Advertisement

Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using polymer nanotubes

  • Sheng Yu
  • Guoming Yuan
  • Hejun GaoEmail author
  • Yunwen LiaoEmail author
Composites & nanocomposites
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The self-assembled polymer nanotubes were obtained by a simple solvothermal method. Its physicochemical properties were characterized by SEM, BET, TGA, FT-IR, XPS, and solid-state 13C magnetic resonance. The effects of initial pH, dosage, and coexisting ions were evaluated for its Cr(VI) adsorption performances. The result showed that polymer nanotubes surface had a large number of organic functional groups and porous structures. In 140 mg/L Cr(VI) solution, polymer nanotubes obtained the largest Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of 147.81 mg/g. Adsorption kinetics and isotherms agreed well with the pseudo-second-order and Redlich–Peterson models, respectively. The desorption process showed that the polymer nanotubes were easy to regenerate in strong polarity solution and had a high removal efficiency. Ionic strength played an important role in the adsorption and the adsorption interaction contained electrostatic interaction, reduction, and chelation in this work. The self-assembly method will constitute a highly efficient adsorbent.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2018JY0115), the Application Technology Research and Development Special Project of Nanchong, China (18YFZJ0035), the Meritocracy Research Funds of China West Normal University (17YC013, 17YC139), and the Open Fund of Sichuan Key Laboratory of Chemical Synthesis and Pollution Control (No. CSPC2015-6-2).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wu Y, Pang H, Liu Y et al (2019) Environmental remediation of heavy metal ions by novel-nanomaterials: a review. Environ Pollut 246:608–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valentín-Reyes J, García-Reyes RB, García-González A, Soto-Regalado E, Cerino-Córdova F (2019) Adsorption mechanisms of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions on modified activated carbon. J Environ Manag 236:815–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng W, An Q, Lei Z, Xiao Z, Zhai S, Liu Q (2016) Efficient batch and column removal of Cr(VI) by carbon beads with developed nano-network. RSC Adv 6:104897–104910.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra14070j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vakili M, Deng S, Li T, Wang W, Wang W, Yu G (2018) Novel crosslinked chitosan for enhanced adsorption of hexavalent chromium in acidic solution. Chem Eng J 347:782–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan SU, Islam DT, Farooqi IH, Ayub S, Basheer F (2019) Hexavalent chromium removal in an electrocoagulation column reactor: process optimization using CCD, adsorption kinetics and pH modulated sludge formation. Process Saf Environ Prot 122:118–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang L, Xia W, Liu X, Zhang W (2015) Synthesis of titanium cross-linked chitosan composite for efficient adsorption and detoxification of hexavalent chromium from water. J Mater Chem A 3:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta05194g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    GilPavas E, Dobrosz-Gómez I, Gómez-García M-Á (2019) Optimization and toxicity assessment of a combined electrocoagulation, H2O2/Fe2+/UV and activated carbon adsorption for textile wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 651:551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ge G, Yuanlai X, Xinxin Y et al (2017) Effect of HNO3 concentration on a novel silica-based adsorbent for separating Pd(II) from simulated high level liquid waste. Sci Rep 7:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11879-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng X, Yu N, Wang X et al (2018) Adsorption properties of granular activated carbon-supported titanium dioxide particles for dyes and copper ions. Sci Rep 8:6463.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24891-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peng X, Gao F, Zhao J, Li J, Qu J, Fan H (2018) Self-assembly of a graphene oxide/MnFe2O4 motor by coupling shear force with capillarity for removal of toxic heavy metals. J Mater Chem A 6:20861–20868.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta06663a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah LA, Khan M, Javed R et al (2018) Superabsorbent polymer hydrogels with good thermal and mechanical properties for removal of selected heavy metal ions. J Clean Prod 201:78–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhan Y, He S, Wan X et al (2018) Easy-handling bamboo-like polypyrrole nanofibrous mats with high adsorption capacity for hexavalent chromium removal. J Colloid Interface Sci 529:385–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.06.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ko D, Mines PD, Jakobsen MH, Yavuz CT, Hansen HCB, Andersen HR (2018) Disulfide polymer grafted porous carbon composites for heavy metal removal from stormwater runoff. Chem Eng J 348:685–692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao G, Huang X, Tang Z, Huang Q, Niu F, Wang X (2018) Polymer-based nanocomposites for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solution: a review. Polym Chem 9:3562–3582.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8py00484f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang WJ, Wu Y, Gao TT, Wei YQ, Zhou GW (2018) Facile preparation of hybrid porous polyanilines for highly efficient Cr(VI) removal. RSC Adv 8:33217–33227.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra07026a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tu T, Assenmacher W, Peterlik H, Schnakenburg G, Dötz KH (2008) Pyridine-bridged benzimidazolium salts: synthesis, aggregation, and application as phase-transfer catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:7127–7131.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200801628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang Z, Ren L, Jin L et al (2018) In-situ functionalization of poly(m-phenylenediamine) nanoparticles on bacterial cellulose for chromium removal. Chem Eng J 344:441–452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen X, Huang Y, Zhang K, Feng X, Wang M (2017) Synthesis and high-performance of carbonaceous polypyrrole nanotubes coated with SnS2 nanosheets anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Chem Eng J 330:470–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fellenz N, Perez-Alonso FJ, Martin PP et al (2017) Chromium (VI) removal from water by means of adsorption–reduction at the surface of amino-functionalized MCM-41 sorbents. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 239:138–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shao L, Wang S, Liu M, Huang J, Liu Y-N (2018) Triazine-based hyper-cross-linked polymers derived porous carbons for CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 339:509–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li B, Guan Z, Wang W et al (2012) Highly dispersed Pd catalyst locked in knitting aryl network polymers for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions of aryl chlorides in aqueous media. Adv Mater 24:3390–3395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Balaban A, Dinculescu A, Elguero J, Faure R (1985) Carbon-13 NMR studies of primary amines and their corresponding 2,4,6-trimethyl-pyridinium salts. Magn Reson Chem 23:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu C, Wang H, Wang Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Fan G (2019) Ruthenium coordinated with triphenylphosphine-hyper-crosslinked polymer: an efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction and hydrolysis of ammonia borane. Appl Surf Sci 466:193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang S, Wang X, Li J, Wen T, Xu J, Wang X (2014) Efficient removal of a typical dye and Cr(VI) reduction using N-doped magnetic porous carbon. RSC Adv 4:63110–63117.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10189H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun X, Yang L, Xing H et al (2013) Synthesis of polyethylenimine-functionalized poly (glycidyl methacrylate) magnetic microspheres and their excellent Cr(VI) ion removal properties. Chem Eng J 234:338–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gao H, Du J, Liao Y (2019) Removal of chromium (VI) and orange II from aqueous solution using magnetic polyetherimide/sugarcane bagasse. Cellulose 26:3285–3297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02301-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huang J, Liu Y, Wang X (2008) Selective adsorption of tannin from flavonoids by organically modified attapulgite clay. J Hazard Mater 160:382–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Setyono D, Valiyaveettil S (2015) Functionalized paper—a readily accessible adsorbent for removal of dissolved heavy metal salts and nanoparticles from water. J Hazard Mater 302:120–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Du J, Zhang L, Gao H, Liao Y (2017) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using poly(AA-co-DVB). J Dispers Sci Technol 38:1489–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2016.1255955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deng L, Shi Z, Wang L, Zhou S (2017) Fabrication of a novel NiFe2O4/Zn-Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with EDTA composite and its adsorption behavior for Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Solids 104:79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2016.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu X, Liao Y, Gao H (2018) Enhancement adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution on polypyrrole using ethylamine group. J Dispers Sci Technol 39:1394–1402.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2017.1404917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Terangpi P, Chakraborty S, Ray M (2018) Improved removal of hexavalent chromium from 10 mg/L solution by new micron sized polymer clusters of aniline formaldehyde condensate. Chem Eng J 350:599–607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dautoo UK, Shandil Y, Chauhan GS (2017) New crosslinked hydrazide–based polymers as Cr(VI) ions adsorbents. J Environ Chem Eng 5:5815–5826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.10.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khare P, Yadav A, Ramkumar J, Verma N (2016) Microchannel-embedded metal–carbon–polymer nanocomposite as a novel support for chitosan for efficient removal of hexavalent chromium from water under dynamic conditions. Chem Eng J 293:44–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Preethi J, Vigneshwaran S, Meenakshi S (2019) Performance of chitosan engraved iron and lanthanum mixed oxyhydroxide for the detoxification of hexavalent chromium. Int J Biol Macromol 130:491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rangabhashiyam S, Balasubramanian P (2018) Adsorption behaviors of hazardous methylene blue and hexavalent chromium on novel materials derived from Pterospermum acerifolium shells. J Mol Liq 254:433–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mthombeni NH, Onyango MS, Aoyi O (2015) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium onto magnetic natural zeolite-polymer composite. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 50:242–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2014.12.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kahu SS, Shekhawat A, Saravanan D, Jugade RM (2016) Two fold modified chitosan for enhanced adsorption of hexavalent chromium from simulated wastewater and industrial effluents. Carbohydr Polym 146:264–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang Y, Chen B, Zhang L et al (2011) Controlled assembly of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles on graphene oxide. Nanoscale 3:1446–1450.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00776e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang L, Gao H, Liao Y (2016) Preparation and application of poly(AMPS-co-DVB) to remove Rhodamine B from aqueous solutions. React Funct Polym 104:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang H, Yuan X, Wu Y et al (2015) Facile synthesis of polypyrrole decorated reduced graphene oxide–Fe3O4 magnetic composites and its application for the Cr(VI) removal. Chem Eng J 262:597–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Synthesis and Pollution Control Key Laboratory of Sichuan ProvinceChina West Normal UniversityNanchongChina
  2. 2.Institute of Applied ChemistryChina West Normal UniversityNanchongChina

Personalised recommendations