Confirmatory Validation and Measurement Equivalence of the Eating Loss of Control Scale in Binge Eating and Non-Clinical Samples
- 147 Downloads
Although Loss of Control (LOC) is a transdiagnostic factor in eating pathology, there are few standalone assessments of LOC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the uni-dimensionality and measurement equivalence of the Eating Loss of Control Scale (ELOCS). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to achieve a well-fitting uni-dimensional model in clinical (N = 226) and non-clinical (N = 476) samples. Measurement equivalence was tested in a factor analytic framework, and effect sizes were computed to evaluate the impact of non-equivalence. A well-fitting model was achieved in both samples after the removal of 4 items. The instrument showed configural equivalence but not metric equivalence. Results suggest that the ELOCS is a reliable and valid measure of LOC in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, while the nature of the LOC construct is similar across binge eating and non-clinical participants, comparisons of ELOCS across these groups are affected by measurement non-equivalence. This research also revealed novel insights into the relative sensitivity of model fitting and effect size approaches to investigating measurement equivalence.
KeywordsLoss of control Measurement equivalence Measurement invariance Assessment Eating disorder Binge eating
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Christopher J. Hopwood, Christopher D. Nye, Kerstin K. Blomquist, and Carlos M. Grilo declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. All procedures were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutions where the research was conducted and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Fourth ed., Text Revision ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc..Google Scholar
- Cooper, P. J., & Fairburn, C. G. (1993). Confusion over the core psychopathology of bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 13(4), 385-389.Google Scholar
- Elder, K. A., Paris, M., Añez, L. M., & Grilo, C. M. (2008). Loss of control over eating is associated with eating disorder psychopathology in a community sample of Latinas. Eating behaviors, 9(4), 501–503Google Scholar
- First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I), clinician version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S., & Rardin, D. (1982). The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addictive behaviors, 7(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, (1), 1–55.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409−426.Google Scholar
- Latner, J. D., Hildebrandt, T., Rosewall, J. K., Chisholm, A. M., & Hayashi, K. (2007). Loss of control over eating reflects eating disturbances and general psychopathology. Behaviour research and therapy, 45(9), 2203-2211.Google Scholar
- Nye, C. D. (2011). The development and evaluation of effect size measures for IRT and CFA studies of measurement equivalence [doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
- Nye, C. D., & Bialko, C. (2014). Does measurement nonequivalence really matter? In J. Ock & C. D. Nye (Chairs), The wild frontier of measurement invariance. Symposium presented at the 29th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
- Nye, C. D., Brummel, B. J., & Drasgow, F. (2010). Too good to be true? Understanding change in organizational outcomes. Journal of Management, (6), 1555–1577.Google Scholar
- Sonneville, K. R., Horton, N. J., Micali, N., Crosby, R. D., Swanson, S. A., Solmi, F., & Field, A. (2013). Longitudinal associations between binge eating and overating and adverse outcomes among adolescents and young adults: Does loss of control matter? Journal of the American Medical Association: Pediatrics, 167, 149–155.Google Scholar
- Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Marcus, M. D., Yanovski, S. Z., & Yanovski, J. A. (2008). Loss of control eating disorder in children age 12 years and younger: proposed research criteria. Eating behaviors, 9(3), 360–365.Google Scholar
- Vandenburg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4−70.Google Scholar
- White, M. A., Kalarchian, M. A., Masheb, R. M., Marcus, M. D., & Grilo, C. M. (2010). Loss of control over eating predicts outcomes in bariatric surgery: a prospective 24-month follow-up study. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 71(2), 175.Google Scholar