Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 39–53 | Cite as

Work-Family Behavioral Role Conflict: Scale Development and Validation

  • Malissa A. ClarkEmail author
  • Rebecca J. Early
  • Boris B. Baltes
  • Daniel Krenn
Original Paper

Abstract

Common measures of work-family conflict focus on a person’s perception of conflict. However, these perceptual measures may not provide a complete picture of the range of specific instances of conflict individuals may experience. In the present study, we developed a psychometrically sound assessment of work-family behavioral role conflict through a multi-study process. In phase 1, an inductive approach was used to identify a list of specific behavioral instances of work-family conflict (both work-to-family and family-to-work) through focus group interviews. In phase 2, we reduced the total number of scale items, by eliminating behavioral items with importance scores below a minimum cutoff. In phase 3, we further reduced the total number of scale items and examined the intercorrelations between our new measure and two widely used perceptual measures of work-family conflict. Finally, in phase 4, we examined the incremental validity of the final behavioral measure above and beyond the most widely used measure of perceptions of work-family conflict (i.e., Carlson, Kacmar, & Williams, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276, 2000). Results indicate that the work-family behavioral role conflict scale explained a significant amount of incremental variance over a perceptual measure of work-family conflict for several important outcomes, including turnover, psychological strain, burnout, and depression. Overall, this study illustrates the benefit of assessing behavioral incidences of work-family conflict in addition to assessing perceptions of work-family conflict.

Keywords

Work-family conflict Scale development Measurement Behavioral checklist Behavioral role conflict 

References

  1. Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D. (2012). The work and family interface. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1163–1198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308.Google Scholar
  4. Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, F., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 901–911.Google Scholar
  6. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.Google Scholar
  7. Boroff, K. E., & Lewin, D. (1997). Loyalty, voice and intent to exit a union firm: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 51, 50–63.Google Scholar
  8. Bruck, C. S., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2002). The relation between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: A finer-grained analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 336–353.Google Scholar
  9. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.Google Scholar
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010). Employment characteristics of families. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ famee_03242011.pdf.
  11. Carlson, D. S. (1999). Personality and role variables as predictors of three forms of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 236–253.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidemensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., & Sliter, M. (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk in organizational psychology: An evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 347–361.Google Scholar
  14. Comeau, J. A. (2012). Race/ethnicity and family contact: Toward a behavioral measure of familialism. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34, 251–268.Google Scholar
  15. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277.Google Scholar
  16. Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60–74.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155–174.Google Scholar
  18. Friede, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2005). The importance of the individual: How self-evaluations influence the work-family interface. In Ellen Ernst Kossek, Susan J. Lambert (Ed.) Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 193–209). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. (1992). Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 723–729.Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER.Google Scholar
  21. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224.Google Scholar
  22. Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E. (2006), Health consequences of work-family conflict: The dark side of the work-family interface. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.) Employee health, coping and methodologies (research in occupational stress and well-being, volume 5) (pp. 61–98). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  23. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.Google Scholar
  24. Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marín, A., Carrillo, L., Burke, B., Coates, M. L., & Quandt, S. A. (2007). Work-family conflict: Experiences and health implications among immigrant Latinos. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1119–1130.Google Scholar
  25. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.Google Scholar
  26. Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 419–436.Google Scholar
  27. Huang, J. L., Cropanzano, R., Li, A., Shao, P., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2017). Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice role compliance: A three-study investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000248.
  28. Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.Google Scholar
  29. Kopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connolly, T. F. (1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 198–215.Google Scholar
  30. Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 352–369.Google Scholar
  31. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–149.Google Scholar
  32. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 704–730.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013, September). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
  34. Leiter, M. P., & Durup, M. J. (1996). Work, home, and in-between: A longitudinal study of spillover. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 29–47.Google Scholar
  35. MacCallum, R. C., & Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 533–541.Google Scholar
  36. Matthews, R. A., Kath, L. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). A short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: Item selection and scale validation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 75–90.Google Scholar
  37. McGonagle, A. K., Huang, J. L., & Walsh, B. M. (2016). Insufficient effort survey responding: An underappreciated problem in work and organizational health psychology research. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65, 287–321.Google Scholar
  38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410.Google Scholar
  40. O’Driscoll, M. P., Ilgen, D. R., & Hildreth, K. (1992). Time devoted to job and off-job activities, interrole conflict, and affective experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 272–279.Google Scholar
  41. Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Herleman, H. A., Britt, T. W., Moore, D. D., Castro, C. A., & McGurk, D. (2013). Family-supportive work environments and psychological strain: A longitudinal test of two theories. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 27–36.Google Scholar
  42. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.Google Scholar
  43. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
  44. Ran, S., Liu, M., Marchiondo, L. A., & Huang, J. L. (2015). Difference in response effort across sample types: Perception or reality? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8, 202–208.Google Scholar
  45. Saad, L. (2014, August 29). The “40-hour” workweek is actually longer—by seven hours. Gallup.com. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/175286/hour-workweek-actually-longer-seven-hours.aspx.
  46. Shirom, A. (1989). Burnout in work organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 26–48). NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, A. (2012). The best (and worst) of mobile connectivity. Retrieved from Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project Website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/30/the-best-and-worst-of-mobile-connectivity/.
  48. Voydanoff, P. (2004). The effects of work demands and resources on work-to-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 398–412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malissa A. Clark
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rebecca J. Early
    • 2
  • Boris B. Baltes
    • 3
  • Daniel Krenn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.AlixPartners, LLPSouthfieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations