Primary school teachers implementing structured mathematics interventions to promote their mathematics knowledge for teaching proportional reasoning
- 35 Downloads
Proportional reasoning is the ability to use multiplicative thinking and make multiple comparisons. It is known to be challenging for many students and at the same time, many teachers require support to develop sufficient subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge to teach the diverse concepts that underpin proportional reasoning. The data reported in this paper are drawn from the first year of a broader study aiming to promote the teaching and learning of elements of proportional reasoning across the curriculum by engaging primary school teachers in ongoing professional development that includes the implementation of a series of mathematics interventions, each of which included a research component. This paper focuses on the impact of implementing the interventions on the teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Three structured interventions were implemented by eight teachers (Years 3, 4, 5) during each of three school terms. Data collected showed that engaging in this scaffolded type of practitioner research, the structured nature of the interventions, and reflection on the outcomes of each intervention promoted teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge.
KeywordsTeacher professional development Primary school mathematics teacher education Mathematical knowledge for teaching Pedagogical content knowledge
This work was not funded by a grant. It was conducted as part of a university–school collaboration.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.
- Ammon, P., & Kroll, L. R. (2002). Learning and development in constructivist teacher education. In J. Rainer (Ed.), Reframing teacher education: Dimensions of a constructivist approach (pp. 193–240). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
- Aslan-Tutak, F., & Adams, T. L. (2015). A study of geometry content knowledge of elementary preservice teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 310–318.Google Scholar
- Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Ben-Chaim, D., Keret, Y., & Ilany, B.-S. (2007). Designing and implementing authentic investigative proportional reasoning tasks: The impact on pre-service mathematics teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, A., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (Eds.). (2010). Action research in education. Historical perspectives in action research in schools: From curriculum development to enhancing teacher professional learning (Vol. 1). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., & McNamara, O. (2009). Mapping the field of practitioner research, inquiry and professional learning in educational contexts: A review. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education: International perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 10–26). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carrillo, J., Climent, N., Contreras, L. C., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2013). Determining specialized knowledge for mathematics teaching. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.) Proceedings of the VIII congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (CERME 8) (pp. 2985–2994). Antalya, Turkey: Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.Google Scholar
- Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Ellis, N. L. (2012). Teachers’ experiences as practitioner researchers in secondary schools: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://prijipati.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/8609.
- English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Flores, E., Escudero, D. I., & Carrillo, J. (2013). A theoretical review of specialized content knowledge. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.) Proceedings of the VIII congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (CERME 8) (pp. 3055–3064). Antalya, Turkey: Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J. S., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2016). Proportional reasoning: An essential component of scientific understanding. Teaching Science, 62(4), 31–41.Google Scholar
- Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2018). A string number line lesson sequence to promote students’ relative thinking and understanding of scale, key elements of proportional reasoning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 23(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
- Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2015). Using photographic images to enhance conceptual development in situations of proportion. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 20(1), 3–9.Google Scholar
- Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making progress on mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1 & 2), 3–34.Google Scholar
- Hurrell, D. (2013). Effectiveness of teacher professional learning: Enhancing the teaching of fractions in primary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan University, Australia. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/596.
- Kastberg, S. E., D’Ambrosio, B., & Lynch-Davis, K. (2012). Understanding proportional reasoning for teaching. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(3), 32–40.Google Scholar
- Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–668). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93–118). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Lobato, J., Orrill, C. H., Druken, B., & Jacobson, E. (2011). Middle school teachers’ knowledge of proportional reasoning for teaching. In Paper presented in the Symposium Extending, expanding, and applying the construct of mathematical knowledge for teaching, at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. New York: Norton [Original work published 1951].Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Scheerens, J. (Ed.) (2010). Teachers’ professional development: Europe in international comparison. Retrieved from www.bookshop.europa.eu.
- Siebert, D. (2002). Connecting informal thinking and algorithms: The case of division of fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: 2002 yearbook (pp. 247–256). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Smestad, B. (2015). When HPM meets MKT—Exploring the place of history of mathematics in the mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Babin, U. T. Jankvist, & T. H. Kjeldsen (Eds.) History and epistemology in mathematics: Proceedings of the seventh European Summer University ESU7 (pp. 539–549). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
- Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–223). Reston: National Council of Mathematics Teachers.Google Scholar
- Taber, S. B. (2002). Go ask Alice about multiplication of fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: 2002 yearbook (pp. 61–71). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Veal, W. R., & MaKinster J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education 3. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/viewArticle/7615/5382.