Advertisement

Plasma processing of PDMS based spinal implants for covalent protein immobilization, cell attachment and spreading

  • Daniel V. Bax
  • Yongbai Yin
  • Alexey Kondyurin
  • Ashish D. Diwan
  • Divya Bhargav
  • Anthony S. Weiss
  • Marcela M. M. Bilek
  • David R. McKenzie
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization

Abstract

PDMS is widely used for prosthetic device manufacture. Conventional ion implantation is not a suitable treatment to enhance the biocompatibility of poly dimethyl siloxane (PDMS) due to its propensity to generate a brittle silicon oxide surface layer which cracks and delaminates. To overcome this limitation, we have developed new plasma based processes to balance the etching of carbon with implantation of carbon from the plasma source. When this carbon was implanted from the plasma phase it resulted in a surface that was structurally similar and intermixed with the underlying PDMS material and not susceptible to delamination. The enrichment in surface carbon allowed the formation of carbon based radicals that are not present in conventional plasma ion immersion implantation (PIII) treated PDMS. This imparts the PDMS surfaces with covalent protein binding capacity that is not observed on PIII treated PDMS. The change in surface energy preserved the function of bound biomolecules and enhanced the attachment of MG63 osteosarcoma cells compared to the native surface. The attached cells, an osteoblast interaction model, showed increased spreading on the treated over untreated surfaces. The carbon-dependency for these beneficial covalent protein and cell linkage properties was tested by incorporating carbon from a different source. To this end, a second surface was produced where carbon etching was balanced against implantation from a thin carbon-based polymer coating. This had similar protein and cell-binding properties to the surfaces generated with carbon inclusion in the plasma phase, thus highlighting the importance of balancing carbon etching and deposition. Additionally, the two effects of protein linkage and bioactivity could be combined where the cell response was further enhanced by covalently tethering a biomolecule coating, as exemplified here with the cell adhesive protein tropoelastin. Providing a balanced carbon source in the plasma phase is applicable to prosthetic device fabrication as illustrated using a 3-dimensional PDMS balloon prosthesis for spinal implant applications. Consequently, this study lays the groundwork for effective treatments of PDMS to selectively recruit cells to implantable PDMS fabricated biodevices.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for the project was obtained from the Australian Research Council and Spinecell Pty Ltd D. V. Bax is funded by the Peoples Programme of the EU 7th Framework Programme (RAE no: PIIF-GA-2013-624904). A. Kondyurin is partially funded by the Ministry of Education of Perm Region.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

A.S.Weiss is the Scientific Founder of Elastagen Pty Ltd. A. D. Diwan discloses 1) Consultant to Nuvasive Inc San Diego (CA) 2) Nuvasive Inc provides an unrestricted donation to my institution (The UNSW) for fellows training 3) Named inventor and part owner of patents for disc repair and regeneration.

Supplementary material

10856_2018_6181_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.8 mb)
Supplementary information

References

  1. 1.
    Meacham KW, Giuly RJ, Guo L, Hochman S, DeWeerth SP. A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord. Biomed Micro. 2008;10:259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diwan AD United Stated patent number US 2011/0153021 A1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strange DG, Fisher ST, Boughton PC, Kishen TJ, Diwan AD. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study. Spine J. 2010;10:602–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hillborg H, Gedde UW. Hydrophobicity changes in silicone rubbers. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul. 1999;6:703–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binfield TL, Colton E, Anderson JM. Fibroblast simulation by monocytes cultured in protein adsorbed biomedical polymers. I J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tang LP, Eaton JW. Fibrinogen mediates acute inflammatory responses to biomaterials. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2001;5:185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen H, Yuan L, Song W, Wu ZK, Li D. Biocompatible polymer materials: role of protein-surface interactions. Prog Polym, Sci. 2008;33:1059–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirsh SL, McKenzie DR, Nosworthy NJ, Denman JA, Sezerman OU, Bilek MMM. The Vroman effect: competitive protein exchange with dynamic multilayer protein aggregates. Colloids Surf, B. 2013;103:395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Risio S, Yan N. Adsorption and inactivation behavior of horseradish peroxidase on various substrates. Colloids Surf, B. 2010;79:397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Llobera A, Wilke R, Büttgenbach S. Enhancement of the response of poly(dimethylsiloxane) hollow prisms through air mirrors for absorbance-based sensing. Talanta. 2008;75:473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yasukawa T, Maekawa E, Mizutani F. Immobilization of glucose oxidase on a poly(dimethylsiloxane layer by using poly(L-lysine) as a polymer backbone. Anal Sci. 2009;25:1159–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wong I, Ho CM. Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2009;7:291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Makamba H, Kim JH, Lim K, Park N, Hahn JH. Surface modification of poly(dimethyl siloxane) microchannels. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:3607–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pruden KG, Beaudoin SP. Downstream microwave ammonia plasma treatment of polydimethylsiloxane. J Vac Sci Technol A. 2005;23:208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hillborg H, Gedde UW. Hydrophobicity recovery of polydimethylsiloxane after exposure to corona discharges. Polymer. 1998;39:1991–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bax DV, McKenzie DR, Weiss AS, Bilek MMM. The linker-free covalent attachment of collagen to plasma immersion ion implantation treated polytetrafluoroethylene and subsequent cell-binding activity. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2526–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bilek MM, Bax DV, Kondyurin A, Yin Y, Nosworthy NJ, Fisher K, Waterhouse A, Weiss AS, dos Remedios CG, McKenzie DR. Free radical functionalization of surfaces to prevent adverse responses to biomedical devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bax DV, Kondyurin A, Waterhouse A, McKenzie DR, Weiss AS, Bilek MM. Surface plasma modification and tropoelastin coating of a polyurethane co-polymer for enhanced cell attachment and reduced thrombogenicity. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nosworthy NJ, McKenzie DR, Bilek MM. A new Surface for immobilizing and maintaining the function of enzymes in a freeze-dried state. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:2577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Awaja F, Bax DV, Zhang S, James N, McKenzie DR. Cell adhesion to PEEK treated by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition for active medical implants. Plasma Process Polym. 2012;9:355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bax DV, Wang Y, Li Z, Maitz PK, McKenzie DR, Bilek MM, Weiss AS. Binding of the cell adhesive protein tropoelastin to PTFE through plasma immersion ion implantation treatment. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yeo GC, Kondyurin A, Kosobrodova E, Weiss AS, Bilek MM. A sterilizable, biocompatible, tropoelastin surface coating immobilized by energetic ion activation. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14:20160837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hajian H, Wise SG, Bax DV, Kondyurin A, Waterhouse A, Dunn LL, Kielty CM, Yu Y, Weiss AS, Bilek MM, Bannon PG, Ng MK. Immobilisation of a fibrillin-1 fragment enhances the biocompatibility of PTFE. Colloids Surf, B. 2014;116:544–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bax DV, McKenzie DR, Bilek MM, Weiss AS. Directed cell attachment by tropoelastin on masked plasma immersion ion implantation treated PTFE. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6710–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodgers UR, Weiss AS. Integrin alpha v beta 3 binds a unique non-RGD site near the C-terminus of human tropoelastin. Biochimie. 2004;86:173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gioia G, Ortiz M. Delamination of Compressed Thin Films. Adv Appl Mech. 1997;33:120–92.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR. Plasma modified surfaces for covalent immobilization of functional biomolecules in the absence of chemical linkers: towards better biosensors and a new generation of medical implants. Biophys Rev. 2010;2:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee P, Bax DV, Bilek MMM, Weiss AS. A novel cell adhesion region in tropoelastin mediates attachment to integrin αVβ5. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:1467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee P, Yeo GC, Weiss AS. A cell adhesive peptide from tropoelastin promotes sequential cell attachment and spreading via distinct receptors. FEBS J. 2017;284:2216–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu Y, Wise SG, Michael PL, Bax DV, Yuen GS, Hiob MA, Yeo GC, Filipe EC, Dunn LL, Chan KH, Hajian H, Celermajer DS, Weiss AS, Ng MK. Characterization of endothelial progenitor cell interactions with human tropoelastin. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Broekelmann TJ, Kozel BA, Ishibashi H, Werneck CC, Keeley FW, Zhang L, Mecham RP. Tropoelastin interacts with cell-surface glycosaminoglycans via its COOH-terminal domain. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40939–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and MetallurgyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Spine Service, St George and Sutherland Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Charles Perkins CentreUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  6. 6.Bosch InstituteUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations