Determining methyl sidechain conformations in a CS-ROSETTA model using methyl 1H-13C residual dipolar couplings

  • Theodoros K. Karamanos
  • Vitali TugarinovEmail author
  • G. Marius CloreEmail author


Modelling of protein structures based on backbone chemical shifts, using programs such as CS-ROSETTA, is becoming increasingly popular, especially for systems where few restraints are available or where homologous structures are already known. While the reliability of CS-ROSETTA calculations can be improved by incorporation of some additional backbone NMR data such as those afforded by residual dipolar couplings or minimal NOE data sets involving backbone amide protons, the sidechain conformations are largely modelled by statistical energy terms. Here, we present a simple method based on methyl residual dipolar couplings that can be used to determine the rotameric state of the threefold symmetry axis of methyl groups that occupy a single rotamer, determine rotameric distributions, and identify regions of high flexibility. The method is demonstrated for methyl side chains of a deletion variant of the human chaperone DNAJB6b.


Sidechain conformation Residual dipolar couplings Methyl NMR Protein structure refinement CS-ROSETTA 



We thank Drs. James Baber, Jinfa Ying and Dan Garrett for technical support. This work was supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health (DK029023 to G.M.C.).

Supplementary material

10858_2019_294_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (605 kb)
Supplementary file 1 The pulse scheme used for recording the J-modulated interferograms (Fig. S1). Description of theoretical considerations involved in the interpretation of J-modulated interferograms of 13CH3 methyl groups in the presence of spin relaxation according to Eq. (2) (Fig. S2). A plot of values obtained for ΔST-DNAJB6b using the described analysis of J-modulated interferograms (Fig. S3). ‘Materials and Methods’ section describing the details of NMR sample preparation, NMR experiments and structure calculation protocols. (PDF 605 kb)


  1. Anthis NJ, Clore GM (2015) Visualizing transient dark states by NMR spectroscopy. Quart Rev Biophys 48:1–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chou JJ, Case DA, Bax A (2003) Insights into the mobility of methyl-bearing side chains in proteins from 3JCC and 3JCN couplings. J Am Chem Soc 125:8959–8966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clore GM, Garrett DS (1999) R-factor, free R, and complete cross-validation for dipolar coupling refinement of NMR structures. J Am Chem Soc 121:9008–9012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clore GM, Kuszewski J (2002) χ1 rotamer populations and angles of mobile surface side chains are accurately predicted by a torsion angle database potential of mean force. J Am Chem Soc 124:2866–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hansen DF, Kay LE (2011) Determining valine sidechain rotamer conformations in proteins from methyl 13C chemical shifts: application to the 360 kda half-proteasome. J Am Chem Soc 133:8272–8281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen DF, Neudecker P, Kay LE (2010a) Determination of isoleucine sidechain conformations in ground and excited states of proteins from chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 132:7589–7591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen DF, Neudecker P, Vallurupalli P, Mulder FAA, Kay LE (2010b) Determination of Leu sidechain conformations in excited protein states by NMR relaxation dispersion. J Am Chem Soc 132:42–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karamanos TK, Tugarinov V, Clore GM (2019) Unraveling the structure and dynamics of the human DNAJB6b chaperone by NMR reveals insights into HSP40-mediated proteostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:21529–21538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1996) Improving the quality of NMR and crystallographic protein structures by means of a conformational database potential derived from structure databases. Protein Sci 5:1067–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leaver-Fay A et al (2011) Rosetta3: An object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40:389–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mittermaier A, Kay LE (2001) χ1 torsion angle dynamics in proteins from dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 123:6892–6903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mittermaier A, Kay LE (2002) Effect of deuteration on some structural parameters of methyl groups in proteins as evaluated by residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 23:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neri D, Szyperski T, Otting G, Senn H, Wüthrich K (1989) Stereospecific nuclear magnetic resonance assignments of the methyl groups of valine and leucine in the DNA-binding domain of the 434 repressor by biosynthetically directed fractional carbon-13 labeling. Biochemistry 28:7510–7516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nerli S, McShan AC, Sgourakis NG (2018) Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination. Progr Nucl Magn Res Spec 106–107:1–25Google Scholar
  16. Ollerenshaw JE, Tugarinov V, Kay LE (2003) Methyl TROSY: Explanation and experimental verification. Magn Reson Chem 41:843–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ottiger M, Bax A (1999) How tetrahedral are methyl groups in proteins? A liquid crystal NMR study. J Am Chem Soc 121:4690–4695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ottiger M, Delaglio F, Bax A (1998a) Measurement of J and dipolar couplings from simplified two-dimensional NMR spectra. J Magn Reson 131:373–378ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ottiger M, Delaglio F, Marquardt JL, Tjandra N, Bax A (1998b) Measurement of dipolar couplings for methylene and methyl sites in weakly oriented macromolecules and their use in structure determination. J Magn Reson 134:365–369ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raman S et al (2010) NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science 327:1014–1018ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenzweig R, Kay LE (2014) Bringing dynamic molecular machines into focus by methyl-TROSY NMR. Annu Rev Biochem 83:291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rückert M, Otting G (2000) Alignment of biological macromolecules in novel nonionic liquid crystalline media for NMR experiments. J Am Chem Soc 122:7793–7797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwieters CD, Bermejo GA, Clore GM (2018) Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources. Protein Sci 27:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sgourakis NG et al (2014) The structure of mouse cytomegalovirus M04 protein obtained from sparse NMR data reveals a conserved fold of the M02–M06 viral immune modulator family. Structure 22:1263–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen Y et al (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4685–4690ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sprangers R, Kay LE (2007) Probing supramolecular structure from measurement of methyl 1H–13C residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 129:12668–12669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang C, Iwahara J, Clore GM (2005) Accurate determination of leucine and valine sidechain conformations using U-[15N/13C/2H]/[1H-(methine/methyl)-Leu/Val] isotope labeling, NOE pattern recognition, and methine Cγ–Hγ/Cβ–Hβ residual dipolar couplings: Application to the 34-kDa enzyme IIAchitobiose. J Biomol NMR 33:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tugarinov V, Kay LE (2004) An isotope labeling strategy for methyl TROSY spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 28:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tugarinov V, Kay LE (2005) Methyl groups as probes of structure and dynamics in NMR studies of high-molecular-weight proteins. ChemBioChem 6:1567–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tugarinov V, Kay LE (2013) Estimating sidechain order in [U-2H; 13CH3]-labeled high molecular weight proteins from analysis of HMQC/HSQC spectra. J Phys Chem B 117:3571–3577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tugarinov V, Hwang PM, Ollerenshaw JE, Kay LE (2003) Cross-correlated relaxation enhanced 1H–13C NMR spectroscopy of methyl groups in very high molecular weight proteins and protein complexes. J Am Chem Soc 125:10420–10428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tugarinov V, Karamanos TK, Ceccon A, Clore GM (2020) Optimized NMR experiments for the isolation of I = 1/2 manifold transitions in methyl groups of proteins. ChemPhysChem. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang D, Nagayama K (1996) A sensitivity-enhanced method for measuring heteronuclear long-range coupling constants from the displacement of signals in two 1D subspectra. J Magn Reson Ser A 118:117–121ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply  2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Chemical PhysicsNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations