Identifying Community-Based Reinforcers of Adults with Autism and Related Disabilities
A forced-choice preference assessment using pictures and no access upon selection was used to determine preferences for community-based activities with 4 young adults with autism and intellectual disability. High- and low-preference activities were then provided as delayed consequences, using a token economy, for completion of vocational tasks in a concurrent operants paradigm. All participants responded to the contingency associated with earning the high-preference activity and away from the contingency associated with earning the low-preference activity. The results suggest that a pictorial assessment without access is a valid method for identifying community-based activities that will function as reinforcers. This efficient protocol could improve treatment efficacy in applied settings.
KeywordsPreference assessment Concurrent operants assessment Reinforcer assessment
The authors would like to thank Ashley Williams, Melissa Kelly, Izumi Nishida, and Lisa Goldthwaite for their assistance with data collection and interobserver agreement data. This research was based on a doctoral dissertation by the first author toward completion of a Ph.D. degree in Applied Behavior Analysis.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Daniel Almeida declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ronald Allen declares that he has no conflict of interest. Russell Maguire declares he has no conflict of interest. Kaitlin Maguire declares she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, D. C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar