Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 803–823 | Cite as

Espoused Religious Values in Organizations and Their Associations with Applicant Intentions to Pursue a Job

  • Mitchell J. NeubertEmail author
  • Matthew S. Wood
Original Paper
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between an organization’s religious values, as espoused by the founder or in media messaging, and applicant intentions to pursue a job. Drawing on person-organization fit theory, we also explored interactions between an organization’s espoused religious values and characteristics of the individual applicant. We tested our predictions via two conjoint analysis experiments, one with 191 employed adults collectively making 2292 employment pursuit decisions and a second with 120 employed adults making 1080 employment pursuit decisions. Espousing religious values as a founder or in media messaging yielded lower intentions to pursue a job than when an organization espouses non-religious values. However, when there was fit based on religious values, these relationships were mitigated. The results expand our understanding of person-organization fit by demonstrating the potential influence of espousing religious values on attracting organizational members.

Keywords

Religious values Person-organization fit Applicant intentions Conjoint analysis 

References

  1. Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 219–237.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altman, D. G., & Royston, P. (2006). The cost of dichotomizing continuous variables. British Medical Journal, 332, 1080.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balog, A. M., Baker, L. T., & Walker, A. G. (2014). Religiosity and spirituality in entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 11(2), 159–186.Google Scholar
  5. Bhasin, K., & Hicken, M. (2012). 17 companies that are intensely religious. http://www.businessinsider.com/17-big-companies-that-are-intensely-religious-2012-1
  6. Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: Examining the role of person–organisation and person–job fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 138–162.Google Scholar
  7. Brandstätter, H. (1997). Becoming an entrepreneur—a question of personality structure? Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(2), 157–177.Google Scholar
  8. Cable, D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search risk taking high performance decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317–348.Google Scholar
  9. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.Google Scholar
  10. Cady, S. H., Wheeler, J. V., DeWolf, J., & Brodke, M. (2011). Mission, vision, and values: What do they say? Organization Development Journal, 29(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
  11. Carless, S. A. (2005). Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 411–429.Google Scholar
  12. Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S. M., & Michaels, E. G. (1998). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 44–57.Google Scholar
  13. Chan-Serafin, S., Brief, A. P., & George, J. M. (2013). How does religion matter and why? Religion and the organizational sciences. Organization Science, 24(5), 1585–1600.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928–944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349.Google Scholar
  16. Chiu, R. K., Wai-Mei Luk, V., & Li-Ping Tang, T. (2002). Retaining and motivating employees: Compensation preferences in Hong Kong and China. Personnel Review, 31(4), 402–431.Google Scholar
  17. Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of Web-based recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 723–734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, D. C., & Arnold, H. J. (1978). Position choice: Comparing the importance of organizational and job factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 706–710.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, C. D., Ilgen, D. R., & Hoyer, W. D. (1979). Source credibility, information favorability, and job offer acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 94–103.Google Scholar
  21. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  22. Fort, T. L. (1998). Religion in the workplace: Mediating religion’s good, bad and ugly naturally. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics & Public Policy, 12(1), 121.Google Scholar
  23. George, M., Freeling, A., & Court, D. (1994). Reinventing the marketing organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 43–62.Google Scholar
  24. Ghumman, S., Ryan, A. M., Barclay, L. A., & Markel, K. S. (2013). Religious discrimination in the workplace: A review and examination of current and future trends. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(4), 439–454.Google Scholar
  25. Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.Google Scholar
  26. Green, P., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3–19.Google Scholar
  27. Griebel, J. M., Park, J. Z., & Neubert, M. J. (2014). Faith and work: An exploratory study of religious entrepreneurs. Religions, 5(3), 780–800.Google Scholar
  28. Gully, S. M., Phillips, J. M., Castellano, W. G., Han, K., & Kim, A. (2013). A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 935–973.Google Scholar
  29. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
  31. Haynie, J., Shepherd, D., & McMullen, J. (2009). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 337–361.Google Scholar
  32. Heck, R., Thomas, S., & Tabata, L. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Herek, G. M. (1987). Religious orientation and prejudice a comparison of racial and sexual attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(1), 34–44.Google Scholar
  34. Hicks, D. A. (2002). Spiritual and religious diversity in the workplace: Implications for leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 379–396.Google Scholar
  35. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986–1001.Google Scholar
  36. Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389–399.Google Scholar
  37. Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (2005). The long-term performance of small businesses: Are there differences between “Christian-based” companies and their secular counterparts? Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 187–193.Google Scholar
  38. Jones Jr., H. B. (1997). The protestant ethic: Weber’s model and the empirical literature. Human Relations, 50(7), 757–778.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, D., Willness, C., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404.Google Scholar
  40. Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 359–394.Google Scholar
  41. Kelly, D. F. (Ed.). (1986). The Westminster shorter catechism in modern English. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  42. Klaas, B. S., & Wheeler, H. N. (1990). Managerial decision making about employee discipline: A policy-capturing approach. Personnel Psychology, 43(1), 117–134.Google Scholar
  43. Kolvereid, L. (1996). Organizational employment versus self-employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 20(3), 23–32.Google Scholar
  44. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.Google Scholar
  45. Kristof-Brown, A., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person–environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  46. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.Google Scholar
  47. Lam, H., & Khare, A. (2010). HR’s crucial role for successful CSR. Journal of International Business Ethics, 3(2), 3–15.Google Scholar
  48. Louviere, J. J. (1988). Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22(1), 93–119.Google Scholar
  49. Lynn, M. L., Naughton, M. J., & VanderVeen, S. (2009). Faith at work scale (FWS): Justification, development, and validation of a measure of Judaeo-Christian religion in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 227–243.Google Scholar
  50. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. McKelvie, A., Haynie, J. M., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 273–292.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, D. W. (2003). The faith at work movement. Theology Today, 60, 301–310.Google Scholar
  53. Miller, D. W. (2007). God at work: The history and promise of the faith at work movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Miller, K. D. (2014). Organizational research as practical theology. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 276–299.Google Scholar
  55. Mitchell, J. R., & Shepherd, D. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 138–154.Google Scholar
  56. Murnieks, C., Haynie, J. M., Wiltbank, R., & Harting, T. (2011). ‘I like how you think’: Similarity as an interaction bias in the investor–entrepreneur dyad. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1533–1561.Google Scholar
  57. Neubert, M. J., & Halbesleben, K. (2015). Called to commitment: An examination of relationships between spiritual calling, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 859–872.Google Scholar
  58. Nisen, M. (2013). 18 extremely religious big American companies. http://www.businessinsider.com/18-extremely-religious-big-american-companies-2013-6?op=1
  59. Ogunfowora, B. (2014). The impact of ethical leadership within the recruitment context: The roles of organizational reputation, applicant personality, and value congruence. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 528–543.Google Scholar
  60. Parboteeah, K. P., Paik, Y., & Cullen, J. B. (2009). Religious groups and work values: A focus on Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
  61. Pargament, K. I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  62. Perry, R. B. (1915). Religious values. The American Journal of Theology, 19(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  63. Pew Research Center (2015a). The future of world religions: Population growth projections, 2010–2050. Accessed August 1, 2017 http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
  64. Pew Research Center (2015b). America’s changing religious landscape. Accessed on august 1, 2017 http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
  65. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340.Google Scholar
  66. Priem, R. (1994). Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organization Science, 5, 422–437.Google Scholar
  67. Putnam, R. D., Campbell, D. E., & Garrett, S. R. (2012). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York City: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  68. Roccas, S. (2005). Religion and value systems. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 747–759.Google Scholar
  69. Rokeach, M. (1969). Part II. Religious values and social compassion. Review of Religious Research, 11(1), 24–39.Google Scholar
  70. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values (Vol. 438). New York: Free press.Google Scholar
  71. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Saks, A. M., Wiesner, W. H., & Summers, R. J. (1996). Effects of job previews and compensation policy on applicant attraction and job choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(1), 68–85.Google Scholar
  73. Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.Google Scholar
  74. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 721–734.Google Scholar
  75. Schein, E. H. (1993). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd eel. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  76. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–454.Google Scholar
  77. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773.Google Scholar
  78. Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of employment-at-will policies and compensation policies on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 653–656.Google Scholar
  79. Scott, E. D. (2002). Organizational moral values. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 33–55.Google Scholar
  80. Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1997). Conjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 203–248). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  81. Sullivan, S. C. (2006). The work-faith connection for low-income mothers: A research note. Sociology of Religion, 67, 99–108.Google Scholar
  82. Tang, T. L. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 197–202.Google Scholar
  83. Tang, T. L. P. (2010). Money, the meaning of money, management, spirituality, and religion. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 7(2), 173–189.Google Scholar
  84. Tang, T. L. P., Kim, J. K., & Tang, D. S. H. (2000). Does attitude toward money moderate the relationship between intrinsic job satisfaction and voluntary turnover? Human Relations, 53(2), 213–245.Google Scholar
  85. Tongeren, D. R., Raad, J. M., McIntosh, D. N., & Pae, J. (2013). The existential function of intrinsic religiousness: Moderation of effects of priming religion on intercultural tolerance and afterlife anxiety. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 508–523.Google Scholar
  86. Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2000). Person–organization fit: The match between newcomers’ and recruiters’ preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 113–149.Google Scholar
  87. Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489.Google Scholar
  88. Walker, A. G. (2013). The relationship between the integration of faith and work with life and job outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 453–461.Google Scholar
  89. Walker, A. G., Smither, J. W., & DeBode, J. (2012). The effects of religiosity on ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 437–452.Google Scholar
  90. Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242.Google Scholar
  91. Weaver, G. R., & Agle, B. R. (2002). Religiosity and ethical behavior in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 77–97.Google Scholar
  92. Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism (Trans. T. Parsons). New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  93. Wernimont, P., & Fitzpatrick, S. (1972). The meaning of money. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(3), 218–226.Google Scholar
  94. Williams, M. L., & Dreher, G. F. (1992). Compensation system attributes and applicant pool characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 571–595.Google Scholar
  95. Wood, M. S., & Williams, D. W. (2014). Opportunity evaluation as rule-based decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 573–602.Google Scholar
  96. Zacharakis, A., McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. (2007). Venture capitalists’ decision making across three countries: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 691–708.Google Scholar
  97. Zhang, L., & Gowan, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility, Applicants' individual traits, and organizational attraction: A person-organization fit perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 345–362.Google Scholar
  98. Zhou, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (2001). Chinese and American managers’compensation award decisions: A comparative policy-capturing study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 115–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementBaylor UniversityWacoUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntrepreneurshipBaylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations