Using a Tablet Device to Examine Effects of Varied Reinforcement and Preference
- 19 Downloads
The present study examined effects of providing varied reinforcement versus constant reinforcement using an iPad and applications (apps). Participants included three typically developing children in a school setting. We conducted a preference assessment to identify highly preferred and moderately preferred apps. We then conducted a concurrent chains assessment to examine responding for varied moderately preferred content or constant highly preferred content. Although participants demonstrated different response patterns, all participants responded to gain access to varied moderately preferred reinforcement more than constant highly preferred reinforcement although preference for content alone would not have predicted this outcome. This research has implications for using high-tech devices (i.e., iPads) as reinforcers in educational settings.
KeywordsConstant reinforcement iPad Technology Varied reinforcement
The authors wish to thank Stephanie Mattson and Jason Lee for their valuable contributions to conducting this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Burke, R. V., Andersen, M. N., Bowen, S. L., Howard, M. R., & Allen, K. D. (2010). Evaluation of two instruction methods to increase employment options for young adults with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crawford, S., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2015). The use of mobile digital technology and iPod touches in physical education. In Y. Zhang (Ed.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. E., et al. (2012). Teaching picture naming to two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders using systematic instruction and speech-generating devices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M., Mulloy, A., et al. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650110379633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koehler, L. J., Iwata, B. A., Roscoe, E. M., Rolider, N. U., & O’Steen, L. E. (2005). Effects of stimulus variation on the reinforcing capability of nonpreferred stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2005.102-04.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Murphy, E. S., McSweeney, F. K., Smith, R. G., & McComas, J. J. (2003). Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Neely, L., Rispoli, M., Camargo, S., Davis, H., & Boles, M. (2013). The effect of instructional use of an iPad® on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two students with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pew Internet, & American Life Project. (2018). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from February 8, 2018, from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
- Steinman, W. M. (1968b). Response rate and varied reinforcement: Reinforcers of different strengths. Psychonomic Science, 10, 36.Google Scholar