Advertisement

LMX and Attributions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives: When is Citizenship Perceived as Brownnosing?

  • Wm. Matthew Bowler
  • Jeffrey B. PaulEmail author
  • Jonathon R. Halbesleben
Original Paper
  • 433 Downloads

Abstract

This study tests the potential negative impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality on perceptions of followers’ motives to perform organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Based on the OCB motives introduced and tested by Rioux and Penner (Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314, 2001), structural equation modeling using matched-pair data from follower-leader-coworker triads was used to test a model proposed by (Bowler, Halbesleben, and Paul Human Resource Management Review, 20, 309–316 2010) of the double-bind faced by those in low- or high-quality LMX relationships. Followers have their OCB motives attributed to positive pro-social values and organizational concern motives or, alternatively to, negative impression management motives based solely on the point of view of the observer. The first double-bind occurs in that third-party observers attribute the OCB performance motives of followers in high-quality LMX relationships to impression management motives. This puts high LMX followers in a double-bind in that while performing OCB is encouraged and positive, such behavior is seen as self-serving by coworkers. This can lead to followers being labeled as brownnosers by coworkers, among other descriptors. The second double-bind occurs when employees in low-quality LMX relationships have their OCB attributed negatively by their leader. This makes it difficult for employees to develop LMX with their leader. We discuss the implications of the study and outcomes for future research on LMX and OCB motives along with recommendations for practitioners for handling the potential dark side of LMX relationships.

Keywords

Leader-member exchange (LMX) Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) Motives Impression management Leadership Matched pairs Brownnose Organizational politics Attribution theory 

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Banki, S. (2010). Is a good deed constructive regardless of intent? Organization citizenship behavior, motive, and group outcomes. Small Group Research, 41(3), 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, B., & Crant, J. M. (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11, 648–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, J. A. H., & O’Hair, H. D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizen at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32, 1078–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron, D., Ostroff, C., Schroeder, T., & Block, C. (2014). The dual effects of organizational citizenship behavior: Relationships to research productivity and career outcomes in academe. Human Performance, 27, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowler, W. M., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Paul, J. B. (2010). If you’re close with the leader, you must be a brownnose: The role leader-member relationships in follower, leader, and coworker attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, J. L., & Rusbult, C. E. (2001). Attitude alignment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deluga, R. J., & Perry, J. T. (1994). The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges. Group and Organization Management, 19, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dockery, T. M., & Steiner, D. D. (1990). The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group and Organization Studies, 15, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donia, M. B., Johns, G., & Raja, U. (2016). Good soldier or good actor? Supervisor accuracy in distinguishing between selfless and self-serving OCB motives. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1–10.Google Scholar
  22. Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1379–1391.Google Scholar
  23. Eissa, G.M. (2012). The dysfunctional citizen: an organizational citizenship behavior: the effects of application of the conservation of resources theory, ethical values, justice, and organizational to investigate the dark side of organizational commitment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Feldman, J. M. (1986). A note on the statistical correction of halo error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferris, G. R., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Fedor, D. B., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Advances in attribution theory: An organizational perspective (pp. 231–252). DelRay Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (pp. 179–254). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the pro-social fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenberg, J., Ashton-James, C., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2007). Social comparison processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hackett, R., Farh, J. L., Song, L., & Lapierre, L. (2003). LMX and organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the links within and across Western and Chinese samples. Dealing with diversity. Volume in LMX Leadership: The Series: 219–263. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  33. Hackett, R. D., & Lapierre, L. M. (2004). A meta-analytical explanation of the relationship between LMX and OCB. Academy of Management Proceedings (Meeting Abstract Supplement), T1-T6.Google Scholar
  34. Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halbesleben, J. R. B., Bowler, W. M., Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2010). Organizational concern, prosocial values, or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1450–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (1998). Cognitive repairs: How organizations compensate for the shortcoming of individual learners. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–37.Google Scholar
  37. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiao, C., & Hackett, R.D. (2007). The effects of LMX on employee conceptualizations and display of OCB In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2007, No. 1, pp. 1-6). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kim, S., O’Neill, J. W., & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lapierre, L. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465.Google Scholar
  47. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72.Google Scholar
  48. Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & Hui, J. K. S. (2006). An investigation of leader-member-exchange effects on organizational citizenship behavior in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Management, 12, 5–24.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  51. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its true nature, antecedents, and consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan, J. J. (2001). Moral reasoning as a determinant of organizational citizenship behaviors: A study in the public accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spitzmuller, M., Van Dyne, L., & Ilies, R. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior: A review and extension of its nomological network. In J. Barling (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior, Micro approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 106–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  59. Tajfel, H. (1972). Some developments in European social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2(3), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating (pp. 25–29). IV: Journal of Applied Psychology.Google Scholar
  64. Van Dyne, L. I. N. N., & Ellis, J. B. (2004). Job creep: A reactance theory perspective on organizational citizenship behavior as over-fulfillment of obligations. The employment relationship: Examining psychological and contextual perspectives, 181–205.Google Scholar
  65. Vecchio, R. (2005). Explorations in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vonk, R. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wagner, S. L., & Rush, M. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, disposition, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46, 1431–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82–111.Google Scholar
  71. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  72. Wheeler, A. R., Shanine, K. K., Leon, M. R., & Whitman, M. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes towards human nature. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 373–412). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wm. Matthew Bowler
    • 1
  • Jeffrey B. Paul
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jonathon R. Halbesleben
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management; Spears School of BusinessOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Care Management; Culverhouse College of CommerceThe University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations