Property comparison of flexible Cu(InGa)Se2 thin film solar cells on Ti and Ni foils without diffusion barrier
- 25 Downloads
Flexible Cu(InGa)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells on metallic substrates are highly desirable for versatile energy applications. However, related researches reported on CIGS devices usually used a diffusion barrier, which involves an issue of thermal expansion coefficient matching and complicates the fabrication process. In this study, CIGS solar cells were fabricated on Ni and Ti foils through selenization of metal stacks deposited by e-beam evaporation, without the use of diffusion barrier. The films on Ti foils showed (112) preferred orientation while those on Ni foils exhibited (220) preferred orientation, due to the different crystal orientation of substrates. In–Ni and Ga–Ni phase were observed in films prepared on Ni foils, which led to the existence of Cu2–xSe. As a result, the CIGS solar cells fabricated on Ni foils showed inferior photoelectric properties, whereas those on 50 and 100 μm Ti foils presented conversion efficiency of 4.9% and 6.6%. The discrepancy on efficiency between two cells on Ti foils was ascribed to the different structural properties induced by the thermal stress. After 100 bending cycles, efficiency of cells on 50 and 100 μm thick Ti foils decreased by 1.0% and 2.6% respectively, indicating that CIGS solar cell on 50 μm Ti foil is more promising as flexible device applied on harsh circumstance.
This work has been financially supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61774084), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3082017NP2017106), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, by the research fund of Jiangsu Province Cultivation base for State Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Science and Technology (Grant No. SKLPSTKF201506), and by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYCX17_0258).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.M. Stanley, M. Jubault, F. Donsanti, N. Naghavi, Phys. Status Solidi C 14, 1700174 (2017)Google Scholar
- 20.K.H.J. Buschow, R.W. Cahn, M.C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E.J. Kramer, S. Mahajan, Encyclopedia of materials. Sci. Technol. 1, 11 (2001)Google Scholar