Evaluation of the novel non-invasive zero-heat-flux Tcore™ thermometer in cardiac surgical patients
- 118 Downloads
Tcore™ Sensor is a novel zero-heat-flux thermometer that estimates core temperature from skin over forehead. We tested the hypothesis that this system estimates core temperature to an accuracy within 0.5 °C. 40 cardiac surgical patients were enrolled (960 measurements). Reference core temperatures were measured in nasopharynx, pulmonary artery and the arterial branch of the oxygenator of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. 95% Bland–Altman limits of agreement for repeated measurement data was used to study the agreement between Tcore™ thermometer and the reference methods. The proportion of all differences that were within 0.5 °C and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) were estimated as well. The mean overall difference between Tcore™ and nasopharyngeal temperature was − 0.2 ± 0.5 °C (95% limits of agreement of ± 1.09). The proportion of differences within 0.5 °C was 68.80% (95% CI 65.70–71.70%) for nasopharyngeal reference. LCCC was 0.84 (95% CI 0.83–0.86). The mean bias between Tcore™ and the temperature measured in the pulmonary artery was − 0.2 ± 0.5 °C (95% limits of agreement of ± 1.16). 55.30% of measurements were ≤ 0.5 °C (95% CI 51.40–59.20%). LCCC was 0.60 (95% CI 0.56–0.64). The average difference between Tcore™ and the temperature measured at the arterial outlet during the CPB period was − 0.1 ± 0.7 °C (95% limits of agreement of ± 1.43). The proportion of differences within 0.5 °C was 54.40% (95% CI 48.80–60.00%). LCCC was 0.74 (0.69–0.79). Cutaneous forehead zero-flux temperatures were not sufficiently accurate for routine clinical use in the cardiac surgical population.
KeywordsAnesthesia Body temperature Cardiac surgical procedures Thermometers
JAS: Study design, patient recruitment, data collection, data analysis, drawing up the first draft of the paper and correspondence ; MJP: Study design, drawing up the first draft of the paper; TL: Study design, drawing up the first draft of the paper. All coauthors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Drägerwerk AG & Co (Germany) provided the Tcore™ thermometer used for the study. None of the authors has a personal financial interest in this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. José A. Sastre has received an honorarium from Smiths Medical for teaching on perioperative temperature management and from 3M for the prize “Temperature monitoring and prevention of hypothermia”, of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology. Maria J. Pascual and Teresa López have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Mahoney CB, Odom J. Maintaining intraoperative normothermia: a meta-analysis of outcomes with costs. AANA J. 1999;67:155–63.Google Scholar
- 4.Grigore AM, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, et al. The rewarming rate and increased peak temperature alter neurocognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:4–10.Google Scholar
- 9.Nussmeier NA. Management of temperature during and after cardiac surgery. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32:472–6.Google Scholar
- 13.Fox RH, Solman AJ. A new technique for monitoring the deep body temperature in man from the intact skin surface. J Physiol. 1971;212:8P–10P.Google Scholar
- 16.McBride GB. A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient. NIWA Client Report: HAM2005-062; 2005.Google Scholar