Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, Volume 73, Issue 6–7, pp 375–384 | Cite as

Identification of conformation-selective nanobodies against the membrane protein insertase BamA by an integrated structural biology approach

  • Hundeep Kaur
  • Jean-Baptiste Hartmann
  • Roman P. Jakob
  • Michael Zahn
  • Iwan Zimmermann
  • Timm Maier
  • Markus A. Seeger
  • Sebastian HillerEmail author
Article

Abstract

The insertase BamA is an essential protein of the bacterial outer membrane. Its 16-stranded transmembrane β-barrel contains a lateral gate as a key functional element. This gate is formed by the C-terminal half of the last β-strand. The BamA barrel was previously found to sample different conformations in aqueous solution, as well as different gate-open, gate-closed, and collapsed conformations in X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy structures. Here, we report the successful identification of conformation-selective nanobodies that stabilize BamA in specific conformations. While the initial candidate generation and selection protocol was based on established alpaca immunization and phage display selection procedures, the final selection of nanobodies was enhanced by a solution NMR-based screening step to shortlist the targets for crystallization. In this way, three crystal structures of BamA–nanobody complexes were efficiently obtained, showing two types of nanobodies that indeed stabilized BamA in two different conformations, i.e., with open and closed lateral gate, respectively. Then, by correlating the structural data with high resolution NMR spectra, we could for the first time assign the BamA conformational solution ensemble to defined structural states. The new nanobodies will be valuable tools towards understanding the client insertion mechanism of BamA and towards developing improved antibiotics.

Keywords

Solution NMR spectroscopy Outer membrane protein X-ray crystallography Protein structure Protein folding Conformational selection Specific binders Nanobodies Lipid gate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Tim Sharpe for scientific support and discussions and sciCORE at University of Basel for support with high performance computing. S. Štefanić from the Nanobody Service Facility of the University of Zurich is acknowledged for alpaca immunizations. X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamline PXI of the Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; we acknowledge excellent support by the facility team. Funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation via the NFP 72 (407240_167125) to S.H., by an SNSF Professorship of the Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P3_144823) to M.A.S. and by a BioEntrepreneur-Fellowship of the University of Zurich (BIOEF-17-002) to I.Z. is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10858_2019_250_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 7153 kb)

References

  1. Adams PD et al (2002) PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58:1948–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht R et al (2014) Structure of BamA, an essential factor in outer membrane protein biogenesis. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 70:1779–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakelar J, Buchanan SK, Noinaj N (2016) The structure of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex. Science 351:180–186ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanpain C et al (2002) Multiple active states and oligomerization of CCR25 revealed by functional properties of monoclonal antibodies. Mol Biol Cell 13:723–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen VB et al (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Geyter J et al (2016) Protein folding in the cell envelope of Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol 1:16107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeLano WL (2002) Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsl Protein Crystallogr 40:82–92Google Scholar
  8. Dmitriev OY, Lutsenko S, Muyldermans S (2016) Nanobodies as probes for protein dynamics in vitro and in cells. J Biol Chem 291:3767–3775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans PR, Murshudov GN (2013) How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69:1204–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia-Nafria J, Lee Y, Bai X, Carpenter B, Tate CG (2018) Cryo-EM structure of the adenosine A2A receptor coupled to an engineered heterotrimeric G protein. Elife 7:e35946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gentle I, Gabriel K, Beech P, Waller R, Lithgow T (2004) The Omp85 family of proteins is essential for outer membrane biogenesis in mitochondria and bacteria. J Cell Biol 164:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu Y et al (2016) Structural basis of outer membrane protein insertion by the BAM complex. Nature 531:64–69ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagan CL, Silhavy TJ, Kahne D (2011) β-Barrel membrane protein assembly by the Bam complex. Annu Rev Biochem 80:189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamers-Casterman C et al (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature 363:446–448ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han L et al (2016) Structure of the BAM complex and its implications for biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartmann JB, Zahn M, Burmann IM, Bibow S, Hiller S (2018) Sequence-specific solution NMR assignments of the β-Barrel Insertase BamA to monitor its conformational ensemble at the atomic level. J Am Chem Soc 140:11252–11260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iadanza MG et al (2016) Lateral opening in the intact β-barrel assembly machinery captured by cryo-EM. Nat Commun 7:12865ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji X et al (2017) Neutralization of TNFalpha in tumor with a novel nanobody potentiates paclitaxel-therapy and inhibits metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 386:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabsch W (2010) Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knowles TJ, Scott-Tucker A, Overduin M, Henderson IR (2009) Membrane protein architects: the role of the BAM complex in outer membrane protein assembly. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krissinel E, Henrick K (2007) Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372:774–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar H et al (2018) Crystal structure of a ligand-bound LacY–nanobody complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:8769–8774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masureel M et al (2018) Structural insights into binding specificity, efficacy and bias of a β2AR partial agonist. Nat Chem Biol 14:1059–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mireku SA, Sauer MM, Glockshuber R, Locher KP (2017) Structural basis of nanobody-mediated blocking of BtuF, the cognate substrate-binding protein of the Escherichia coli vitamin B12 transporter BtuCD. Sci Rep 7:14296ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murshudov GN et al (2011) REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ni D et al (2014) Structural and functional analysis of the β-barrel domain of BamA from Escherichia coli. FASEB J 28:2677–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pardon E et al (2014) A general protocol for the generation of nanobodies for structural biology. Nat Protoc 9:674–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perez C et al (2017) Structural basis of inhibition of lipid-linked oligosaccharide flippase PglK by a conformational nanobody. Sci Rep 7:46641ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinto C et al (2018) Formation of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex in lipid bilayers as seen by solid-state NMR. Nat Commun 9:4135ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasmussen SG et al (2011a) Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor. Nature 469:175–180ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rasmussen SG et al (2011b) Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 477:549–555ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricci DP, Silhavy TJ (2012) The Bam machine: a molecular cooper. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:1067–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ricci DP, Hagan CL, Kahne D, Silhavy TJ (2012) Activation of the Escherichia coli β-barrel assembly machine (Bam) is required for essential components to interact properly with substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:3487–3491ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rigel NW, Schwalm J, Ricci DP, Silhavy TJ (2012) BamE modulates the Escherichia coli β-barrel assembly machine component BamA. J Bacteriol 194:1002–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Storek KM et al (2018) Monoclonal antibody targeting the β-barrel assembly machine of Escherichia coli is bactericidal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:3692–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Terwilliger TC et al (2008) Iterative-build OMIT maps: map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 64:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vagin A, Teplyakov A (2010) Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66:22–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voulhoux R, Bos MP, Geurtsen J, Mols M, Tommassen J (2003) Role of a highly conserved bacterial protein in outer membrane protein assembly. Science 299:262–265ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zavrtanik U, Lukan J, Loris R, Lah J, Hadzi S (2018) Structural basis of epitope recognition by heavy-chain camelid antibodies. J Mol Biol 430:4369–4386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zimmermann I et al (2018) Synthetic single domain antibodies for the conformational trapping of membrane proteins. Elife 7:e34317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of Medical MicrobiologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations