Advertisement

Phytosterol containing diet increases plasma and whole body concentration of phytosterols in apoE-KO but not in LDLR-KO mice

  • Valéria Sutti NunesEmail author
  • Patrícia Miralda Cazita
  • Sérgio Catanozi
  • Edna Regina Nakandakare
  • Eder Carlos Rocha Quintão
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Phytosterol metabolism is unknown in the hypercholesterolemia of genetic origin. We investigated the metabolism of phytosterols in a cholesterol-free, phytosterol-containing standard diet in hypercholesterolemic mice knockouts for low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and apolipoprotein E (apoE) mice compared to wild-type mice (controls). Phytosterols were measured in mice tissues by GCMS. ApoE-KO mice absorbed less phytosterols than LDLR-KO and the latter absorbed less phytosterols than control mice, because the intestinal campesterol content was low in both KO mice, and sitosterol was low in the intestine in apoE-KO mice as compared to LDLR-KO mice. Although the diet contained nine times more sitosterol than campesterol, the concentration of sitosterol was lower than that of campesterol in plasma in LDLR-KO, and in the liver in controls and in LDLR-KO, but only in apoE-KO. On the other hand, in the intestine sitosterol was higher than campesterol in controls, and in LDLR-KO but with a tendency only in apoE-KO. Because of the high dietary supply of sitosterol, sitosterol was better taken up by the intestine than campesterol, but the amount of sitosterol was lower than that of campesterol in the liver, while in the whole body the amounts of these phytosterols do not differ from each other. Therefore, via intestinal lymph less sitosterol than campesterol was transferred to the body. However, as compared to controls, in apoE-KO mice, but not in LDLR-KO mice, the increase in campesterol and sitosterol in plasma and in the whole body indicating that apoE-KO mice have a marked defect in the elimination of both phytosterols from the body.

Keywords

Knockout mice Phytosterols Hypercholesterolemia Apo E knockout mice Low density lipoprotein receptor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), São Paulo, Brazil (grant number: 2015-17566-2). The authors express their gratitude to Mr. Antônio dos Santos (Centro de Manutenção e Experimentação de Animais da Clínica Médica, Disciplina de Reumatologia FMUSP) for providing animal care and Monique de Fátima Mello and Francisca Elda Batista (Laboratório de Lipides, LIM-10, HCFMUSP) for their technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. Andersson SW, Skinner J, Ellegård L, Welch AA, Bingham S, Mulligan A, Andersson H, Shaw KT (2004) Intake of dietary plant sterols is inversely related to serum cholesterol concentration in men and women in the EPIC Norfolk population: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:1378–1385.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baila-Rueda L, Pérez-Ruiz MR, Jarauta E, Tejedor MT, Mateo-Gallego R, Lamiquiz-Moneo I, de Castro-Orós I, Cenarro A, Civeira F (2016) Cosegregation of serum cholesterol with cholesterol intestinal absorption markers in families with primary hypercholesterolemia without mutations in LDLR, APOB, PCSK9 and APOE genes. Atherosclerosis 246:202–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharyya AK (1981) Uptake and esterification of plant sterols by rat small intestine. Am J Phys 240:G50–G55Google Scholar
  4. Bombo RPA, Afonso MS, Machado RM, Lavrador MSF, Nunes VS, Quintão ER, Koike M, Catanozi S, Lin CJ, Nakandakare ER, Lottenberg AM (2013) Dietary phytosterol does not accumulate in the arterial wall and prevents atherosclerosis of LDLr-KO mice. Atherosclerosis 231:442–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calandra S, Tarugi P, Bertolini S (2017) Impact of rare variants in autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia causing genes. Curr Opin Lipidol 28:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grundy SM, Ahrens EH Jr, Davignon J (1969) The interaction of cholesterol absorption and cholesterol synthesis in man. J Lipid Res 10:304–315Google Scholar
  7. Gylling H, Miettinen TA (2005) The effect of plant stanol- and sterol-enriched foods on lipid metabolism, serum lipids and coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Biochem 42:254–263.  https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563054255605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gylling H, Plat J, Turley S, Ginsberg HN, Ellegård L, Jessup W, Jones PJ, Lütjohann D, Maerz W, Masana L, Silbernagel G, Staels B, Borén J, Catapano AL, de Backer G, Deanfield J, Descamps OS, Kovanen PT, Riccardi G, Tokgözoglu L, Chapman MJ, European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel on Phytosterols (2014) Plant sterols and plant stanols in the management of dyslipidaemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 232:346–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamada T, Goto H, Yamahira T, Sugawara T, Imaizumi K, Ikeda I (2006) Solubility in and affinity for the bile salt micelle of plant sterols are important determinants of their intestinal absorption in rats. Lipids 41:551–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-006-5004-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Köhler J, Teupser D, Elsässer A, Weingärtner O (2017) Plant sterol enriched functional food and atherosclerosis. Br J Pharmacol 174:1281–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lupattelli G, Pirro M, Siepi D, Mannarino MR, Roscini AR, Vaudo G, Pasqualini L, Schillaci G, Mannarino E (2012) Non-cholesterol sterols in different forms of primary hyperlipemias. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 22:231–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2010.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martins CM, Fonseca FA, Ballus CA, Figueiredo-Neto AM, Meinhart AD, de Godoy HT, Izar MC (2013) Common sources and composition of phytosterols and their estimated intake by the population in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Nutrition 29:865–871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthan NR, Pencina M, LaRocque JM et al (2009) Alterations in cholesterol absorption/synthesis markers characterize Framingham offspring study participants with CHD. J Lipid Res 50:1927–1935.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.P900039-JLR200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miettinen TA, Klett EL, Gylling H, Isoniemi H, Patel SB (2006) Liver transplantation in a patient with sitosterolemia and cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 130:542–547.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miettinen TA, Gylling H, Nissinen MJ (2011) The role of serum non-cholesterol sterols as surrogate markers of absolute cholesterol synthesis and absorption. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 21:765–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moghadasian MH, Nguyen LB, Shefer S, Salen G, Batta AK, Frohlich JJ (2001) Hepatic cholesterol and bile acid synthesis, low-density lipoprotein receptor function, and plasma and fecal sterol levels in mice: effects of apolipoprotein E deficiency and probucol or phytosterol treatment. Metabolism 50:708–714.  https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2001.23303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moruisi K, Oosthuizen WOA (2006) Phytosterols/stanols lower cholesterol concentrations in familial hypercholesterolemic subjects: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Am Coll Nutr 25:45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mymin D, Salen G, Triggs-Raine B, Waggoner DJ, Dembinski T, Hatch GM (2018) The natural history of phytosterolemia: observations on its homeostasis. Atherosclerosis 269:122–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Research Council (2011) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edn. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.  https://doi.org/10.17226/12910
  20. Nunes VS, Leança CC, Panzoldo NB et al (2011) HDL-C concentration is related to markers of absorption and of cholesterol synthesis: Study in subjects with low vs. high HDL-C. Clin Chim Acta.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.09.039
  21. Nunes VS, Cazita PM, Catanozi S, Nakandakare ER, Quintão ECR (2018) Decreased content, rate of synthesis and export of cholesterol in the brain of apoE knockout mice. J Bioenerg Biomembr 50:283–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-018-9757-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ooi EMM, Janus ED, Grant SJ, Sinclair LMT, R.Barrett PH (2010) Effect of apolipoprotein E genotype on apolipoprotein B-100 metabolism in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects. J Lipid Res 51:2413–2421.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M004705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osono Y, Woollett LA, Herz J, Dietschy JM (1995) Role of the low density lipoprotein receptor in the flux of cholesterol through the plasma and across the tissues of the mouse. J Clin Invest 95:1124–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plat J, de Jong A, Volger OL, Princen HMG, Mensink RP (2008) Preferential campesterol incorporation into various tissues in apolipoprotein E*3-Leiden mice consuming plant sterols or stanols. Metabolism 57:1241–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2008.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rysz J, Franczyk B, Olszewski R, Banach M, Gluba-Brzozka A (2017) The use of plant sterols and stanols as lipid-lowering agents in cardiovascular disease. Curr Pharm Des 23:2488–2495.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666170316112344 Google Scholar
  26. Samuel P, McNamara DJ (1983) Differential absorption of exogenous and endogenous cholesterol in man. J Lipid Res 24:265–276Google Scholar
  27. Simonen P, Gylling H, Miettinen TA (2008) The validity of serum squalene and non-cholesterol sterols as surrogate markers of cholesterol synthesis and absorption in type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 197:883–888.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sioen I, Matthys C, Huybrechts I, van Camp J, de Henauw S (2011) Consumption of plant sterols in Belgium: estimated intakes and sources of naturally occurring plant sterols and β-carotene. Br J Nutr 105:960–966.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510004587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stellaard F, von Bergmann K, Sudhop T, Lütjohann D (2017) The value of surrogate markers to monitor cholesterol absorption, synthesis and bioconversion to bile acids under lipid lowering therapies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 169:111–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.03.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang W, Ma Y, Jia L, Ioannou YA, Davies JP, Yu L (2009) Genetic inactivation of NPC1L1 protects against sitosterolemia in mice lacking ABCG5/ABCG8. J Lipid Res 50:293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M800439-JLR200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Von Bergmann K, Sudhop T, Lütjohann D (2005) Cholesterol and plant sterol absorption: recent insights. Am J Cardiol 96:10–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang J, Mitsche MA, Lütjohann D, Cohen JC, Xie XS, Hobbs HH (2015) Relative roles of ABCG5/ABCG8 in liver and intestine. J Lipid Res 56:319–330.  https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M054544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weingärtner O, Teupser D, Patel SB (2015) The atherogenicity of plant sterols: the evidence from genetics to clinical trials. J AOAC Int 98:742–749.  https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.SGEWeingartner CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Woollett LA, Osono Y, Herz J, Dietschy JM (1995) Apolipoprotein E competitively inhibits receptor-dependent low density lipoprotein uptake by the liver but has no effect on cholesterol absorption or synthesis in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:12500–12504.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.26.12500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Lipides, LIM-10, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations