Advertisement

Executive Functioning Correlates of DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits: Initial Evidence from an Italian Sample of Consecutively Admitted Adult Outpatients

  • Andrea Fossati
  • Antonella Somma
  • Serena Borroni
  • Kristian E. Markon
  • Robert F. Krueger
Article
  • 132 Downloads

Abstract

In order to evaluate the associations between computer-administered tasks of executive functioning (EF), and maladaptive personality domains and traits listed in DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders, 53 consecutively admitted psychotherapy outpatients (female participants: n = 27, 50.9%; male participants: n = 26, 49.1%; participants’ mean age = 37.28 years, SD = 11.50 years) were administered the Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) EF tasks and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). According to rank-order correlation analyses, a number of non-negligible and specific associations were observed between selected PID-5 scales and indices of participants’ performance on EF tasks. MM robust regression models showed that participants’ performance on computer-administered EF tasks explained a non-negligible amount of variance in selected PID-5 scale scores (median R2 value = .17). As a whole, our trait-level analyses of PID-5 dimensions suggest the clinical usefulness of integrating self-reports and EF laboratory tasks in routine clinical assessment.

Keywords

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Executive functioning Psychotherapy outpatients 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Andrea Fossati, Antonella Somma, Serena Borroni, Kristian E. Markon, and Robert F. Krueger declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10862_2018_9645_MOESM1_ESM.docx (132 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 131 kb)

References

  1. Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the personality inventory for DSM–5 (PID–5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 62–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, K., Deane, K., Lindley, D., Loucks, B., & Veach, E. (2012). The effects of time of day and practice on cognitive abilities: The PEBL tower of London, trail-making, and switcher tasks. PEBL Technical Report Series (On-line). Google Scholar
  6. Arnett, P. (2013). Secondary influences on neuropsychological test performance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.Google Scholar
  8. Avisar, A., & Shalev, L. (2011). Sustained attention and behavioral characteristics associated with ADHD in adults. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 107–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barkley, R. A. (1991). The ecological validity of laboratory and analogue assessments of ADHD symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 149–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. The Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bezdjian, S., Baker, L. A., Lozano, D. I., & Raine, A. (2009). Assessing inattention and impulsivity in children during the go/NoGo task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 365–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, A. M., Davalos, D. B., McCabe, D. P., & Troup, L. J. (2011). Executive functions and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 720–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Compton, R. J. (2000). Ability to disengage attention predicts negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comtois, K. A., Russo, J., Snowden, M., Srebnik, D., Ries, R., & Roy-Byrne, P. (2003). Factors associated with high use of public mental health services by persons with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1149–1154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Conners, C. K., Epstein, J. N., Angold, A., & Klaric, J. (2003). Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 555–562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  17. Denissen, J. J., Geenen, R., van Aken, M. A., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch translation of the big five inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Impulsivity as a personality trait. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 485–502). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. DeYoung, C. G., & Gray, J. R. (2009). Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior, and cognition. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 323–346). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825–858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Duckworth, A. L., & Kern, M. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Fertuck, E. A., Keilp, J., Song, I., Morris, M. C., Wilson, S. T., Brodsky, B. S., & Stanley, B. (2012). Higher executive control and visual memory performance predict treatment completion in borderline personality disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 38–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W., & Benjamin, L. (1994). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID II), Version 2.0. NY: Biometrics research department, NY state psychiatric institute.Google Scholar
  26. Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689–708.Google Scholar
  27. Friedman, N. P., Haberstick, B. C., Willcutt, E. G., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2007). Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence. Psychological Science, 18, 893–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Robinson, J. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Developmental trajectories in toddlers’ self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1410–1430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia-Villamisar, D., Dattilo, J., & Garcia-Martinez, M. (2017). Executive functioning in people with personality disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 30, 36–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldberg, L. R. (1980). Some ruminations about the structure of individual differences: Developing a common lexicon for the major characteristics of human personality. Paper presented at the meeting of theWestern Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
  31. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gratz, K. L., Rosenthal, M. Z., Tull, M. T., Lejuez, C. W., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006). An experimental investigation of emotion dysregulation in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 850–855.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Greenwood, K. E., Wykes, T., Sigmundsson, T., Landau, S., & Morris, R. G. (2011). Tower of London versus real life analogue planning in schizophrenia with disorganization and psychomotor poverty symptoms. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 474–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gvirts, H. Z., Harari, H., Braw, Y., Shefet, D., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Levkovitz, Y. (2012). Executive functioning among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and their relatives. Journal of Affective Disorders, 143, 261–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Rosseli, M., Workman, K. A., Santisi, M., Rios, J. D., & Bojan, D. (2002). Agreeableness, conscientiousness and effortful control processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 476–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Koller, M., & Stahel, W. A. (2011). Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55, 2504–2515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lieberman, M. D., & Rosenthal, R. (2001). Why introverts can’t always tell who likes them: Multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 294–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Linnenbrink, E. A., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of goals and affect in working memory functioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., . . . Shoda, Y. (2011). “Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693–2698.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Murdock, K. W., Oddi, K. B., & Bridgett, D. J. (2013). Cognitive correlates of personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muris, P., Bos, A. R., Mayer, B., Verkade, R., Thewissen, V., & Dell’Avvento, V. (2009). Relations among behavioral inhibition, big five personality factors, and anxiety disorder symptoms in nonclinical children. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Gorman, J. G., & Baxter, E. E. (2002). Self-control as a personality measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.Google Scholar
  52. Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Piper, B. J., Li, V., Eiwaz, M. A., Kobel, Y. V., Benice, T. S., Chu, A. M., et al. (2012). Executive function on the psychology experiment building language tests. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 110–123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11, 446–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rousseeuw, P.J., & Yohai, V.J. (1984). Robust regression by means of S-estimators. In: J. Franke, W. Härdle and R. D. Martin (eds.), Robust and nonlinear time series. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 256–272.Google Scholar
  56. Rousseeuw, P., Croux, C., Todorov, V., Ruckstuhl, A., Salibian-Barrera, M., Verbeke, T., Koller, M., & Maechler, M. (2015). Robustbase: basic robust statistics. R package version 0.92-5. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=robustbase.
  57. Ruocco, A. C., McCloskey, M. S., Lee, R., & Coccaro, E. F. (2009). Indices of orbitofrontal and prefrontal function in cluster B and cluster C personality disorders. Psychiatry Research, 170, 282–285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Savine, A. C., McDaniel, M. A., Shelton, J., & Scullin, M. K. (2011). A characterization of individual differences in prospective memory monitoring using the complex ongoing serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. A. (2014). Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 374–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Strickland, C. M., Drislane, L. E., Lucy, M., Krueger, R. F., & Patrick, C. J. (2013). Characterizing psychopathy using DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 327–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Suchy, Y. (2009). Executive functioning: Overview, assessment, and research issues for nonneuropsychologists. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 106–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Suzuki, T., Samuel, D. B., Pahlen, S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Suzuki, T., Griffin, S. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2017). Capturing the DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits in the five-factor model's nomological net. Journal of Personality, 85, 220–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Troyer, A. K., Leach, L., & Strauss, E. (2006). Aging and response inhibition: Normative data for the Victoria Stroop test. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Unoka, Z., & Richman, M. J. (2016). Neuropsychological deficits in BPD patients and the moderator effects of co-occurring mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 44, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistic of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 101–132.Google Scholar
  68. Widiger, T. A. (2011). The DSM-5 dimensional model of personality disorder: Rationale and empirical support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 222–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams, P. G., Suchy, Y., & Kraybill, M. L. (2010). Five-factor model personality traits and executive functioning among older adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yohai, V. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency estimates for regression. Annals of Statistics, 15, 642–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young, S. E., Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Willcutt, E. G., Corley, R. P., Haberstick, B. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2009). Behavioral disinhibition: Liability for externalizing spectrum disorders and its genetic and environmental relation to response inhibition across adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 117–130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Zimmerman, M. (1994). Diagnosing personality disorders. A review of issues and research methods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 225–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy UnitSan Raffaele Turro HospitalMilanItaly
  3. 3.University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  4. 4.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations