Advertisement

Lung water assessment: from gravimetry to wearables

  • Frederic MichardEmail author
Commentary
  • 207 Downloads

Abstract

Several techniques are now available to detect and quantify pulmonary edema, from the laboratory postmortem method (gravimetry) to non-invasive wearable sensors. In critically ill patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), computed tomography scans are often performed to visualize lung lesions and quantify lung aeration, but their value seems somewhat limited to quantify pulmonary edema on a routine basis and of course to track changes with therapy. In this context, transpulmonary thermodilution is a convenient technique. It is invasive but most patients with ARDS have a central line and an arterial catheter in place. In addition to extravascular lung water measurements, transpulmonary thermodilution enables the measurement of hemodynamic variables that are useful to guide fluid and diuretic therapy. Echo probes are about to replace the stethoscope in our pocket and, if B lines (aka comet tails) do not allow a real quantification of pulmonary edema, they are useful to detect an increase in lung water. Finally, wireless and wearable sensors are now available to monitor patients on hospital wards and beyond (home monitoring). They should enable the detection of pulmonary congestion at a very early stage, and if combined with a proactive therapeutic strategy, have potential to improve outcome.

Keywords

Pulmonary edema Lung water Transpulmonary thermodilution Point of care ultrasound Wearable 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

FM is the founder and managing director of MiCo, a Swiss consulting firm. MiCo does not sale any medical product. FM does not own shares and does not receive royalties from any medtech company.

References

  1. 1.
    Michard F. Bedside assessment of extravascular lung water by dilution methods: temptations and pitfalls. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1186–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patroniti N, Bellani G, Maggioni E, et al. Measurement of pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2547–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis FR, Elings VB, Hill SL, Christensen JM. The measurement of extravascular lung water by thermal-green dye indicator dilution. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;384:394–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mihm FG, Feeley TW, Jamieson SW. Thermal dye double indicator dilution measurement of lung water in man: comparison with gravimetric measurements. Thorax. 1987;42:72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:180–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saugel B, Wildgruber M, Staudt A, et al. Quantitative computed tomography in comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution for the estimation of pulmonary fluid status: a clinical study in critically ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0144-1 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michard F, Schachtrupp A, Toens C. Factors influencing the estimation of extravascular lung water by transpulmonary thermodilution in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang F, Li C, Zhang J, Guo H, Wu D. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography analysis and single-indicator thermodilution to measure pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. BioMed Eng Online. 2014;13:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lichtenstein D. BLUE-protocol and FALLS-protocol: two applications of lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Chest. 2015;147;1659–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agricola E, Bove T, Oppizzi M, et al. Ultrasound comet-tail images: a marker of pulmonary edema. A comparative study with wedge pressure and extravascular lung water. Chest. 2005;127:1690–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Picano E, Frassi F, Agricola E, et al. Ultrasound lung comets: a clinically useful sign of extravascular lung water. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michard F. A sneak peek into digital innovations and wearable sensors for cardiac monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293:H583-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia X, Simon P, Guyette FX, et al. Noninvasive assessment of acute dyspnea in the ED. Chest. 2013;144:610–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kossari N, Hufnagel G, Squara P. Bioreactance: a new tool for cardiac output and thoracic fluid content monitoring during hemodialysis. Hemodial Int. 2009;13:512–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Bourge RC, et al. Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomized trial. Lancet 2016;387:453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amir O, Azzam ZS, Gaspar T, et al. Validation of remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) technology for quantification of lung fluid status: comparison to high resolution chest computed tomography in patients with and without acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:841–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amir O, Ben-Gal T, Weinstein JM, et al. Evaluation of remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) technology-guided therapy for decreasing heart failure re-hospitalizations. Int J Cardiol. 2017;240:279–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Crit Care. 2017;21:147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MiCoDenensSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations