The association of firearm laws with firearm outcomes among children and adolescents: a scoping review
- 399 Downloads
We conducted a scoping review to determine the current state of knowledge and areas for advancements in research on the association of firearm laws with child and adolescent firearm-related outcomes. We queried Scopus, EMBASE, Pubmed, and CJ Abstracts for English language original empirical research articles on policies affecting child and adolescent firearm-related outcomes published between January 1, 1985 and July 1, 2018. Data were abstracted, and methodologic quality assessed. Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. Among the policies studied were child access prevention laws (12 studies) and minimum age restrictions for firearm purchase and possession (4 studies). Outside of child access prevention laws, which are associated with reductions in child and adolescent unintentional and firearm suicide deaths, there is, at best, equivocal evidence of policy effects. This area is understudied, particularly in regard to nonfatal firearm injuries, for which the lack of a national surveillance system hampers research efforts. Further rigorous firearm policy evaluations are needed.
KeywordsFirearm policy Homicide Suicide Scoping review
We would like to thank Lynn Massey for her assistance in motivating us and helping us work out all the logistical and technical aspects of conducting the review. We would like to thank Judith E. Smith, Informationist at the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, for creating and conducting the search strategies.
This review was funded by NIH/NICHD 1R24HD087149-01A1. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
April M. Zeoli, Jason Goldstick, Amanda Mauri, Mikaela Wallin, Monika Goyal and Rebecca Cunningham have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2016). Why the NIS should not be used to make state-level estimates. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Retrieved November 11, 2018 from www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nis_statelevelestimates.jsp
- Briss, P. A., Zaza, S., Pappaioanou, M., Fielding, J., Wright-De Agüero, L., Truman, B. I., et al. (2000). Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1S), 35–43.Google Scholar
- Carter, P. M., Cook, L. J., May, M. L., Zonfrillo, M. R., Stanley, R. M., Chamberlain, J. M., et al. (2017). Individual and neighborhood characteristics of children seeking emergency department care for firearm injuries within the PECARN Network. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24, 803–813.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2018). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online]. www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars
- Corporation, R. A. N. D. (2018). The science of gun policy: A critical synthesis of research evidence on the effects of gun policies in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. (2017). FBI releases 2016 NIBRS Crime statistics in report and CDE, promotes transition of agencies. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2016/resource-pages/nibrs-2016_summary.pdf
- Webster, D. W. (2018). A critical gap in gun violence data. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from https://americanhealth.jhu.edu/article/critical-gap-gun-violence-data
- Zeoli, A. M., McCourt, A., Buggs, S., Frattaroli, S., Lilley, D., & Webster, D. W. (2018). Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their associations with intimate partner homicide. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187, 2365–2371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar