Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 674–680 | Cite as

Bolstering gun injury surveillance accuracy using capture–recapture methods

  • Lori Ann PostEmail author
  • Zev Balsen
  • Richard Spano
  • Federico E. Vaca
Article

Abstract

Using a single source of data, such as police records, or combining data from multiple sources results in an undercount of gun-related injuries. To improve gun-related injury surveillance accuracy by using capture–recapture methods, data were culled from law enforcement, emergency departments, emergency medical services, media, and medical examiner records. The data overlap was operationalized using capture–recapture to generate estimates of uncounted gun incidents. Dependencies between data sources were controlled using log-linear modeling for accurate estimates. New Haven, Connecticut. The study population included subjects injuried/killed from a gun projectile. Incidence was measured using capture–recapture. 49 gun injuries occurred within the defined geography. No single source recorded more than 43 gun-related injuries/deaths. Log-linear modeling estimated the actual number of injuries to be 49.1 (95% CI 49–49.9). Capture–recapture may be less useful in large metropolitan areas that cross state geographical boundaries because of how government agency data are aggregated within each state. No single data source achieves complete gun-related case ascertainment. Log-linear and capture–recapture methods significantly improve gun-related injury estimates.

Keywords

Gun violence Firearm violence Gun injury surveillance Gun case definition 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Lori Ann Post, Zev Balsen, Richard Spano, and Federico E. Vaca declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Ethical standards

This study relied on secondary data analysis and thus informed consent was unnecessary. All identifiers were deleted from database and data only are presented in the aggregate. There were no human participants or animals. This study was reviewed and approved by Northwestern and Yale Universities, and University of New Haven IRBs as it was exempt. This study was unfunded.

References

  1. Bohning, D., van der Heijden, P. G., & Bunge, J. (2017). Capture–recapture methods for the social and medical sciences. Cambridge: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckland, S. T., & Morgan, B. J. (2016). 50-year anniversary of papers by Cormack, Jolly and Seber. Statistical Science, 31, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CDC. (2018). WONDER: Underlying Cause of Death. Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2017. Retrieved from https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D76
  4. CDC. (2019). WISQARS nonfatal Injury Reports. Nonfatal Injury Reports, 20002016. Retrieved from https://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates.html
  5. Charette, Y., & van Koppen, V. (2016). A capture–recapture model to estimate the effects of extra-legal disparities on crime funnel selectivity and punishment avoidance. Security Journal, 29, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duquet, N., & Alstein, M. V. (2015). Firearms and violent deaths in Europe. Retrieved from Europe: https://www.vlaamsvredesinstituut.eu/sites/vlaamsvredesinstituut.eu/files/files/reports/firearms_and_violent_deaths_in_europe_web.pdf
  7. Feldman, J. M., Gruskin, S., Coull, B. A., & Krieger, N. (2017). Quantifying underreporting of law-enforcement-related deaths in United States vital statistics and news-media-based data sources: A capture–recapture analysis. PLoS Medicine, 14, e1002399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabor, T. (2016). Confronting gun violence in America. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garcia, M. (2011). Creating a healthy and safe city: The impact of violence in New Haven. Retrieved from New Haven, CT:Google Scholar
  10. Gold, S. J., Wibert, W. N., Bondartsova, V., Biroscak, B. J., & Post, L. A. (2015). A capture–recapture approach to estimation of refugee populations. International Migration, 53, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grinshteyn, E., & Hemenway, D. (2016). Violent death rates: the US compared with other high-income OECD countries, 2010. The American Journal of Medicine, 129, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hemenway, D. (1996). Survey research and self-defense gun use: An explanation of extreme overestimates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kellermann, A. L., Rivara, F. P., Lee, R. K., Banton, J. G., Cummings, P., Hackman, B. B., et al. (1996). Injuries due to firearms in three cities. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1438–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellermann, A. L., Rivara, F. P., Rushforth, N. B., Banton, J. G., Reay, D. T., Francisco, J. T., et al. (1993). Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1084–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleck, G. (2017a). Point blank: Guns and violence in America. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleck, G. (2017b). Targeting guns: Firearms and their control. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller, T. R., Lawrence, B. A., Carlson, N. N., Hendrie, D., Randall, S., Rockett, I. R., et al. (2016). Perils of police action: a cautionary tale from US data sets. Injury Prevention, injuryprev-2016-042023.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council. (2005). Firearms and violence: A critical review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pah, A., Hagan, J., Jennings, A., Jain, A., Albrecht, K., Hockenberry, A., et al. (2017). Economic insecurity and the rise in gun violence at US schools. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Post, L. A., Mezey, N. J., Maxwell, C. D., & Rhodes, K. (2011). Using capture–recapture to estimate the prevalence of intimate partner violence: The gender symmetry debate. International Journal of Science in Society, 2, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rivest, L., & Baillargeon, S. (2014). Rcapture: Loglinear models for capture–recapture experiments. R package version 1.4-2.Google Scholar
  22. Rothman, E. F., Stoklosa, H., Baldwin, S. B., Chisolm-Straker, M., Kato Price, R., Atkinson, H. G., et al. (2017). Public health research priorities to address US human trafficking: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  23. Straus, M. A. (2017). Physical violence in American families: Incidence rates, causes, and trends. In Abused and battered (pp. 17–34). Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. US Cenus Bureau. (2019). American Community Survey. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Yale Department of Emergency MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.University of New HavenWest HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations