Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 2202–2214 | Cite as

Effect of restraint stress on martensite transformation in low transformation temperature weld metal

  • Zhijin Zhou
  • Xinjie Di
  • Chengning LiEmail author
  • Shipin Wu
Metals & corrosion


In this study, martensite transformation behavior of low transformation temperature (LTT) weld metals under unrestrained and restrained conditions was analyzed by thermal simulation technology. It is found that martensite transformation start (Ms) temperature and martensite transformation temperature range of LTT weld metal under restrained condition increased by 85 K and 50 K, respectively, compared with that of under unrestrained condition, which is attributed to the significant increase Gibbs free energy produced by restraint stress for martensite transformation. The increasement of Ms due to the effect of restraint stress is quantitatively described by Fe–X–C ternary regular solution-elastic energy model. Based on the transformation kinetics curve, the effect of restraint stress on martensite transformation of LTT weld metal can be divided into three stages, including stress-induced nucleation, transition and without effect stages. In initial stage, the martensite nucleates at a relatively high temperature with a low phase transformation rate due to the directional effect of restraint stress; in second stage with martensite transformation fraction range of 0.2–0.6, the elastic energy caused by restraint stress decreases significantly, and the chemical free energy of martensite transformation under restrained condition is lower than that under unrestrained condition, which results in the martensitic transformation rate of LTT weld metal under restraint condition being lower than that under unrestrained condition; in final stage, the small value of restraint stress has little effect on martensite transformation of LTT weld metal, and the transformation rate of martensite mainly depends on the content of austenite. This study provides a theoretical base for better understanding phase transformation and microstructure of LTT weld metal under restrained condition.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51774213) and the Regional Demonstration Project of Marine Economic Innovation and Development (Grant No. BHSF2017-10).


  1. 1.
    Liu Y, Shi L, Liu C, Yu L, Yan Z, Li H (2016) Effect of step quenching on microstructures and mechanical properties of HSLA steel. Mater Sci Eng A 675:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramesh R, Dinaharan I, Kumar R, Akinlabi E (2017) Microstructure and mechanical characterization of friction stir welded high strength low alloy steels. Mater Sci Eng A 687:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gadallah R, Tsutsumi S, Hiraoka K, Murakawa H (2015) Prediction of residual stresses induced by low transformation temperature weld wires and its validation using the contour method. Mar Struct 44:232–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferro P, Berto F, James N (2017) Asymptotic residual stress distribution induced by multipass welding processes. Int J Fatigue 101:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen X, Wang P, Pan Q, Lin S (2018) The effect of martensitic phase transformation dilation on microstructure, strain–stress and mechanical properties for welding of high-strength steel. Crystals 8(7):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu S, Wang D, Di X, Zhang Z, Feng Z, Liu X, Li Y, Meng X (2018) Toughening mechanisms of low transformation temperature deposited metals with martensite–austenite dual phases. J Mater Sci 53(5):3720–3734. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohta A (1999) Fatigue strength improvement by using newly developed low transformation temperature welding material. Weld World 43(6):38–42Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramjaun T, Stone H, Karlsson L, Kelleher J, Moat R, Kornmeier JR, Dalaei K, Bhadeshia H (2014) Effect of interpass temperature on residual stresses in multipass welds produced using low transformation temperature filler alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 19(1):44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harati E, Karlsson L, Svensson L-E, Dalaei K (2017) Applicability of low transformation temperature welding consumables to increase fatigue strength of welded high strength steels. Int J Fatigue 97:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deng D, Liu X, He J, Liang W (2016) Investigating the influence of external restraint on welding distortion in thin-plate bead-on joint by means of numerical simulation and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(5–8):1049–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leggatt RH (2008) Residual stresses in welded structures. Int J Press Vessels Pip 85(3):144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixneit J, Kromm A, Hannemann A, Friedersdorf P, Kannengießer T, Gibmeier J (2016) In-situ load analysis in multi-run welding using LTT filler materials. Weld World 60(6):1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramjaun T, Stone H, Karlsson L, Kelleher J, Ooi S, Dalaei K, Rebelo Kornmeier J, Bhadeshia H (2014) Effects of dilution and baseplate strength on stress distributions in multipass welds deposited using low transformation temperature filler alloys. Sci Technol Weld Join 19(6):461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ooi S, Garnham J, Ramjaun T (2014) Low transformation temperature weld filler for tensile residual stress reduction. Mater Des 1980–2015(56):773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thadhani N, Meyers M (1986) Kinetics of martensitic transformation induced by a tensile stress pulse. Acta Metall 34(8):1625–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang S-N, AndréMeyers M (1988) Martensitic transformation induced by a tensile stress pulse in Fe-22.5 wt% Ni-4 wt% Mn alloy. Acta Metall 36(4):1085–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McReynolds AW (1949) Effects of stress and deformation on the martensite transformation. J Appl Phys 20(10):896–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fiedler H (1955) The effect of deformation on the martensitic transformation in austenitic stainless steels. Trans Am Soc Met 47:267–290Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wollmann D, Guimarães J (1973) The effects of plastic deformation and thermal stabilization of austenite upon martensite burst kinetics. Scripta Metall 7(4):355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nedjad SH, Gharabagh M-RM (2008) Dislocation structure and crystallite size distribution in lath martensite determined by X-ray diffraction peak profile analysis. Int J Mater Res 99(11):1248–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takebayashi S, Kunieda T, Yoshinaga N, Ushioda K, Ogata S (2010) Comparison of the dislocation density in martensitic steels evaluated by some X-ray diffraction methods. ISIJ Int 50(6):875–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ungár T, Borbély A (1996) The effect of dislocation contrast on X-ray line broadening: a new approach to line profile analysis. Appl Phys Lett 69(21):3173–3175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feng ZY, Di XJ, Wu SP, Zhang Z, Liu XQ, Wang DP (2017) Comparison of two types of low-transformation-temperature weld metals based on solidification mode. Sci Technol Weld Join 23(3):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhadeshia H (2004) Developments in martensitic and bainitic steels: role of the shape deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 378(1–2):34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu Y, Sommer F, Mittemeijer E (2004) Kinetics of the abnormal austenite–ferrite transformation behaviour in substitutional Fe-based alloys. Acta Mater 52(9):2549–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohapatra G, Sommer F, Mittemeijer E (2007) The austenite to ferrite transformation of Fe–Ni under the influence of a uniaxially applied tensile stress. Acta Mater 55(13):4359–4368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rao BVN, Thomas G (1980) Structure-property relations and the design of Fe–4Cr–C base structural steels for high strength and toughness. Metall Trans A 11(3):441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dutta RK, Amirthalingam M, Hermans MJM, Richardson IM (2013) Kinetics of bainitic transformation and transformation plasticity in a high strength quenched and tempered structural steel. Mater Sci Eng A 559:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krauss G (1999) Martensite in steel: strength and structure. Mater Sci Eng A 273:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ea W (1994) The γ → α transformation in low carbon irons. ISIJ Int 34(8):615–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sahu P, Hamada A, Ghosh Chowdhury S, Karjalainen L (2007) Structure and microstructure evolution during martensitic transformation in wrought Fe–26 Mn–0.14 C austenitic steel: an effect of cooling rate. J Appl Crystallogr 40(2):354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malik A, Amberg G, Borgenstam A, Ågren J (2013) Effect of external loading on the martensitic transformation—a phase field study. Acta Mater 61(20):7868–7880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hsu T (1985) An approximate approach for the calculation of M s in iron-base alloys. J Mater Sci 20(1):23–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hsu T, Hongbing C, Shoufu L (1983) On thermodynamic calculation of M s and on driving force for martensitic transformations in Fe–C. J Mater Sci 18(11):3206–3212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Swartz J (1969) The solubility of graphite and cementite in-alpha, delta-aron. Trans Met Soc AIME 245(5):1083–1092Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wada T, Wada H, Elliott J, Chipman J (1972) Activity of carbon and solubility of carbides in the FCC Fe–Mo–C, Fe–Cr–C, and Fe–VC alloys. Metal Mater Trans B 3(11):2865–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaufman L (1959) The free-energy changes attending the martensitic transformation in the iron-chromium and iron-chromium-nickel systems. Trans Met Soc AIME 215:218–227Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Patel J, Cohen M (1953) Criterion for the action of applied stress in the martensitic transformation. Acta Metall 1(5):531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chang Y, Li X, Zhao K, Wang C, Zheng G, Hu P, Dong H (2015) Influence of stress on martensitic transformation and mechanical properties of hot stamped AHSS parts. Mater Sci Eng A 629:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu Y, Liu C, Sommer F, Mittemeijer EJ (2015) Martensite formation kinetics of substitutional Fe–0.7at.%Al alloy under uniaxial compressive stress. Acta Mater 98(6–7):164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Joining TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations