Advertisement

Ultra-long ZnO/carbon nanofiber as free-standing electrochemical sensor for dopamine in the presence of uric acid

  • Chi YangEmail author
  • Chunyan Zhang
  • Tong Huang
  • Xiuxiu Dong
  • Langqin Hua
Materials for life sciences
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA) have similar peak potentials in vivo, and it is difficult to distinguish them by general electrode material. Here, we used a magnetron sputtering method to sputter the ZnO seed layer on carbon fiber and prepare ultra-long ZnO nanofibers/carbon fibers (ZnO NF/CF) electrode by in situ hydrothermal method. As a free-standing electrode, not only electrochemical detection of DA and UA but also a separation of oxidation potential peaks of DA and UA can be achieved. In addition, in the case of high concentration UA (0.1 mM), ZnO NF/CF shows high sensitivity and selectivity and shows a wide linear range for DA (4–20 µM). Meanwhile, we proposed the electrochemical mechanism and process of DA and UA on the surface of ZnO, which helps us to understand the simultaneous detection of DA and UA by such electrochemical electrodes.

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91644103, 41603104, 61404075), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0212302), the Postdoctoral Foundation of Jiangsu Province (1601090B), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M601694), and the Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20150895). Also including the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (PCSIRT) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD). At the same time, we also thank Professor Yanlin Zhang for his support and discussion.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors have declared that: (1) no support, financial or otherwise, has been received from any organization that may have an interest in the submitted work, and (2) there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_4000_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1412 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348):56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K, Dai H (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287(5453):622–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang C, Gu B, Zhang D, Ge C, Tao H (2016) Coaxial carbon fiber/ZnO nanorods as electrodes for the electrochemical determination of dopamine. Anal Methods 8(3):650–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmad M, Pan C, Luo Z, Jing Z (2010) A single ZnO nanofiber-based highly sensitive amperometric glucose biosensor. J Phys Chem 114(20):9308–9313Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katoch A, Sun GJ, Choi SW, Byun JH, Sang SK (2013) Competitive influence of grain size and crystallinity on gas sensing performances of ZnO nanofibers. Sens Actuators B Chem 185(8):411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang Z, Li X, Wang C, Wei L, Liu Y, Shao C (2009) ZnO hollow nanofibers: fabrication from facile single capillary electrospinning and applications in gas sensors. J Phys Chem C 113(45):19397–19403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin D, Hui W, Rui Z, Wei P (2009) Enhanced photocatalysis of electrospun Ag–ZnO heterostructured nanofibers. Chem Mater 21(15):3479–3484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gu B, Zhong L, Wang X, Dong X (2016) RF magnetron sputtering synthesis of carbon fibers/ZnO coaxial nanocable microelectrode for electrochemical sensing of ascorbic acid. Mater Lett 181:265–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang S, Xia L, Yu L, Zhang L, Wang H, Lou XW (2016) Free-standing nitrogen-doped carbon nanofiber films: integrated electrodes for sodium-ion batteries with ultralong cycle life and superior rate capability. Adv Energy Mater 6(7):1502217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen C, Li D, Hu Q, Wang R (2014) Properties of polymethyl methacrylate-based nanocomposites: reinforced with ultra-long chitin nanofiber extracted from crab shells. Mater Des 56:1049–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jie F, Dan L, Huang J, Chao Z, Xiao D, Zhang L (2018) Growth of aligned ZnO nanorods on carbon fabric and its composite for superior mechanical and tribological performance. Surf Coat Technol 344:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, Han D, Yang RQ, Ji YC, Liu J, Yu L (2019) Electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization based on three-dimensional ZnO nanowires/graphite hybrid microfiber structure. Bioelectrochemistry 128:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith SK, Gosrani SP, Lee CA, McCarty GS, Sombers LA (2018) Carbon-fiber microbiosensor for monitoring rapid lactate fluctuations in brain tissue using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Anal Chem 90(21):12994–12999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang J, Han D, Wang S, Zhang XD, Yang RQ, Ji YC, Yu X (2019) Electrochemical detection of adenine and guanine using a three-dimensional WS2 nanosheet/graphite microfiber hybrid electrode. Electrochem Commun 99:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun YL, Lin YL, Han R, Wang XY, Luo CN (2019) A chemiluminescence biosensor for lysozyme detection based on aptamers and hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme modified sandwich-rod carbon fiber composite. Talanta 200:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu H, Gu C, Hou C, Yin Z, Fan K, Zhang M (2016) Plasma-assisted synthesis of carbon fibers/ZnO core–shell hybrids on carbon fiber templates for detection of ascorbic acid and uric acid. Sens Actuators B Chem 224:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun C-L, Chang C-T, Lee H-H, Zhou J, Wang J, Sham T-K, Pong W-F (2011) Microwave-assisted synthesis of a core–shell MWCNT/GONR heterostructure for the electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. ACS Nano 5(10):7788–7795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lavoie MJ, Ostaszewski BA, Schlossmacher MG, Selkoe DJ (2005) Dopamine covalently modifies and functionally inactivates parkin. Nat Med 11(11):1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghoreishi SM, Behpour M, Fard MHM (2012) Electrochemical methods for simultaneous determination of trace amounts of dopamine and uric acid using a carbon paste electrode incorporated with multi-wall carbon nanotubes and modified with α-cyclodextrine. J Solid State Electrochem 16(1):179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jian T, Zhang L, Yun L, Jie Z, Han G, Tang W (2015) Gold nanoparticles-β-cyclodextrin-chitosan-graphene modified glassy carbon electrode for ultrasensitive detection of dopamine and uric acid. Electroanalysis 26(9):2057–2064Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vinoth V, Wu JJ, Anandan S (2016) Sensitive electrochemical determination of dopamine and uric acid using AuNPs(EDAS)–rGO nanocomposites. Anal Methods 8(22):4379–4390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jie C, Han X, Sun H, Shao S, Weng L, Wang L (2016) Platinum nanoparticles supported MoS2 nanosheet for simultaneous detection of dopamine and uric acid. Sci China Chem 59(3):332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang L, Pei S, Jin G, Wu W, Xu S, Li J, Kang Z, Deng A (2015) A novel sensor based on electrodeposited Au–Pt bimetallic nano-clusters decorated on graphene oxide (GO)–electrochemically reduced GO for sensitive detection of dopamine and uric acid. Sens Actuators B Chem 221:1542–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang J, Yang B, Zhong J, Yan B, Zhang K, Zhai C, Shiraishi Y, Du Y, Yang P (2017) Dopamine and uric acid electrochemical sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with cubic Pd and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. J Colloid Interface Sci 497:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan AF, Brownson DAC, Randviir EP, Smith GC, Banks CE (2016) 2D hexagonal boron nitride (2D-HBN) explored for the electrochemical sensing of dopamine. Anal Chem 88(19):9729–9737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan MMI, Baek GW, Kim K, Kwon HI, Jin SH (2017) Simultaneous detection of dopamine and uric acid on indium tin oxides modified with cost-effective gas-phase synthesized single walled carbon nanotubes. Electroanalysis 29(8):1925–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang D, Huang B, Liu J, Guo X, Abudukeyoumu G, Zhang Y, Ye B-C, Li Y (2018) A novel electrochemical sensor based on Cu@ Ni/MWCNTs nanocomposite for simultaneous determination of guanine and adenine. Biosens Bioelectron 102:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baig N, Kawde AN, Ibrahim M (2019) A new approach of controlled single step in situ fabrication of graphene composite sensor for simultaneous sensing of small biomolecules in human urine. ChemistrySelect 4(5):1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alipour E, Majidi MR, Saadatirad A, Mahdi Golabi S, Alizadeh AM (2013) Simultaneous determination of dopamine and uric acid in biological samples on the pretreated pencil graphite electrode. Electrochim Acta 91:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tatsuma T, Watanabe T (1991) Oxidase/peroxidase bilayer-modified electrodes as sensors for lactate, pyruvate, cholesterol and uric acid. Anal Chim Acta 242:85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guan Y, Wu T, Ye J (2005) Determination of uric acid and p-aminohippuric acid in human saliva and urine using capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection: Potential application in fast diagnosis of renal disease. J Chromatogr B 821(2):229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ross MA (1994) Determination of ascorbic acid and uric acid in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 657(1):197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dutt JSN, Cardosi MF, Livingstone C, Davis J (2005) Diagnostic implications of uric acid in electroanalytical measurements. Electroanal Int J Devoted Fundam Pract Asp Electroanal 17(14):1233–1243Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hermanson KD, Lumsdon SO, Williams JP, Kaler EW, Velev OD (2001) Dielectrophoretic assembly of electrically functional microwires from nanoparticle suspensions. Science 294(5544):1082–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), School of Applied MeteorologyNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations