Advertisement

Urease adsorption immobilization on ionic liquid-like macroporous polymeric support

  • Hongjin Kim
  • Fatima Hassouna
  • František Muzika
  • Merve Arabacı
  • Dušan Kopecký
  • Ivona Sedlářová
  • Miroslav ŠoóšEmail author
Materials for life sciences
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, we report the synthesis and application of polymeric macroporous materials functionalized with ionic liquid (IL)-like moieties to serve as a support for enzyme immobilization. The method was based on bottom-up approach, where poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) (PS–DVB) nanoparticles were used as building blocks to form porous structures. Surface functionalization was done by introducing 1-butyl imidazole into the PS–DVB support to form IL-like imidazolium, which was consequently used for enzyme adsorption immobilization on the porous surface. To demonstrate activity of immobilized enzyme, hydrolysis of urea catalyzed by Jack bean urease was used as a model reaction. The enzymatic activity of the urease to convert urea solution into carbon dioxide (hydrocarbonates in water solution) and ammonia under acidic conditions were monitored both by measuring changes in pH and by a color change in cresol red pH indicator. The immobilized urease was able to provide hydrolysis of urea solution for 30 days while maintaining its activity over 100% compared to free enzyme solution. The activity of freshly immobilized enzyme was increased up to 285% compared to free urease solution under acidic conditions, which is caused by an acidic shift of activity–pH bell-shaped curve. Prepared porous material with immobilized urease was able to undergo four consequent cycles over the period of 4 days with only 15% decrease in activity. Overall, the results indicated that the polymeric support is well suitable to combine the advantages of macroporous material with IL-like surface moieties for enzyme immobilization and its consequent application in bio-catalytic reactions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Czech Science Foundation (GACR) Grant 16-22997S and a Specific University Research Grant MSMT No. 20/2019. František Muzika was supported by the Grant 18-24397S from the Czech Science Foundation (GACR).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3980_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2722 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hentze H-P, Antonietti M (2008) Porous polymers and resins. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okay O (2000) Macroporous copolymer networks. Prog Polym Sci 25:711–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sherrington DC (1998) Preparation, structure and morphology of polymer supports. Chem Commun 21:2275–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lv Y, Lin Z, Tan T, Svec F (2014) Preparation of reusable bioreactors using reversible immobilization of enzyme on monolithic porous polymer support with attached gold nanoparticles. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urban J, Svec F, Fréchet JMJ (2012) A monolithic lipase reactor for biodiesel production by transesterification of triacylglycerides into fatty acid methyl esters. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Izquierdo DF, Yates M, Lozano P, Burguete MI, García-Verdugo E, Luis SV (2014) Macroporous polymers tailored as supports for large biomolecules: ionic liquids as porogenic solvents and as surface modifiers. React Funct Polym 85:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garcia-Diego C, Cuellar J (2005) Synthesis of macroporous poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) microparticles using n-heptane as the porogen: quantitative effects of the DVB concentration and the monomeric fraction on their structural characteristics. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:8237–8247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Afeyan NB, Fulton SP, Gordon NF, Mazsaroff I, Várady L, Regnier FE (1990) Perfusion chromatography: an approach to purifying biomolecules. Bio/Technology 8:203–206Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang QC, Hosoya K, Svec F, Frechet JMJ (1992) Polymeric porogens used in the preparation of novel monodispersed macroporous polymeric separation media for high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 64:1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perrier-Cornet R, Héroguez V, Thienpont A, Babot O, Toupance T (2008) Functional crosslinked polymer particles synthesized by precipitation polymerization for liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1179:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Svec F, Frechet JMJ (1996) New designs of macroporous polymers and supports: from separation to biocatalysis. Science 273:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luis SV, Garcia-Verdugo E (eds) (2009) Chemical reactions and processes under flow conditions. Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shih Y-H, Singco B, Liu W-L, Hsu C-H, Huang H-Y (2011) A rapid synthetic method for organic polymer-based monoliths in a room temperature ionic liquid medium via microwave-assisted vinylization and polymerization. Green Chem 13:296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singco B, Lin C-L, Cheng Y-J, Shih Y-H, Huang H-Y (2012) Ionic liquids as porogens in the microwave-assisted synthesis of methacrylate monoliths for chromatographic application. Anal Chim Acta 746:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubisa P (2009) Ionic liquids as solvents for polymerization processes—progress and challenges. Prog Polym Sci 34:1333–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erdmenger T, Guerrero-Sanchez C, Vitz J, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US (2010) Recent developments in the utilization of green solvents in polymer chemistry. Chem Soc Rev 39:3317–3333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tripathi AK, Singh RK (2018) Immobilization induced molecular compression of ionic liquid in ordered mesoporous matrix. J Phys D Appl Phys 51:075301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tripathi AK, Verma YL, Shalu, Singh VK, Balo L, Gupta H, Singh SK, Singh VK (2017) Quasi solid-state electrolytes based on ionic liquid (IL) and ordered mesoporous matrix MCM-41 for supercapacitor application. J Solid State Electrochem 21:3365–3371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plechkova NV, Seddon KR (2008) Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry. Chem Soc Rev 37:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tripathi AK, Singh RK (2018) Development of ionic liquid and lithium salt immobilized MCM-41 quasi solid–liquid electrolytes for lithium batteries. J Energy Storage 15:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kubisa P (2004) Application of ionic liquids as solvents for polymerization processes. Prog Polym Sci 29:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marti N, Quattrini F, Butte A, Morbidelli M (2005) Production of polymeric materials with controlled pore structure: the ‘‘Reactive gelation’’ process. Macromol Mater Eng 290:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lamprou A, Köse I, Peña Aguirre Z, Storti G, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2014) Macroporous polymer particles via reactive gelation under shear: effect of primary particle properties and operating parameters. Langmuir 30:13970–13978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lamprou A, Köse I, Storti G, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2014) Synthesis of macroporous polymer particles using reactive gelation under shear. Langmuir 30:6946–6953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meakin P (1988) Fractal aggregates. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 28:249–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brand B, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2015) Shear-induced reactive gelation. Langmuir 31:12727–12735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bechtle M, Butte A, Storti G, Morbidelli M (2010) Preparation of macroporous methacrylate-based monoliths for chromatographic applications by the reactive gelation process. J Chromatogr A 1217:4675–4681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Neuville BC, Lamprou A, Morbidelli M, Soos M (2014) Perfusive ion-exchange chromatographic materials with high capacity. J Chromatogr A 1374:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lamprou A, Gavriilidou A-F-M, Storti G, Soos M, Morbidelli M (2015) Application of polymeric macroporous supports for temperature-responsive chromatography of pharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr A 1407:90–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cui S, Zhou Q-W, Wang X-L et al (2017) Immobilization of lipase onto N-succinyl-chitosan beads and its application in the enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish oil. J Food Biochem 41:e12395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rath P, Tripathi P, Kayastha AM (2012) Immobilization of α-amylase from germinated mung beans (Vigna radiata) on Fuller’s earth by adsorption. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 21:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lassouane F, Aït-Amar H, Amrani S, Rodriguez-Couto S (2019) A promising laccase immobilization approach for Bisphenol A removal from aqueous solutions. Bioresour Technol 271:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rojas-Mercado AS, Moreno-Cortez IE, Lucio-Porto R, Pavón LL (2018) Encapsulation and immobilization of ficin extract in electrospun polymeric nanofibers. Int J Biol Macromol 118:2287–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baysal Z, Aksoy E, Dolak İ, Ersöz A, Say R (2018) Adsorption behaviours of lysozyme onto poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate cryogels containing methacryloyl antipyrine-Ce(III). Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 67:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao K, Cao X, Di Q et al (2017) Synthesis, characterization and optimization of a two-step immobilized lipase. Renew Energy 103:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weiss WF, Hodgdon TK, Kaler EW, Lenhoff AM, Roberts CJ (2007) Nonnative protein polymers: structure, morphology, and relation to nucleation and growth. Biophys J 93:4392–4403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grancic P, Illeova V, Polakovic M, Sefcik J (2012) Thermally induced inactivation and aggregation of urease: experiments and population balance modelling. Chem Eng Sci 70:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cui J, Sun B, Lin T, Feng Y, Jia S (2018) Enzyme shielding by mesoporous organosilica shell on Fe3O4@silica yolk–shell nanospheres. Int J Biol Macromol 117:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pogorilyi RP, Goncharik VP, Kozhara LI, Zub YL (2008) Covalent immobilization of urease on polysiloxane matrices containing 3-aminopropyl and 3-mercaptopropyl groups. Appl Biochem Microbiol 44:561–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zambelli B, Musiani F, Benini S, Ciurli S (2011) Chemistry of Ni2+ in urease: sensing, trafficking, and catalysis. Acc Chem Res 44:520–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang S, Lee MH, Hausinger RP, Clark PA, Wilcox DE, Scott RA (1994) Structure of the dinuclear active site of urease. X-ray absorption spectroscopic study of native and 2-mercaptoethanol-inhibited bacterial and plant enzymes. Inorg Chem 33:1589–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nielsen JE, McCammon JA (2003) Calculating pKa values in enzyme active sites. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc 12:1894–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang D, Fan J, Cao F, Deng Z, Pojman JA, Ji L (2019) Immobilization adjusted clock reaction in the urea–urease–H+ reaction system. RSC Adv 9:3514–3519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hu G, Pojman JA, Scott SK, Wrobel MM, Taylor AF (2010) Base-catalyzed feedback in the urea–urease reaction. J Phys Chem B 114:14059–14063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bubanja IN, Bánsági T, Taylor AF (2018) Kinetics of the urea–urease clock reaction with urease immobilized in hydrogel beads. React Kinet Mech Catal 123:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hoare JP, Laidler KJ (1950) The molecular kinetics of the urea–urease system. II. The inhibition by products. J Am Chem Soc 72:2487–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marzadori C, Miletti S, Gessa C, Ciurli S (1998) Immobilization of jack bean urease on hydroxyapatite: urease immobilization in alkaline soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1485–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhou J, Cao J, Huang W et al (2013) Preparation and property of urease immobilization with cationic poly(4-vinylpyridine) functionalized colloidal particles. Chem Biochem Eng Q 27:431–437Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Brito AK, Nordi CSF, Caseli L (2015) Algal polysaccharides as matrices for the immobilization of urease in lipid ultrathin films studied with tensiometry and vibrational spectroscopy: physical–chemical properties and implications in the enzyme activity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 135:639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kirdeciler SK, Soy E, Öztürk S et al (2011) A novel urea conductometric biosensor based on zeolite immobilized urease. Talanta 85:1435–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jia W, Wang B, Wang C, Sun H (2017) Tourmaline and biochar for the remediation of acid soil polluted with heavy metals. J Environ Chem Eng 5:2107–2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ispirli Doğaç Y, Deveci İ, Teke M, Mercimek B (2014) TiO2 beads and TiO2–chitosan beads for urease immobilization. Mater Sci Eng, C 42:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Somturk B, Yilmaz I, Altinkaynak C, Karatepe A, Özdemir N, Ocsoy I (2016) Synthesis of urease hybrid nanoflowers and their enhanced catalytic properties. Enzyme Microb Technol 86:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tang X, Liu S, Wang S, Zhang Q, Cheng Z (2014) Preparation of reversibly immobilized Jack bean urease on microchannel surface and application for enzyme inhibition assay. Microfluid Nanofluid 17:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Srivastava PK, Kayastha AM, Srinivasan (2001) Characterization of gelatin-immobilized pigeonpea urease and preparation of a new urea biosensor. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 34:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Singh AK, Singh M, Verma N (2017) Extraction, purification, kinetic characterization and immobilization of urease from Bacillus sphaericus MTCC 5100. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 12:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    de Melo JV, Cosnier S, Mousty C, Martelet C, Jaffrezic-Renault N (2002) Urea biosensors based on immobilization of urease into two oppositely charged clays (laponite and Zn–Al layered double hydroxides). Anal Chem 74:4037–4043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Syu M-J, Chang Y-S (2009) Ionic effect investigation of a potentiometric sensor for urea and surface morphology observation of entrapped urease/polypyrrole matrix. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2671–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Agelis G, Resvani A, Durdagi S et al (2012) The discovery of new potent non-peptide Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockers: a concise synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of N-substituted 5-butylimidazole derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 55:358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Blesic M, Nimal Gunaratne HQ, Nockemann P, McCarron P, Seddon KR (2013) Controlled fragrance delivery in functionalised ionic liquid–enzyme systems. RSC Adv 3:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Soos M, Lattuada M, Sefcik J, Morbidelli M (2009) Interpretation of light scattering and turbidity measurements in aggregated systems: effect of intra-cluster multiple-light scattering. J Phys Chem B 113:14962–14970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kerker M (1969) The scattering of light. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bohren DR, Huffman CF (1983) Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sorensen CM (2001) Light scattering by fractal aggregates: a review. Aerosol Sci Technol 35:648–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lin M, Lindsay HM, Weitz DA, Klein R, Ball RC, Meakin P (1990) Universal reaction-limited aggregation. Phys Rev A 41:2005–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sandkühler P, Lattuada M, Wu H, Sefcik J, Morbidelli M (2005) Further insights into the universality of colloidal aggregation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 113:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Krajewska B, Ciurli S (2005) Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) urease. probing acid–base groups of the active site by pH variation. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:651–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Chemistry and TechnologyPrague 6 – DejviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Physics and MeasurementsUniversity of Chemistry and TechnologyPrague 6 – DejviceCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Inorganic TechnologyUniversity of Chemistry and TechnologyPrague 6 – DejviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations