Advertisement

The Moderating Role of Maternal Supervision in the Relation of Social–Ecological Risk Factors to Children’s Minor Injuries

  • Amy DamashekEmail author
  • Charles Borduin
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Although maternal supervision has been found to reduce injury risk in young children, it is not clear whether supervision moderates the impact of social–ecological risk variables on children’s injury frequency. This study examined whether maternal supervision moderated the relation of child, maternal, and family risk factors to children’s minor injuries. Mothers (N = 170) of toddlers were interviewed biweekly about their children’s injuries and their supervision over a 6-month period, and mothers completed measures about child and family variables. Supervision moderated the effect of mothers’ marital/partner relationship satisfaction on children’s injury frequency; closer supervision was protective for mothers with lower relationship satisfaction. Findings suggest that helping mothers with low levels of relationship satisfaction provide closer supervision for their children may mitigate the effects of low marital satisfaction on children’s injury frequency.

Keywords

Child injuries Maternal supervision Injury prevention Marital satisfaction 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD025414, P.I. Lizette Peterson).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors, Amy Damashek and Charles Borduin, declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Western Michigan University Human Subjects Institutional Review Board, protocol # 12-11-02) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abidin, R. (1995). Parenting stress index (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the child behavior checklist/2-3 & 1992 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Allegrante, J. P., Marks, R., & Hanson, D. W. (2006). Ecological models for the prevention and control of unintentional injury. In A. C. Gielen, D. A. Sleet, & R. J. DiClemente (Eds.), Injury and violence prevention: Behavioral science theories, methods, and applications (pp. 105–126). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Borse, N. N., Gilchrist, J., Dellinger, A. M., Rudd, R. A., Ballesteros, M. F., & Sleet, D. A. (2008). CDC childhood injury report: Patterns of unintentional injuries among 0–19 year olds in the United States, 2000-2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
  6. Bradbury, K., Janicke, D. M., Riley, A. W., & Finney, J. W. (1999). Predictors of unintentional injuries to school-age children seen in pediatric primary care. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 24, 423–433.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/24.5.423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britner, P. A., Morog, M. C., Pianta, R. C., & Marvin, R. S. (2003). Stress and coping: A comparison of self-report measures of functioning in families of young children with cerebral palsy or no medical diagnosis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 335–348.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000313403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campis, L. K., Lyman, R. D., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1986). The parental locus of control scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, WISQARS: Cost of Injury Reports. Electronic reference by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved May 2018, from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html.
  11. Christoffel, K. K., Donovan, M., Schofer, J., Wills, K., & Lavigne, J. (1996). Psychosocial factors in childhood pedestrian injury: A matched case-control study. Pediatrics, 97, 33–42.Google Scholar
  12. Damashek, A., & Corlis, M. (2017). The role of proximal maternal supervision in children’s risk for injury in a low-income sample. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 42, 727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damashek, A., Williams, N., Sher, K., & Peterson, L. (2009). Relation of maternal alcohol use to unintentional childhood injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 344–353.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumas, J. E., Gibson, J. A., & Albin, J. B. (1989). Behavioral correlates of maternal depressive symptomatology in conduct-disorder children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 516–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glik, D., Kronenfeld, J., & Jackson, K. (1993). Safety behaviors among parents of preschoolers. Health Values: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education & Promotion, 17, 18–27.Google Scholar
  16. Hapgood, R., Kendrick, D., & Marsh, P. (2000). How well do socio-demographic characteristics explain variation in childhood safety practices? Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, M. J., & Kotch, J. B. (1994). Unintentional infant injuries: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Public Health Nursing, 11, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). The four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  19. Karazsia, B. T., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2011). The predictive validity of injury proxies: Predicting early adolescent injuries with assessments of minor injuries. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33, 386–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9227-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrongiello, B. A., Corbett, M., & Brison, R. J. (2009). Identifying predictors of medically- attended injuries to young children: Do child or parent behavioural attributes matter? Injury Prevention, 15, 220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2008.019976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrongiello, B. A., Corbett, M., McCourt, M., & Johnston, N. (2006). Understanding unintentional injury risk in young children II. The contribution of caregiver supervision, child attributes, and parent attributes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 540–551.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsj073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morrongiello, B. A., & Dawber, T. (1998). Toddlers’ and mothers’ behaviors in an injury-risk situation: Implications for sex differences in childhood injuries. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrongiello, B. A., & House, K. (2004). Measuring parent attributes and supervision behaviors relevant to child injury risk: Examining the usefulness of questionnaire measures. Injury Prevention, 10, 114–118.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2003.003459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrongiello, B. A., Klemencic, N., & Corbett, M. (2008). Interactions between child behavior patterns and parent supervision: Implications for children’s risk of unintentional injury. Child Development, 79, 627–638.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01147.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrongiello, B. A., Ondejko, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2004). Understanding toddlers’ in-home injuries: I. Context, correlates, and determinants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 415–431.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsh046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orton, E., Kendrick, D., West, J., & Tata, L. J. (2012). Independent risk factors for injury in pre-school children: Three population-based nested case-control studies using routine primary care data. PLoS ONE, 7, e35193–e35201.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peterson, L., Brown, D., Bartlestone, J., & Kern, T. (1996a). Methodological considerations in participant event monitoring of low base-rate events in health psychology: Children’s injuries as a model. Health Psychology, 15, 124–130.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.15.2.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peterson, L., DiLillo, D., Lewis, T., & Sher, K. (2002). Improvement in quantity and quality of measurement of toddler injuries and parental interventions. Behavior Therapy, 33, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peterson, L., Saldana, L., & Heiblum, N. (1996b). Quantifying tissue damage from childhood injury: The minor injury severity scale (MISS). Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 251–267.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/21.2.251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phelan, K., Khoury, J., Atherton, H., & Kahn, R. S. (2007). Maternal depression, child behavior, and injury. Injury Prevention, 13, 403–408.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2006.014571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phelan, K. J., Morrongiello, B. A., Khoury, J. C., Xu, Y., Liddy, S., & Lanphear, B. (2014). Maternal supervision of children during their first 3 years of life: The influence of maternal depression and child gender. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radloff, L. S. (1991). The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Schwebel, D. C., & Brezausek, C. M. (2007). The role of context in risk for pediatric injury. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (1982). A confirmatory analysis of the dyadic adjustment scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stroud, C. B., Durbin, C. E., Wilson, S., & Mendelsohn, K. A. (2011). Spillover to triadic and dyadic systems in families with young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 919–930.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thuen, F. (1992). Preventing childhood accidents in the home: Parental behavior to reduce household hazards. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 33, 370–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zolotor, A. J., Burchinal, M., Skinner, D., & Rosenthal, M. (2008). Maternal psychological adjustment and knowledge of infant development as predictors of home safety practices in rural low-income communities. Pediatrics, 121, e1668–e1675.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations