Antioxidant-antibacterial containing bi-layer scaffolds as potential candidates for management of oxidative stress and infections in wound healing

  • M. Monsoor Shaik
  • Ashwin Dapkekar
  • Jyutika M. Rajwade
  • Sachin H. Jadhav
  • Meenal KowshikEmail author
Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates Original Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates


Tissue engineering techniques are continuously evolving towards providing better microenvironment along with therapeutic potential to address the skin tissue defects. Factors such as microbial infections, presence of excessive free radicals and depletion in antioxidant based scavenging systems pose serious challenges by prolonging inflammation and delaying the repair process. Incorporation of bioactive molecules in polymer based biomimetic scaffolds may present new vistas for handling chronic wounds. In this study, chitosan/collagen scaffolds incorporating 0.5, 1 and 2% (w/w) silymarin (CS-CO-SM) were synthesized and studied for their biocompatibility, in vitro release kinetics and anti-oxidant activity. The release kinetics of silymarin from the CS-CO-SM scaffold showed an initial burst followed by sustained release. The scaffolds were biocompatible and supported the recovery of COS-7 cells from UV induced oxidative stress. Further the CS-CO-SM(2) scaffolds were used to fabricate a bi-layer scaffold by layer upon layer arrangement with CS-Ag3 (3% Ag, w/w). The Ag was incorporated to impart antimicrobial property to the scaffold. The in vivo studies on bi-layer scaffolds were carried out in Wistar rat models at 3, 7 and 10 days post injury and the skin excisions were studied for wound contraction, histology (H&E staining), and lipid peroxidation. The bi-layer scaffold accelerated the process of wound healing with no inflammatory cells, proliferation of fibroblast, neovascularization and collagen deposition. By day 10 post transplantation of the scaffold, the skin had a structure similar to normal skin with complete re-epithelization. This bi-layer scaffold with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties promotes wound healing and is proposed as a potential tissue engineering material for managing chronic wounds.



The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Joseph RD Fernandes and Dr. Arnab Banerjee for the kind support in immunohistochemical staining. The authors also want to acknowledge the central facility, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus for the help in characterization of the scaffolds, Dr. Chandrashekhar S. Mote for the histological evaluation of skin grafts and Agharkar Research Institute, Pune for the animal studies experiments.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10856_2018_6212_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.6 mb)
Supplementary Information


  1. 1.
    Pellegrini G, Ranno R, Stracuzzi G, Bondanza S, Guerra L, Zambruno G. et al. The control of epidermal stem cells (holoclones) in the treatment of massive full-thickness burns with autologous keratinocytes cultured on fibrin1. Transplantation. 1999;68:868–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim MS, Kim JH, Min BH, Chun HJ, Han DK, Lee HB. Polymeric scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Polym Rev. 2011;51:23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muzzarelli RA, Greco F, Busilacchi A, Sollazzo V, Gigante A. Chitosan, hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89:723–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh D, Singh D, Han SS. 3D printing of scaffold for cells delivery: advances in skin tissue engineering. Polymers. 2016;8:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watt FM, Fujiwara H. Cell-extracellular matrix interactions in normal and diseased skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a005124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knight T, Basu J, Rivera EA, Spencer T, Jain D, Payne R. Fabrication of a multi-layer three-dimensional scaffold with controlled porous micro-architecture for application in small intestine tissue engineering. Cell Adhesion Migration. 2013;7:267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maheshwari SU, Samuel VK, Nagiah N. Fabrication and evaluation of (PVA/HAp/PCL) bilayer composites as potential scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration application. Ceram Int. 2014;40:8469–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohandas A, Nimal T, Das V, Shankarappa SA, Biswas R, Jayakumar R. Drug loaded bi-layered sponge for wound management in hyperfibrinolytic conditions. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:5795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumbhar JV, Jadhav SH, Bodas DS, Barhanpurkar-Naik A, Wani MR, Paknikar KM. et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of a novel bacterial cellulose-based acellular bilayer nanocomposite scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:6437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deng Z, Qian Y, Yu Y, Liu G, Hu J, Zhang G. et al. Engineering intracellular delivery nanocarriers and nanoreactors from oxidation-responsive polymersomes via synchronized bilayer cross-linking and permeabilizing inside live cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:10452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolcott R, Rhoads D, Bennett M, Wolcott B, Gogokhia L, Costerton J. et al. Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm. J Wound Care. 2010;19:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo Sa, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89:219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schreml S, Szeimies R, Prantl L, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bryan N, Ahswin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Wohlert S, Hunt JA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)–a family of fate deciding molecules pivotal in constructive inflammation and wound healing. Eur Cell Mater. 2012;24:e65Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li X, Nan K, Li L, Zhang Z, Chen H. In vivo evaluation of curcumin nanoformulation loaded methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-graft-chitosan composite film for wound healing application. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee Y-H, Chang J-J, Chien C-T, Yang M-C, Chien H-F. Antioxidant sol-gel improves cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:1–11.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tabandeh MR, Oryan A, Mohhammad-Alipour A, Tabatabaei-Naieni A. Silibinin regulates matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysine1) gene expression, hexoseamines and collagen production during rat skin wound healing. Phytother Res. 2013;27:1149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soto C, Pérez J, García V, Uría E, Vadillo M, Raya L. Effect of silymarin on kidneys of rats suffering from alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus. Phytomedicine. 2010;17:1090–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gülçin I. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: an overview. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:345–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guzman M, Dille J, Godet S. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomed: Nanotechnol, Biol Med. 2012;8:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li W-R, Xie X-B, Shi Q-S, Zeng H-Y, You-Sheng O-Y, Chen Y-B. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:1115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naik K, Kowshik M. The silver lining: towards the responsible and limited usage of silver. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;123:1068–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaik MM, Kowshik M. Novel melt-down neutralization method for synthesis of chitosan–silver scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polym Bull. 2016;73:841–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang G, Zhao Y, Feng N, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Dang B. Improved dissolution and bioavailability of silymarin delivered by a solid dispersion prepared using supercritical fluids. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2015;10:194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sionkowska A, Wisniewski M, Skopinska J, Kennedy C, Wess T. Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends. Biomaterials. 2004;25:795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pooja D, Babu Bikkina DJ, Kulhari H, Nikhila N, Chinde S, Raghavendra YM. et al. Fabrication, characterization and bioevaluation of silibinin loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;69:267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han K-S, Song JE, Tripathy N, Kim H, Moon BM, Park CH. et al. Effect of pore sizes of silk scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol Res. 2015;23:1091–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chou S-F, Carson D, Woodrow KA. Current strategies for sustaining drug release from electrospun nanofibers. J Control Release. 2015;220:584–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin C-C, Metters AT. Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:1379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pundir S, Badola A, Sharma D. Sustained release matrix technology and recent advance in matrix drug delivery system: a review. Int J Drug Res Technol. 2017;3:8.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kishen A, Shrestha S, Shrestha A, Cheng C, Goh C. Characterizing the collagen stabilizing effect of crosslinked chitosan nanoparticles against collagenase degradation. Dent Mater. 2016;32:968–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sharma S, Bano S, Ghosh AS, Mandal M, Kim H-W, Dey T. et al. Silk fibroin nanoparticles support in vitro sustained antibiotic release and osteogenesis on titanium surface. Nanomed: Nanotechnol, Biol Med. 2016;12:1193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leena R, Vairamani M, Selvamurugan N. Alginate/Gelatin scaffolds incorporated with Silibinin-loaded Chitosan nanoparticles for bone formation in vitro. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2017;158:308–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee K, Seo C-R, Ku J-M, Lee H, Yoon H, Lee J. et al. 3D-printed alginate/phenamil composite scaffolds constituted with microsized core–shell struts for hard tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 2015;5:29335–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Škottová N, Večeřa R, Urbánek K, Váňa P, Walterová D, Cvak L. Effects of polyphenolic fraction of silymarin on lipoprotein profile in rats fed cholesterol-rich diets. Pharmacol Res. 2003;47:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morgan C, Nigam Y. Naturally derived factors and their role in the promotion of angiogenesis for the healing of chronic wounds. Angiogenesis. 2013;16:493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khanna S, Biswas S, Shang Y, Collard E, Azad A, Kauh C. et al. Macrophage dysfunction impairs resolution of inflammation in the wounds of diabetic mice. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jain J, Arora S, Rajwade JM, Omray P, Khandelwal S, Paknikar KM. Silver nanoparticles in therapeutics: development of an antimicrobial gel formulation for topical use. Mol Pharm. 2009;6:1388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    You C, Li Q, Wang X. et al. Silver nanoparticle loaded collagen/chitosan scaffolds promote wound healing via regulating fibroblast migration and macrophage activation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nencini C, Giorgi G, Micheli L. Protective effect of silymarin on oxidative stress in rat brain. Phytomedicine. 2007;14:129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sherif IO, Al-Gayyar MM. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective effects of silymarin on hepatic dysfunction induced by sodium nitrite. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2013;24:114–21.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nielsen F, Mikkelsen BB, Nielsen JB, Andersen HR, Grandjean P.Plasma malondialdehyde as biomarker for oxidative stress: reference interval and effects of life-style factors. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1209–14.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Feng Z, Hu W, Marnett LJ, Tang M-s. Malondialdehyde, a major endogenous lipid peroxidation product, sensitizes human cells to UV-and BPDE-induced killing and mutagenesis through inhibition of nucleotide excision repair. Mutat Res/Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 2006;601:125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesBirla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, K K Birla Goa CampusGoaIndia
  2. 2.Nanobioscience groupAgharkar Research InstitutePuneIndia
  3. 3.Animal Sciences DivisionAgharkar Research InstitutePuneIndia

Personalised recommendations