Advertisement

From agaric hydrogel to nitrogen-doped 3D porous carbon for high-performance Li–S batteries

  • Xingxing GuEmail author
  • Hui Li
  • Hongyu Wen
  • Yanjun Zhou
  • Han Kang
  • Hu Liao
  • Maohua Gao
  • Yueqin Wang
  • Lan Deng
  • Xinxin Yi
  • Xiaoteng LiuEmail author
Energy materials
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Reproducible massive biochar with low cost has attracted great attentions due to their potential applications in the future environment and energy. In this work, a nitrogen-doped 3D porous agaric carbon (N-AC) with high specific surface area (1568.2 m2 g−1) was fabricated without adding any activator by using the agaric hydrogel as a precursor. And when employed as a sulfur host, the resulted N-AC–sulfur composite electrode with 60 wt% sulfur content illustrates a high reversible capacity of 875 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C (1 C = 1675 mA g−1) over 100 cycles as well as an excellent rate capability of 620 mAh g−1 at 2 C. Such excellent electrochemical performances could attribute to (1) the conductive carbon skeleton of N-AC that provides rapid electron/ion transfer; (2) abundant pores range from micropores to macropores in N-AC that are beneficial to accommodating the active sulfur and polysulfides and (3) the nitrogen dopants that provide polarized sites in chemical binding of polysulfides. In a word, this work provides a compelling avenue to the design of multifunctional sulfur host for advanced Li–S batteries.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51902036, 51808080), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Science & Technology Commission (No. cstc2019jcyj-msxm1407), the Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees (Grant No. CX2018129), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJQN201800808), the Start-up Foundation of High-level Talents in Chongqing Technology and Business University (Grant No.1856008) and Open Research Fund of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and New Environmental Materials (Grant No. KFJJ2018082). Dr. Liu also wanted to thank the financial support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (Grant No. EP/S032886/1).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3999_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2314 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2011) Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Younesi R, Veith GM, Johansson P, Edström K, Vegge T (2015) Lithium salts for advanced lithium batteries: Li–metal, Li–O2, and Li–S. Energy Environ Sci 8:1905–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai H, Xi K, Liu X, Lai C, Zhang S (2018) Cationic surfactant-based electrolyte additives for uniform lithium deposition via lithiophobic repulsion mechanisms. J Am Chem Soc 140:17515–17521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li C, Li J, Zhang Y, Cui X, Lei H, Li G (2019) Heteroatom-doped hierarchically porous carbons derived from cucumber stem as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Sci 54:5641–5657.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03229-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gu X, Lai C (2019) One dimensional nanostructures contribute better Li–S and Li–Se batteries: progress, challenges and perspectives. Energy Storage Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.013 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu X, Tang T, Liu X, Hou Y (2019) Rechargeable metal batteries based on selenium cathodes: progress, challenges and perspectives. J Mater Chem A 7:11566–11583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Y, Zheng G, Cui Y (2013) Nanostructured sulfur cathodes. Chem Soc Rev 42:3018–3032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walle MD, Zhang Z, Zhang M, You X, Li Y, Liu YN (2018) Hierarchical 3D nitrogen and phosphorous codoped graphene/carbon nanotubes–sulfur composite with synergistic effect for high performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci 53:2685–2696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1678-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duan L, Zhao L, Cong H, Zhang X, Lu W, Xue C (2019) Plasma treatment for nitrogen-doped 3D graphene framework by a conductive matrix with sulfur for high-performance Li–S batteries. Small 15:1804347–1804354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liang S, Liang C, Xia Y et al (2016) Facile synthesis of porous Li2S@C composites as cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 306:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng XB, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, Peng HJ, Zhao MQ, Wei F (2014) Aligned carbon nanotube/sulfur composite cathodes with high sulfur content for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 4:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang C, Wu HB, Yuan C, Guo Z, Lou XWD (2012) Confining sulfur in double-shelled hollow carbon spheres for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 124:9730–9733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou G, Li L, Ma C et al (2015) A graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li–S batteries. Nano Energy 11:356–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang J, Cai Y, Zhong Q, Lai D, Yao J (2015) Porous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from silk fibroin protein encapsulating sulfur as a superior cathode material for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 7:17791–17797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song RS, Wang B, Ruan TT et al (2018) A three-dimensional cathode matrix with bi-confinement effect of polysulfide for lithium–sulfur battery. Appl Surf Sci 472:396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gu X, Xin L, Li Y, Dong F, Fu M, Hou Y (2018) Highly reversible Li–Se batteries with ultra-lightweight N, S-codoped graphene blocking layer. Nano-Micro Lett 10:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gu X, Wang Y, Lai C et al (2015) Microporous bamboo biochar for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Res 8:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang K, Gao Q, Tan Y et al (2016) Biomass-derived porous carbon with micropores and small mesopores for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J 22:3239–3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Konarov A, Li Z, Chen P (2015) Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. J Alloys Compd 619:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao S, Li C, Wang W et al (2013) A novel porous nanocomposite of sulfur/carbon obtained from fish scales for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:3334–3339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yao H, Zheng G, Li W et al (2013) Crab shells as sustainable templates from nature for nanostructured battery electrodes. Nano Lett 13:3385–3390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei S, Zhang H, Huang Y, Wang W, Xia Y, Yu Z (2011) Pig bone derived hierarchical porous carbon and its enhanced cycling performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:736–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuan H, Liu T, Liu Y et al (2019) A review of biomass materials for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Sci 10:7484–7495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gu X, Lai C, Liu F, Yang W, Hou Y, Zhang S (2015) A conductive interwoven bamboo carbon fiber membrane for Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:9502–9509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao Q, Zhu Q, An Y et al (2018) A 3D conductive carbon interlayer with ultrahigh adsorption capability for lithium-suflur batteries. Appl Surf Sci 440:770–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li D, Chang G, Zong L et al (2019) From double-helix structured seaweed to S-doped carbon aerogel with ultra-high surface area for energy storage. Energy Storage Mater 17:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu Z, Liu Y, Ju Z et al (2019) Synthesis of diverse green carbon nanomaterials through fully utilizing biomass carbon source assisted by KOH. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:24205–24211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ma J, Qiao Z, Xiang X (2011) Optimisation of extraction procedure for black fungus polysaccharides and effect of the polysaccharides on blood lipid and myocardium antioxidant enzymes activities. Carbohydr Polym 84:1061–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu X, Xu Y, Li D, Zhao N, Gong J (2018) Correlation of the antioxidant activity and of polysaccharides from auricularia auricula with its molecular weight and extracting agent properties. Mod Food Sci Technol 34:59–67Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gu X, Tong CJ, Rehman S, Liu LM, Hou Y, Zhang S (2016) Multifunctional nitrogen-doped loofah sponge carbon blocking layer for high-performance rechargeable lithium batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:15991–16001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gu X, Tong CJ, Lai C et al (2015) Porous nitrogen and phosphorous dual doped graphene blocking layer for high performance Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:16670–16678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lai C, Wu Z, Gu X et al (2015) Reinforced conductive confinement of sulfur for robust and high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:23885–23892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liang C, Liang S, Xia Y et al (2017) H2O-induced self-propagating synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon: a promising lithium storage material with superior rate capability and ultra-long cycling life. J Mater Chem A 5:18221–18229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liang C, Liang S, Xia Y et al (2018) Synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon from metal carbonates towards high-performance lithium storage. Green Chem 20:1484–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hencz L, Gu X, Zhou X, Martens W, Zhang S (2017) Highly porous nitrogen-doped seaweed carbon for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci 52:12336–12347.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1288-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhong Y, Chao D, Deng S et al (2018) Confining sulfur in integrated composite scaffold with highly porous carbon fibers/vanadium nitride arrays for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28:1706391–1706399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peng HJ, Xu WT, Zhu L et al (2016) 3D carbonaceous current collectors: the origin of enhanced cycling stability for high-sulfur-loading lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26:6351–6358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rehman S, Gu X, Khan K et al (2016) 3D vertically aligned and interconnected porous carbon nanosheets as sulfur immobilizers for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:1502518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li GR, Ling M, Ye YF et al (2015) Acacia senegal-inspired bifunctional binder for longevity of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500878–1500885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang M, Yang J, Xi B et al (2018) Enhancing kinetics of Li–S batteries by graphene-like N, S-codoped biochar fabricated in NaCl non-aqueous ionic liquid. Sci China Mater 62:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pang Q, Tang J, Huang H et al (2015) A nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27:6021–6028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu QC, Xu JJ, Xu D, Zhang XB (2015) Flexible lithium–oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat Commun 6:7892–7899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liao F, Światowska J, Maurice V et al (2014) Ageing mechanisms of conversion-type electrode material studied on iron sulfide thin films. Electrochim Acta 120:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eshetu GG, Judez X, Li C et al (2017) Lithium azide as an electrolyte additive for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56:15368–15372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun Y, Li Y, Sun J, Li Y, Pei A, Cui Y (2017) Stabilized Li3N for efficient battery cathode prelithiation. Energy Storage Mater 6:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ma JL, Bao D, Shi M-M, Yan JM, Zhang XB (2017) Reversible nitrogen fixation based on a rechargeable lithium–nitrogen battery for energy storage. Chem 2:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pei F, Lin L, Fu A et al (2018) A two-dimensional porous carbon-modified separator for high-energy-density Li–S batteries. Joule 2:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Research Center for Waste Oil Recovery Technology and Equipment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and New Environmental Materials, College of Environment and ResourcesChongqing Technology and Business UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and EnvironmentNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations