Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 440–451 | Cite as

Translation of basic research in cognitive science to HIV-risk: a randomized controlled trial

  • Alan W. StacyEmail author
  • Liesl A. Nydegger
  • Yusuke Shono


Many people enrolled in drug diversion programs are not receiving evidence-based prevention for HIV or hepatitis. This study translated basic research from cognitive science to increase screening for infection and condom use in this population. A parallel three-condition randomized trial was conducted in a drug diversion sample (N = 358), comparing a memory practice condition with two active control conditions. Outcomes were condom use frequency and testing for infection (hepatitis B/C, HIV). At 3-month follow-up, participants in the memory practice condition were at least twice as likely (OR = 2.10 or greater, p < .01) to self-report testing compared to those in the control conditions and also reported more frequent condom use compared to a health education condition [B = .37, t(1) = 2.02, p = .02]. Basic research on memory can be effectively translated to brief interventions on infection screening and risk prevention in existing drug diversion programs.


Cognitive science HIV/AIDS Hepatitis Screening Condom use 



The authors thank for their educational videos, Susan Ames, Jerry Grenard, and Peter Graf for advice about some of the procedures, and Amy Custer, Sulay Gomez, and Octavia Freeman for assistance with the manuscript, computer programming, and data collection.


Research reported in this publication was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse awarded to Alan Stacy (R01DA033871) and from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism awarded to Mary Larimar partially supporting Yusuke Shono (T32AA007455). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Alan W. Stacy, Liesl A. Nydegger and Yusuke Shono declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Abel, M. I., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2017). Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format. Memory and Cognition, 45, 81–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aletraris, L., & Roman, P. M. (2015). Provision of onsite HIV services in substance use disorder treatment programs: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 126–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branson, B. M., Handsfield, H. H., Lampe, M. A., Janssen, R. S., Taylor, A. W., Lyss, & S. B. (2006). Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. In WR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports/centers for disease control, 55(RR-14) (pp. 1–17).Google Scholar
  5. Caligiore, D., Mustile, M., Spalletta, G., & Baldassarre, G. (2017). Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 72, 210–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calsyn, D. A., Hatch-Maillette, M., Tross, S., Doyle, S. R., Crits-Christoph, P., Song, Y. S., et al. (2009). Motivational and skills training HIV/sexually transmitted infection sexual risk reduction groups for men. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37, 138–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castor, D., Pilowsky, D. J., Hadden, B., Fuller, C., Ompad, D. C., de Leon, C. L., et al. (2010). Sexual risk reduction among non-injection drug users: Report of a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Care, 22, 62–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). HIV in the United States: At a glance. Retrieved from Accessed June 14, 2018.
  9. Crawford, N. D., & Vlahov, D. (2010). Progress in HIV reduction and prevention among injection and noninjection drug users. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 55, S87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darke, S., Hall, W., Heather, N., Ward, J., & Wodak, A. (1991). The reliability and validity of a scale to measure HIV risk-taking behaviour among intravenous drug users. Aids, 5, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Des Jarlais, D. C., Arasteh, K., Perlis, T., Hagan, H., Abdul-Quader, B., Heckathorn, D. D., et al. (2007). Convergence of HIV seroprevalence among injecting and non-injecting drug users in New York City. AIDS, 21, 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donenberg, G. R., Emerson, E., Bryant, F. B., Wilson, H., & Weber-Shifrin, E. (2001). Understanding AIDS-risk behavior among adolescents in psychiatric care: Links to psychopathology and peer relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 642–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festinger, D. S., Dugosh, K. L., Kurth, A. E., & Metzger, D. S. (2016). Examining the efficacy of a computer facilitated HIV prevention tool. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 162, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Festinger, D. S., Dugosh, K. L., Metzger, D. S., & Marlowe, D. B. (2012). The prevalence of HIV risk behaviors among felony drug court participants. Drug Court Review, 8, 131–146.Google Scholar
  15. Fishbein, D. H., Ridenour, T. A., Stahl, M., & Sussman, S. (2016). The full translational spectrum of prevention science: Facilitating the transfer of knowledge to practices and policies that prevent behavioral health problems. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6, 5–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Global Life Works. (2012). Collaborations. Retrieved from Accessed August 1, 2012.
  17. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 930–940. Google Scholar
  19. Graham, J. W., Flay, B. R., Johnson, C. A., Hansen, W. B., Grossman, L., & Sobel, J. (1984). Reliability of self-report measures of drug use in prevention research: Evaluation of the project SMART questionnaire via the test-retest reliability matrix. Journal of Drug Education, 14, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henke, K. (2010). A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 523–532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hovington, C. L., & Brouwer, B. (2010). Guided motor imagery in healthy adults and stroke: Does strategy matter?. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 851–857. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hser, Y.-I., Teruya, C., Evans, E. A., Longshore, D., Grella, C., & Farabee, D. (2003). Treating drug-abusing offenders: Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes. Evaluation Review, 27, 479–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan, R., Bush, D., Bisby, J. A., Horner, A. J., Meyer, S. S., & Burgess, N. (2017). Medial prefrontal-medial temporal theta phase coupling in dynamic spatial imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 507–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 157–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 635–642. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Longshore, D., Urada, D., Evans, E., Hser, Y., Prendergast, M., & Hawken, A. (2005). Evaluation of substance abuse and crime prevention act: 2004 report. Los Angeles, CA: Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, California Health and Human Services Agency.Google Scholar
  27. McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. (2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory and Cognition, 38, 221–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nydegger, L. A., Ames, S. L., & Stacy, A. W. (2017). Predictive utility and measurement properties of the Strength of Implementation Intentions Scale (SIIS) for condom use. Social Science and Medicine, 185, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson, J. L., Milam, J., McCutchan, A., Stoyanoff, S., Bolan, R., Weiss, J., et al. (2004). Effect of brief safer-sex counseling by medical providers to HIV-1 seropositive patients: A multi-clinic assessment. Aids, 18, 1179–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robin, N., Dominique, L., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., Guillot, A., & Le Her, M. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roediger, H. L., III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shoptaw, S., Montgomery, B., Williams, C. T., El-Bassel, N., Aramrattana, A., Metsch, L., et al. (2013). Not just the needle: The state of HIV prevention science among substance users and future directions. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 63, S174–S178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tross, S., Campbell, A. N., Cohen, L. R., Calsyn, D., Pavlicova, M., Miele, G. M., et al. (2008). Effectiveness of HIV/STD sexual risk reduction groups for women in substance abuse treatment programs: Results of NIDA clinical trials network trial. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 48, 581–589. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Underhill, K., Dumont, D., & Operario, D. (2014). HIV prevention for adults with criminal justice involvement: A systematic review of HIV risk-reduction interventions in incarceration and community settings. American Journal of Public Health, 104, e27–e53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, R. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Workowski, K. A., Berman, S., & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. In MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and Reports/Centers for Disease Control, 59(RR-12) (pp. 1–110).Google Scholar
  38. Zuckerman, M. D., & Boyer, E. W. (2012). HIV and club drugs in emerging adulthood. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 24, 219–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Community and Global HealthClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Health EducationUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations