensen, R., Indahl, A., Holm, I., … Lange, J. E. (2006). Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain, 122(1–2), 145–155.Google Scholar
  15. Brox, J. I., Sørensen, R., Friis, A., Nygaard, Ø., Indahl, A., Keller, A., … Koller, A. K. (2003). Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine, 28(17), 1913–1921.Google Scholar
  16. Cassin, S., Sockalingam, S., Hawa, R., Wnuk, S., Royal, S., Taube-Schiff, M., & Okrainec, A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a depression screening tool for bariatric surgery candidates. Psychosomatics, 54(4), 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chao, A. M., Wadden, T. A., Faulconbridge, L. F., Sarwer, D. B., Webb, V. L., Shaw, J. A., … Alamuddin, N. (2016). Binge‐eating disorder and the outcome of bariatric surgery in a prospective, observational study: Two‐year results. Obesity, 24(11), 2327–2333.Google Scholar
  18. Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T., Shekelle, P., & Owens, D. K. (2007). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(7), 478–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Coblijn, U. K., Lagarde, S. M., de Castro, S. M., Kuiken, S. D., & van Wagensveld, B. A. (2015). Symptomatic marginal ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Incidence, risk factors and management. Obesity Surgery, 25(5), 805–811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conceição, E. M., Utzinger, L. M., & Pisetsky, E. M. (2015). Eating disorders and problematic eating behaviours before and after bariatric surgery: Characterization, assessment and association with treatment outcomes. European Eating Disorders Review, 23(6), 417–425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. De Geest, S., Schäfer‐Keller, P., Denhaerynck, K., Thannberger, N., Köfer, S., Bock, A., … Steiger, J. (2006). Supporting medication adherence in renal transplantation (SMART): a pilot RCT to improve adherence to immunosuppressive regimens. Clinical Transplantation, 20(3), 359–368.Google Scholar
  22. Denhaerynck, K., Dobbels, F., Cleemput, I., Desmyttere, A., Schäfer-Keller, P., Schaub, S., & De Geest, S. (2005). Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: A literature review. Transplant International, 18(10), 1121–1133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dobbels, F., Verleden, G., Dupont, L., Vanhaecke, J., & De Geest, S. (2006). To transplant or not? The importance of psychosocial and behavioural factors before lung transplantation. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 3(1), 39–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fava, G. A., Freyberger, H. J., Bech, P., Christodoulou, G., Sensky, T., Theorell, T., & Wise, T. N. (1995). Diagnostic-criteria for use in psychosomatic research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 63(1), 1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Foley, J. A., Foltynie, T., Limousin, P., & Cipolotti, L. (2018). Standardised neuropsychological assessment for the selection of patients undergoing DBS for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4328371.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Forbey, J. D., & Lee, T. T. (2011). An exploration of the impact of invalid MMPI-2 protocols on collateral self-report measure scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(6), 556–565.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.608757.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Forbey, J. D., Lee, T. T., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., & Gartland, D. (2013). Associations between MMPI-2-RF validity scale scores and extra-test measures of personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 20(4), 448–461.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113478154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Frank, J. D. (1974). Common features of psychotherapies and their patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 24(4–6), 368–371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Geisser, M. E., Roth, R. S., & Robinson, M. E. (1997). Assessing depression among persons with chronic pain using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory: A comparative analysis. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 13(2), 163–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Grave, R. D., Calugi, S., Molinari, E., Petroni, M. L., Bondi, M., Compare, A., & Marchesini, G. (2005). Weight loss expectations in obese patients and treatment attrition: an observational multicenter study. Obesity Research, 13(11), 1961–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Hayden, M. J., Brown, W. A., Brennan, L., & O’Brien, P. E. (2012). Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory as a screening tool for a clinical mood disorder in bariatric surgery candidates. Obesity Surgery, 22(11), 1666–1675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Heinberg, L. J., Ashton, K., & Windover, A. (2010). Moving beyond dichotomous psychological evaluation: The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System for weight loss surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 6(2), 185–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stockard, J., & Tusler, M. (2005). Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research, 40(6p1), 1918–1930.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39(4p1), 1005–1026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hilgendorf, W., Butler, A., Timsina, L., Choi, J., Banerjee, A., Selzer, D., & Stefanidis, D. (2018). A behavioral rating system predicts weight loss and quality of life after bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 14(8), 1167–1172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. King, W. C., Chen, J. Y., Mitchell, J. E., Kalarchian, M. A., Steffen, K. J., Engel, S. G., … Yanovski, S. Z. (2012). Prevalence of alcohol use disorders before and after bariatric surgery. JAMA, 307(23), 2516–2525.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.6147.
  39. Lackner, J. M., & Carosella, A. M. (1999). The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine, 24(21), 2254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lageman, S. K., Mickens, M., Verkerke, T., & Holloway, K. (2013). Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. In A. R. Block & D. B. Sarwer (Eds.), Presurgical psychological screening: Understanding patients, improving outcomes (pp. 127–149). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Litt, M. D. (1988). Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Livhits, M., Mercado, C., Yermilov, I., Parikh, J. A., Dutson, E., Mehran, A., … Gibbons, M. M. (2012). Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: Systematic review. Obesity Surgery, 22(1), 70–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0472-4.
  43. Maldonado, J. R., Dubois, H. C., David, E. E., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Dyal, J., & Witten, D. (2012). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): A new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates. Psychosomatics, 53(2), 123–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Maldonado, J. R., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Swendsen, H., Skibola, D., Neri, E., … Standridge, K. (2015). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation: a prospective study of medical and psychosocial outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(9), 1018–1030.Google Scholar
  45. Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Dulmen, M., Ashton, K., & Heinberg, L. J. (2017a). Using the presurgical psychological evaluation to predict 5-year weight loss outcomes in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 13(3), 514–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Heinberg, L. J. (2016a). Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes. Obesity Reviews, 17(2), 126–141.  https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Marek, R. J., Block, A. R., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2017b). Validation of a psychological screening algorithm for predicting spine surgery outcomes. Assessment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117719512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Marek, R. J., Heinberg, L. J., Lavery, M., Merrell Rish, J., & Ashton, K. (2016b). A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 28(9), 1142–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. McCracken, L. M., & Turk, D. C. (2002). Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: Outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine, 27(22), 2564–2573.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000032130.45175.66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McIntosh, C. (2015). Psychiatric assessment of transgender adults for sex reassignment surgery. European Psychiatry, 30, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McQuellon, R., Russell, G., Cella, D., Craven, B., Brady, M., Bonomi, A., & Hurd, D. (1997). Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 19(4), 357–368.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mechanick, J. I., Youdim, A., Jones, D. B., Timothy Garvey, W., Hurley, D. L., Molly McMahon, M., … Brethauer, S. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient–2013 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 9(2), 159–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.12.010.
  53. Micanti, F., Iasevoli, F., Cucciniello, C., Costabile, R., Loiarro, G., Pecoraro, G., … Galletta, D. (2017). The relationship between emotional regulation and eating behaviour: a multidimensional analysis of obesity psychopathology. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 22(1), 105–115.Google Scholar
  54. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exeggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, J. E., Von Korff, M., Cherkin, D., Saunders, K., & Lorig, K. (2000). A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavioral program for enhancing back pain self care in a primary care setting. Pain, 88(2), 145–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality assessment inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  58. Nguyen, T. H., Randolph, D. C., Talmage, J., Succop, P., & Travis, R. (2011). Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers’ compensation subjects: A historical cohort study. Spine, 36(4), 320–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nygaard, Ø. P., Kloster, R., & Solberg, T. (2000). Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 92(2), 131–134.Google Scholar
  60. Puolakka, K., Ylinen, J., Neva, M., Kautiainen, H., & Häkkinen, A. (2008). Risk factors for back pain-related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A 5-year follow-up study. European Spine Journal, 17(3), 386–392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Remmers, C., Hibbard, J., Mosen, D. M., Wagenfield, M., Hoye, R. E., & Jones, C. (2009). Is patient activation associated with future health outcomes and healthcare utilization among patients with diabetes? The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 32(4), 320–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rivero-Arias, O., Campbell, H., Gray, A., Fairbank, J., Frost, H., & Wilson-McDonald, J. (2005). Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: Cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 330(7052), 1239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rolving, N., Nielsen, C. V., Christensen, F. B., Holm, R., Bünger, C. E., & Oestergaard, L. G. (2015). Does a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention affect disability, pain behavior, pain, and return to work the first year after lumbar spinal fusion surgery? Spine, 40(9), 593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rolving, N., Sogaard, R., Nielsen, C. V., Christensen, F. B., Bünger, C., & Oestergaard, L. G. (2016). Preoperative cognitive-behavioral patient education versus standard care for lumbar spinal fusion patients: Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Spine, 41(1), 18–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Schoenfeld, A. J., Ochoa, L. M., Bader, J. O., & Belmont, P. J., Jr. (2011). Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: A study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. JBJS, 93(17), 1577–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Skolasky, R. L., Mackenzie, E. J., Wegener, S. T., & Riley, L. H., 3rd. (2008). Patient activation and adherence to physical therapy in persons undergoing spine surgery. Spine, 33(21), E784–E791.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818027f1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Skolasky, R. L., Mackenzie, E. J., Wegener, S. T., & Riley, L. H., 3rd. (2011). Patient activation and functional recovery in persons undergoing spine surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 93(18), 1665–1671.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Slover, J., Abdu, W. A., Hanscom, B., & Weinstein, J. N. (2006). The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 31(17), 1974–1980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Sogg, S., Lauretti, J., & West-Smith, L. (2016). Recommendations for the pre-surgical psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery patients. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sogg, S., & Mori, D. L. (2009). Psychosocial evaluation for bariatric surgery: The Boston interview and opportunities for intervention. Obesity Surgery, 19(3), 369–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Soroceanu, A., Ching, A., Abdu, W., & McGuire, K. (2012). Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: A multicenter study. Spine, 37(2), E103–E108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Sperry, B. W., Ikram, A., Alvarez, P. A., Perez, A. L., Kendall, K., Gorodeski, E. Z., & Starling, R. C. (2019). Standardized psychosocial assessment before left ventricular assist device implantation: An important predictive measure. Circulation Heart Failure, 12(1), e005377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Steffen, K. J., Engel, S. G., Pollert, G. A., Li, C., & Mitchell, J. E. (2013). Blood alcohol concentrations rise rapidly and dramatically after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 9(3), 470–473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Sumanti, M., Boone, K. B., Savodnik, I., & Gorsuch, R. (2006). Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers’ compensation “stress” claim sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(4), 754–765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tarescavage, A. M., Scheman, J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in evaluations of chronic low back pain patients. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 433–446.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000056.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008/2011). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Technical manual. Minneapolis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  78. ter Gunne, A. F. P., & Cohen, D. B. (2009). Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine, 34(13), 1422–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Twillman, R. K., Manetto, C., Wellisch, D. K., & Wolcott, D. L. (1993). The transplant evaluation rating scale: A revision of the psychosocial levels system for evaluating organ transplant candidates. Psychosomatics, 34(2), 144–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Unukovych, D., Johansson, H., & Brandberg, Y. (2017). Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study. Gland surgery, 6(1), 64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. van Hout, G. C., Verschure, S. K., & van Heck, G. L. (2005). Psychosocial predictors of success following bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery, 15(4), 552–560.  https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892053723484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wadden, T. A., & Foster, G. D. (2006). Weight and lifestyle inventory (WALI). Obesity, 14(S3), 99S–118S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wee, C. C., Davis, R. B., & Hamel, M. B. (2008). Comparing the SF-12 and SF-36 health status questionnaires in patients with and without obesity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(1), 11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Yee, A., Adjei, N., Do, J., Ford, M., & Finkelstein, J. (2008). Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(5), 1154–1161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Young, G. (2014). Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, 56, 817–856.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas Back InstitutePlanoUSA
  2. 2.College of Human Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of Houston – Clear LakeHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations