Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 471–483 | Cite as

Professional Commitment and Team Effectiveness: A Moderated Mediation Investigation of Cognitive Diversity and Task Conflict

  • Rebecca MitchellEmail author
  • Brendan Boyle
  • Shauna Von Stieglitz
Original Paper

Abstract

This study investigates a moderated mediation model of professional commitment and team effectiveness through cognitive diversity moderated by task conflict. Data were collected from 70 UK healthcare teams and their leaders using two questionnaires. We find that teams comprised of members who have, on average, high professional commitment are more effective than teams of members who are less committed and that this path is mediated by cognitive diversity and contingent on task conflict. Team composed of members who are strongly committed to their profession may be more effective consequent to their advocacy of different perspectives and expertise, reflecting cognitive diversity. However, this positive effect of professional commitment is not universal but contingent on the level of disagreement between members on task-related issues. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that professional commitment can increase team effectiveness and does so through a complex contingent path. While few studies have investigated professional commitment, our results suggest that such commitment can be of great value to multidisciplinary teams.

Keywords

Professional commitment Multidisciplinary teams Cognitive diversity Conflict 

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1141–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100607.Google Scholar
  2. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(special issue: Strategic leaders and leadership), 107–124.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, T. E., Kernan, M. C., Clark, K. D., & Klein, H. J. (2015). Dual commitments to organizations and professions: Different motivational pathways to productivity. Journal of Management.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315602532.
  5. Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, G. (2001). On assessing the construct validity of two multidimensional constructs: Occupational commitment and occupational entrenchment. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 279–298.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, G., & Lunz, M. (1998). Testing the incremental effect of professional commitment on intent to leave one’s profession beyond the effects of external, personal, and work-related variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(2), 260–269.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Breitsohl, H., & Ruhle, S. (2013). Residual affective commitment to organizations: Concept, causes and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 23(2), 161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.07.008.Google Scholar
  11. Chang, J. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2007). The dynamic relation between organizational and professional commitment of highly educated research and development (R&D) professionals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(3), 299–315.Google Scholar
  12. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. CHSRF. (2008). Interprofessional collaboration and quality primary healthcare. Retrieved from Ontario.Google Scholar
  14. Currie, G., Finn, R., & Martin, G. (2007). Spanning boundaries in pursuit of effective knowledge sharing within networks in the NHS. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 21(4/5), 406–417.Google Scholar
  15. Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87–103.Google Scholar
  16. Curşeu, P. L., Schruijer, S., & Boroş, S. (2007). The effects of groups’ variety and disparity on groups’ cognitive complexity. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 187–206.Google Scholar
  17. D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M. D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 116–131.Google Scholar
  18. Dawson, J. (2003). Do we have enough? The accuracy of incomplete data from small groups. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting Best Paper Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY.Google Scholar
  19. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 285–298.Google Scholar
  20. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task and relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.Google Scholar
  21. de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844.Google Scholar
  22. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53.Google Scholar
  23. DeDreu, C., & West, M. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.Google Scholar
  24. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452.Google Scholar
  26. Farris, G. F., & Cordero, R. (2002). Leading your scientists and engineers 2002. Research-Technology Management, 45(6), 13–25.Google Scholar
  27. Fay, D., Borrill, C., Amir, Z., Haward, R., & West, M. (2006). Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in heatlh care. Journal of Occupation and Organizational Psychology, 79(4), 553–567.Google Scholar
  28. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.Google Scholar
  29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  30. Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Rigdon, E. E. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for admnistrative and social science research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(2), iii–xiv.Google Scholar
  32. Gibson, C. B. (2001). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
  33. Gilbert, J. H., Yan, J., & Hoffman, S. J. (2010). A WHO report: Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Journal of Allied Health, 39(Supplement 1), 196–197.Google Scholar
  34. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.Google Scholar
  35. Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979–1004.Google Scholar
  36. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011a). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2011b). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.Google Scholar
  38. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In.Google Scholar
  39. Hayes, A. F. (2015). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS. In.Google Scholar
  40. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.Google Scholar
  41. Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474–487.Google Scholar
  42. Hoff, T. J. (2000). Professional commitment among US physician executives in managed care. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1433–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00410-4.Google Scholar
  43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterixed model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.Google Scholar
  44. Hudson, B. (2002). Interprofessionality in health and social care: The Achilles’ heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
  45. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145.Google Scholar
  46. Institute of Medicine. (2003). Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Retrieved from Washington DC:Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53–75).Google Scholar
  48. Jeffcott, S. A., & Mackenzie, C. F. (2008). Measuring team performance in healthcare: Review of research and implications for patient safety. Journal of Critical Care, 23(2), 188–196.Google Scholar
  49. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.Google Scholar
  50. Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. In Academy of Management Journal (Vol. 44, pp. 238). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  51. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.Google Scholar
  52. Kiesler, C. A., & Corbin, L. H. (1965). Commitment, attraction, and conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(6), 890–895.Google Scholar
  53. Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., & Mehra, A. (2000). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 11(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  54. Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 130–151.  https://doi.org/10.5465/arma.2010.0018.Google Scholar
  55. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236.Google Scholar
  56. Lachman, R., & Aranya, N. (1986). Job attitudes and turnover intentions among professionals in different work settings. Organization Studies, 7(3), 279–293.Google Scholar
  57. LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.Google Scholar
  58. Lee, K., Carswell, J. J., & Allen, N. J. (2000). A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment: Relations with person-and work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 799–811.Google Scholar
  59. Lemieux-Charles, L., & McGuire, W. L. (2006). What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review, 63(3), 263–300.Google Scholar
  60. Lingard, L., Reznick, R., DeVito, I., & Espin, S. (2002). Forming professional identities on the health care team: Discursive constructions of the ‘other’ in the operating room. Medical Education, 36(8), 728–734.Google Scholar
  61. Liu, Y., Keller, R. T., & Shih, H. A. (2011). The impact of team-member exchange, differentiation, team commitment, and knowledge sharing on R&D project team performance. R&D Management, 41(3), 274–287.Google Scholar
  62. Lu, K.-Y., Chang, L.-C., & Wu, H.-L. (2007). Relationships between professional commitment, job satisfaction, and work stress in public health nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(2), 110–116.Google Scholar
  63. Lu, K.-Y., Lin, P.-L., Wu, C.-M., Hsieh, Y.-L., & Chang, Y.-Y. (2002). The relationships among turnover intentions, professional commitment, and job satisfaction of hospital nurses. Journal of Professional Nursing, 18(4), 214–219.Google Scholar
  64. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476.Google Scholar
  65. May, T. Y.-M., Korczynski, M., & Frenkel, S. (2002). Organizational and occupational commitment: Knowledge workers in large corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 775–801.Google Scholar
  66. McNeil, K., Mitchell, R., & Parker, V. (2013). Interprofessional practice and professional identity threat. Health Sociology Review, 22, 291307.Google Scholar
  67. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1987). Organizational commitment: Toward a three-component model (660). Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar
  68. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.Google Scholar
  69. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551.Google Scholar
  70. Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991–1007.Google Scholar
  71. Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326.Google Scholar
  72. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.Google Scholar
  73. Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., O’Brien, R., Malik, A., Tian, K., Parker, V., & Chiang, V. (2017). Balancing cognitive diversity and mutual understanding in multidisciplinary teams. Health Care Management Review, 42(1), 42–52.Google Scholar
  74. Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Chiang, V., & Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 217–239.Google Scholar
  75. Mitchell, R., Parker, V., Giles, M., & White, N. (2010). Review: Toward realizing the potential of diversity in composition of interprofessional health care teams an examination of the cognitive and psychosocial dynamics of interprofessional collaboration. Medical Care Research and Review, 67(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  76. Mitchell, R. J., Parker, V., & Giles, M. (2011). When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness. Human Relations, 64(10), 1321–1343.Google Scholar
  77. Moore, W. E. (1970). The professions: Roles and rules. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Morrow, P. C., & Wirth, R. E. (1989). Work commitment among salaried professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 34(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
  79. Neininger, A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Kauffeld, S., & Henschel, A. (2010). Effects of team and organizational commitment––a longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 567–579.Google Scholar
  80. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.Google Scholar
  81. Nemeth, C. J. (1985). Dissent, group process, and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. Advances in Group Processes, 2(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
  82. Nemeth, C. J. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition, 13(3), 273–291.Google Scholar
  83. Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196–222.Google Scholar
  84. Park, W. W. (2011). A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3(4), 229–245.Google Scholar
  85. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.Google Scholar
  86. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  87. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.Google Scholar
  88. Ramanujam, R., & Rousseau, D. M. (2006). The challenges are organizational not just clinical. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 811–827.Google Scholar
  89. Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and the organization: The organization man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 460–471.Google Scholar
  90. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.Google Scholar
  91. Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS version 2.0 M2. In: Hamburg, Germany: Institute for Operations Management and Organization at the University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  92. Roberson, Q. M. (2013). Diversity theory and research. The Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work, 461.Google Scholar
  93. Rueschemeyer, D. (1983). Professional autonomy and the social control of expertise. In R. Dingwell & P. Lewis (Eds.), The sociology of the professions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  94. Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212.Google Scholar
  95. Shortell, S. M., Marsteller, J. A., Lin, M., Pearson, M. L., Wu, S.-Y., Mendel, P., & Rosen, M. (2004). The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care. Medical Care, 42(11), 1040–1048.Google Scholar
  96. Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 555–577.Google Scholar
  97. Teng, C.-I., Shyu, Y.-I. L., & Chang, H.-Y. (2007). Moderating effects of professional commitment on hospital nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(1), 47–54.Google Scholar
  98. Teng, C. I., Dai, Y. T., Lotus Shyu, Y. I., Wong, M. K., Chu, T. L., & Tsai, Y. H. (2009). Professional commitment, patient safety, and patient-perceived care quality. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(3), 301–309.Google Scholar
  99. Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(2), 5–19.Google Scholar
  100. Timmermans, S. (2002). The cause of death vs. the gift of life: Boundary maintenance and the politics of expertise in death investigation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24(5), 550–574.Google Scholar
  101. Tjosvold, D., & Poon, M. (1998). Dealing with scarce resources: Open-minded interaction for resolving budget conflicts. Group & Organization Management, 23(3), 237–258.Google Scholar
  102. Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547.Google Scholar
  103. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 29–51.Google Scholar
  104. van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.Google Scholar
  105. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. l. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 515–541.Google Scholar
  106. Wang, L., Tao, H., Ellenbecker, C. H., & Liu, X. (2012). Job satisfaction, occupational commitment and intent to stay among Chinese nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(3), 539–549.Google Scholar
  107. Waring, J., & Currie, G. (2009). Managing expert knowledge: Organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. Organization Studies, 30(7), 755–778.Google Scholar
  108. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.Google Scholar
  109. Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 256–265.Google Scholar
  110. Weyman, A., Meadows, P., & Buckingham, A. (2013). Extending working life. Audit of research relating to impacts on NHS Employees. Retrieved from London.Google Scholar
  111. Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Narayanan, V., Narayanan, V., Baburaj, Y., Baburaj, Y., & Swaminathan, S. (2016). Team mental model characteristics and performance in a simulation experiment. Management Research Review, 39(8), 899–924.Google Scholar
  112. Yar, M., Dix, D., & Bajekal, M. (2006). Socio-demographic characteristics of the healthcare workforce in England and Wales. Health Statistics Quarterly, 32(Winter).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations