Advertisement

Iron phosphides supported on three-dimensional iron foam as an efficient electrocatalyst for water splitting reactions

  • Yunpeng Wang
  • Bo MaEmail author
  • Yantao ChenEmail author
Energy materials
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Development of inexpensive and high-performance electrocatalysts for water splitting is the major challenge for the scale-up production of gaseous hydrogen. Iron foam, which is composed of the second most abundant metal element on the earth, can boost the water splitting reactions after a simple treatment of surface phosphorization. The as-prepared electrocatalyst, which is denoted as FePx@Fe, exhibits an excellent activity in alkaline solutions, and requires overpotentials of 124 and 274 mV to approach 10 mA cm−2 for hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen evolution reaction, respectively. Meanwhile, FePx@Fe also shows a remarkable performance on overall water splitting, which only needs 1.67 V to reach 10 mA cm−2 and exhibits a satisfying long-term durability. The fabrication strategy of surface phosphorization on iron foam to obtain FePx@Fe can be valuable for the application of non-noble-metal electrocatalysts toward water splitting.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51702234) and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (No. 18JCQNJC78800).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3985_MOESM1_ESM.docx (11.6 mb)
Digital photo of the original IF and FePx@Fe; XRD patterns of FePx-4 and FePx-16; SEM image of the pre-cleaned IF; SEM image of the as-received IF without acid washing; SEM images of FePx-4 and FePx-16; SEM image of IF-400; SEM elemental mapping of Fe, P and O for FePx@Fe; N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of FePx@Fe, FePx-4, FePx-16 and IF; EDX spectrum of the as-prepared FePx@Fe in TEM; XPS survey spectrum of FePx@Fe; TEM, HRTEM imaging and elemental mapping of FePx@Fe after the HER durability test; XRD patterns of FePx@Fe after HER and OER durability test; CV curves of FePx@Fe, FePx-4 and FePx-16 between 0.55 and 0.65 V (vs RHE) under different scan rates; TEM, HRTEM imaging and elemental mapping of FePx@Fe after the OER durability test; comparison of the electrocatalytic activity of FePx@Fe on HER with other recently reported TMP-based electrocatalysts in alkaline solution; comparison of the electrocatalytic activity of FePx@Fe on OER with other recently reported TMP-based electrocatalysts in alkaline solution; comparison of the electrocatalytic activity of FePx@Fe on overall water splitting with other reported TMP-based electrocatalysts in alkaline solution are included in Supplementary Information (DOCX 11919 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Liu B, Zhao Y-F, Peng H-Q et al (2017) Nickel-cobalt diselenide 3D mesoporous nanosheet networks supported on ni foam: an all-ph highly efficient integrated electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Adv Mater 29(19):1606521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deng S, Zhong Y, Zeng Y et al (2017) Directional Construction of vertical nitrogen-doped 1T-2H MoSe2/graphene shell/core nanoflake arrays for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv Mater 29(21):1700748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lv L, Li Z, Ruan Y et al (2018) Nickel-iron diselenide hollow nanoparticles with strongly hydrophilic surface for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction activity. Electrochim Acta 286:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao X, Yang Y, Li Y, Cui X, Zhang Y, Xiao P (2016) NiCo-selenide as a novel catalyst for water oxidation. J Mater Sci 51(8):3724–3734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9690-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X, He J, Yu B et al (2019) CoSe2 nanoparticles embedded MOF-derived Co–N–C nanoflake arrays as efficient and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Catal B-Environ 258:117996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang X, Zheng B, Yu B et al (2018) In situ synthesis of hierarchical MoSe2–CoSe2 nanotubes as an efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in both acidic and alkaline media. J Mater Chem A 6(17):7842–7850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu B, Qi F, Zheng B et al (2018) Self-assembled pearl-bracelet-like CoSe2–SnSe2/CNT hollow architecture as highly efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 6(4):1655–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang H, Wang X, Yang D, Zheng B, Chen Y (2018) Co0.85Se hollow nanospheres anchored on N-doped graphene nanosheets as highly efficient, nonprecious electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in both acid and alkaline media. J Power Sources 400:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu Y-T, Xiao X, Ye Z-M et al (2017) Cage-Confinement Pyrolysis Route to Ultrasmall Tungsten Carbide Nanoparticles for Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J Am Chem Soc 139(15):5285–5288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li J-S, Wang Y, Liu C-H et al (2016) Coupled molybdenum carbide and reduced graphene oxide electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun 7:11204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan J, He X, Yin F et al (2019) β-Mo2C/N, P-co-doped carbon as highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Sci 54(6):4589–4600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03190-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu Y, D-g Guan BYu et al (2018) Scalable synthesis of Mo2C/CNT networks as highly efficient and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim Acta 263:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu Y, Chen G, Xu X, Yang G, Liu M, Shao Z (2017) Enhancing electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution by strongly coupled molybdenum Nitride@Nitrogen-doped carbon porous nano-octahedrons. ACS Catal 7(5):3540–3547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma Y, He Z, Wu Z et al (2017) Galvanic-replacement mediated synthesis of copper-nickel nitrides as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 5(47):24850–24858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen Q, Wang R, Yu M et al (2017) Bifunctional iron–nickel nitride nanoparticles as flexible and robust electrode for overall water splitting. Electrochim Acta 247:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang R, Huang J, Chen G et al (2019) In situ engineering bi-metallic phospho-nitride bi-functional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Appl Catal B-Environ 254:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen Y, Ren R, Wen Z et al (2018) Superior electrocatalysis for hydrogen evolution with crumpled graphene/tungsten disulfide/tungsten trioxide ternary nanohybrids. Nano Energy 47:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Le Y, Yu XB, Xin W, Wen LX (2016) General formation of M-MoS3 (M = Co, Ni) hollow structures with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. Adv Mater 28(1):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin Y, Han J, Zhang Y et al (2016) Contributions of phase, sulfur vacancies, and edges to the hydrogen evolution reaction catalytic activity of porous molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 138(25):7965–7972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang S, Sun Y, Liao F, Shen Y, Shi H, Shao M (2018) Co9S8-CuS-FeS trimetal sulfides for excellent oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. Electrochim Acta 283:1695–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin R, Lin T, Huang J, Huang X, Liu Y (2018) Hierarchical cobalt sulfide with vertical in-plane edge structure for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochim Acta 281:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma B, Yang Z, Yuan Z, Chen Y (2018) Effective surface roughening of three-dimensional copper foam via sulfurization treatment as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(3):1620–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang H, Zhou H, Zhang W, Yao S (2018) Urea-assisted synthesis of amorphous molybdenum sulfide on P-doped carbon nanotubes for enhanced hydrogen evolution. J Mater Sci 53(12):8951–8962.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2226-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang J, Li Y, Xia Y et al (2017) Flexible cobalt phosphide network electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution at all pH values. Nano Res 10(3):1010–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song J, Zhu C, Xu BZ et al (2017) Bimetallic cobalt-based phosphide zeolitic imidazolate framework: CoPx phase-dependent electrical conductivity and hydrogen atom adsorption energy for efficient overall water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 7(2):1601555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tabassum H, Guo W, Meng W et al (2017) Metal-organic frameworks derived cobalt phosphide architecture encapsulated into B/N co-doped graphene nanotubes for all pH value electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Adv Energy Mater 7(9):1601671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lan Q, Lin Y, Li Y, Liu D (2018) MOF-derived, CeOx-modified CoP/carbon composites for oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reactions. J Mater Sci 53(17):12123–12131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2519-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    X Wang, Y Chen, B Yu et al (2019) Hierarchically porous W-doped CoP nanoflake arrays as highly efficient and stable electrocatalyst for pH-universal hydrogen evolution. Small.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201902613 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang D, Hou W, Lu Y, Zhang W, Chen Y (2019) Scalable synthesis of self-assembled bimetallic phosphide/N-doped graphene nanoflakes as an efficient electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Nanoscale 11(27):12837–12845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang D, Hou W, Lu Y, Wang X, Zhang W, Chen Y (2019) Scalable synthesis of bimetallic phosphide decorated in carbon nanotube network as multifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(15):13031–13040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lu Y, Hou W, Yang D, Chen Y (2019) CoP nanosheets in-situ grown on N-doped graphene as an efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Electrochim Acta 307:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jiang D, Ma W, Zhou Y, Xing Y, Quan B, Li D (2019) Coupling Co2P and CoP nanoparticles with copper ions incorporated Co9S8 nanowire arrays for synergistically boosting hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. J Colloid Interf Sci 550:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang X, Li W, Xiong D, Petrovykh DY, Liu L (2016) Bifunctional nickel phosphide nanocatalysts supported on carbon fiber paper for highly efficient and stable overall water splitting. Adv Funct Mater 26(23):4067–4077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ma B, Yang Z, Chen Y, Yuan Z (2018) Nickel cobalt phosphide with three-dimensional nanostructure as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in both acidic and alkaline electrolytes. Nano Res 12(2):375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang H, Wang X, Zheng B, Yang D, Zhang W, Chen Y (2019) Self-assembled Ni2P/FeP heterostructural nanoparticles embedded in N-doped graphene nanosheets as highly efficient and stable multifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. Electrochim Acta 318:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thi MLN, Tran TH, Hai Anh PD, Nhac-Vu HT, Bui QB (2019) Hierarchical zinc–nickel phosphides nanosheets on 3D nickel foam as self-support electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Polyhedron 168:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xu X, Tian X, Zhong Z, Kang L, Yao J (2019) In-situ growth of iron/nickel phosphides hybrid on nickel foam as bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. J Power Sources 424:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hou M, Teng X, Wang J et al (2018) Multiscale porous molybdenum phosphide of honeycomb structure for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale 10(30):14594–14599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li J-S, Sha J-Q, Du B, Tang B (2017) Highly efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts based on coupled molybdenum phosphide and reduced graphene oxide derived from MOFs. Cheml Commun 53(93):12576–12579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu Z, Wang J, Zhu J et al (2017) Highly efficient and stable MoP-rGO nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 232:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang D, Shen Y, Zhang X, Wu Z (2017) Enhanced hydrogen evolution from the MoP/C hybrid by the modification of Ketjen Black. J Mater Sci 52(6):3337–3343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0621-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pi M, Wu T, Zhang D, Chen S, Wang S (2016) Phase-controlled synthesis and comparative study of α- and β-WP2 submicron particles as efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 216:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pu Z, Amiinu IS, Zhang C, Wang M, Kou Z, Mu S (2017) Phytic acid-derivative transition metal phosphides encapsulated in N, P-codoped carbon: an efficient and durable hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst in a wide pH range. Nanoscale 9(10):3555–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang F, Yang X, Dong B, Yu X, Xue H, Feng L (2018) A FeP powder electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochem Commun 92:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lin C, Gao Z, Yang J, Liu B, Jin J (2018) Porous superstructures constructed from ultrafine FeP nanoparticles for highly active and exceptionally stable hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 6(15):6387–6392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tian L, Yan X, Chen X (2016) Electrochemical activity of iron phosphide nanoparticles in hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Catal 6(8):5441–5448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jiang P, Liu Q, Liang Y, Tian J, Asiri AM, Sun X (2014) A cost-effective 3D hydrogen evolution cathode with high catalytic activity: FeP nanowire array as the active phase. Angew Chem 53(47):12855–12859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tian J, Liu Q, Liang Y, Xing Z, Asiri AM, Sun X (2014) FeP nanoparticles film grown on carbon cloth: an ultrahighly active 3D hydrogen evolution cathode in both acidic and neutral solutions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(23):20579–20584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang X, Lu A-Y, Zhu Y et al (2015) Rugae-like FeP nanocrystal assembly on a carbon cloth: an exceptionally efficient and stable cathode for hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale 7(25):10974–10981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xiong D, Wang X, Li W, Liu L (2016) Facile synthesis of iron phosphide nanorods for efficient and durable electrochemical oxygen evolution. Chem Commun 52(56):8711–8714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu S, Sankar KV, Kundu A, Ma M, Kwon J-Y, Jun SC (2017) Honeycomb-like interconnected network of nickel phosphide heteronanoparticles with superior electrochemical performance for supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(26):21829–21838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li D, Liao Q, Ren B, Jin Q, Cui H, Wang C (2017) A 3D-composite structure of FeP nanorods supported by vertically aligned graphene for the high-performance hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 5(22):11301–11308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Conway BE, Tilak BV (2002) Interfacial processes involving electrocatalytic evolution and oxidation of H2, and the role of chemisorbed H. Electrochim Acta 47(22):3571–3594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang R, Wang X, Yu S et al (2017) Ternary NiCo2Px NANOWIRES as pH-universal electrocatalysts for highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv Mater 29(9):1605502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Han S, Liang Z, Wageh S et al (2015) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of 2D hexagonal nanoplates of α-Fe2O3/graphene composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Adv Funct Mater 24(36):5719–5727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wang K, Wu C, Wang F, Liu C, Yu C, Jiang G (2018) In-situ insertion of carbon nanotubes into metal-organic frameworks-derived α-Fe2O3 polyhedrons for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of nitrite. Electrochim Acta 285:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shao P, Ren Z, Tian J et al (2017) Silica hydrogel-mediated dissolution-recrystallization strategy for synthesis of ultrathin α-Fe2O3 nanosheets with highly exposed (110) facets: a superior photocatalyst for degradation of bisphenol S. Chem Eng J 323:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jin S (2017) Are metal chalcogenides, nitrides, and phosphides oxygen evolution catalysts or bifunctional catalysts? ACS Energy Lett 2(8):1937–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory for Photoelectric Materials and Devices, School of Materials Science and EngineeringTianjin University of TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations