Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 389–403 | Cite as

Polyvinylidene fluoride membrane modified by tea polyphenol for dye removal

  • Rui ZhangEmail author
  • Yi Liu
  • Yu Li
  • Qiong Han
  • Tongqing Zhang
  • Kunlin Zeng
  • Chen Zhao
Polymers & biopolymers
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were surface-modified via a simple coating method for improvement of the hydrophilicity performance. In this work, TP/PEI/PVDF modified membrane was successfully prepared by using tea polyphenol as a multifunctional coating. The physicochemical properties of membranes were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The water contact angle, pure water flux and methylene blue rejection ratio of membranes were investigated in detail. Compared with the pristine membrane, the water contact angle of the modified membrane decreased to 48.8°, and the rejection ratios were increased to 95.2% when the modified membrane was used to separate methylene blue. In addition, the modified membrane showed excellent antifouling performance in the experiment, and the flux recovery ratio still reached 84.6% after three fouling/washing cycles. In the oxidation experiment, the modified membranes were immersed in KMnO4 solution for 6 h, and the results show that the water contact angle, pure water flux and methylene blue rejection of the modified membranes only have changed slightly. Therefore, this study could have a great potential for widening the application of membranes in the treatment of dye wastewater containing oxidants.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

References

  1. 1.
    Drioli E, Ali A, Macedonio F (2015) Membrane distillation: recent developments and perspectives. Desalination 356:56–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu Y, Wang D, Jiang L, Jin J (2014) Recent progress in developing advanced membranes for emulsified oil/water separation. NPG Asia Mater 6:101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313:1068–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peters T (2010) Membrane technology for water treatment. Chem Eng Technol 33:1233–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheryan M, Rajagopalan N (1998) Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction. J Membr Sci 151:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun H, Yang X, Zhang Y, Cheng X, Xu Y, Bai Y (2018) Segregation-induced in situ hydrophilic modification of poly (vinylidene fluoride) ultrafiltration membranes via sticky poly (ethylene glycol) blending. J Membr Sci 563:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu H, Mansouri J, Chen V (2013) Silica nanoparticles as carriers of antifouling ligands for PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 433:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang Q, Jian-Er Z, Wang Y (2014) Application of ceramic microfiltration membrane modified by nano-TiO2 coating in separation of a stable oil-in-water emulsion. J Membr Sci 456:128–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Y, Zhu X, Liu D, Wang J, Li J, Jang L (2014) Salt-induced fabrication of superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic PAA-g-PVDF membranes for effective separation of oil-in-water emulsions. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:856–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ye Q, Zhou F, Liu W (2011) Bioinspired catecholic chemistry for surface modification. Chem Soc Rev 40:4244–4258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu H, Bao S, Gong L, Ma R, Pan L, Li Y (2018) Superhydrophobic engineering materials provide a rapid and simple route for highly efficient self-driven crude oil spill cleanup. RSC Adv 8:38363–38369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang W, Shi Z, Zhang F, Liu X, Jin J, Jiang L (2013) Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic PVDF membranes for effective separation of water-in-oil emulsions with high flux. Adv Mater 25:2071–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Platt S, Nyström M (2007) Amido black staining of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA. Desalination 214:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arkhangelsky E, Kuzmenko D, Gitis V (2007) Impact of chemical cleaning on properties and functioning of polyethersulfone membranes. J Membr Sci 305:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madaeni SS, Sharifnia S, Moradi GR (2013) Chemical cleaning of microfiltration membranes fouled by whey. J Chin Chem Soc-taip 48:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madaeni SS, Mansourpanah Y (2001) Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane fouled by whey. Desalination 161:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu T, Meng L, Zhao QB, Shi Y, Hu HY, Lu Y (2017) Effects of chemical cleaning on RO membrane inorganic, organic and microbial foulant removal in a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation. Water Res 113:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hashim NA, Liu Y, Li K (2011) Stability of PVDF hollow fibre membranes in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution. Chem Eng Sci 66:1565–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao F, Wang J, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Hang MA (2016) Effects of sodium hypochlorite on structural/surface characteristics, filtration performance and fouling behaviors of PVDF membranes. J Membr Sci 519:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318:426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Y, Sun H, Sadam H, Liu Y, Shao L (2019) Supramolecular chemistry assisted construction of ultra-stable solvent-resistant membranes for angstrom-sized molecular separation. Chem Eng J 371:535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y, Ai K, Lu L (2014) Polydopamine and its derivative materials: synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev 114:5057–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun H, Zhang Y, Hussain S (2019) Novel mussel-inspired zwitterionic hydrophilic polymer to boost membrane water-treatment performance. J Membr Sci 582:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang X, Yan L, Wu Y, Liu Y, Shao L (2019) Biomimetic hydrophilization engineering on membrane surface for highly-efficient water purification. J Membr Sci 589:117223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrett DG, Sileika TS, Messersmith PB (2014) Molecular diversity in phenolic and polyphenolic precursors of tannin-inspired nanocoatings. Chem Commun 50:7265–7268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Annamalai J, Nallamuthu T (2015) Characterization of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles from aqueous extract of Chlorella vulgaris and their anti-pathogenic properties. Appl Nanosci 5:603–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Y, Shi ZX, Yin J (2011) facile synthesis of soluble graphene via a green reduction of graphene oxide in tea solution and its biocomposites. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1127–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mujeeb Rahman P, Abdul Mujeeb VM, Muraleedharan K (2017) Chitosan–green tea extract powder composite pouches for extending the shelf life of raw meat. Polym Bull 74:3399–3419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chakrabarty T, Pérez-Manríquez Liliana, Neelakanda P, Peinemann KV (2017) Bioinspired tannic acid-copper complexes as selective coating for nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 184:188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lim MY, Choi YS, Kim J, Kim K, Shin H, Kim JJ, Shin DM, Lee JC (2017) Cross-linked graphene oxide membrane having high ion selectivity and antibacterial activity prepared using tannic acid-functionalized graphene oxide and polyethyleneimine. J Membr Sci 521:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Qiu WZ, Du Y, Lv Y, Yang HC, Xu ZK (2017) Codeposition of catechol-polyethyleneimine followed by interfacial polymerization for nanofiltration membranes with enhanced stability. J Appl Polym Sci 134:45422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang X, Ren PF, Yang HC, Wan LS, Xu ZK (2016) Co-deposition of tannic acid and diethlyenetriamine for surface hydrophilization of hydrophobic polymer membranes. Appl Surf Sci 360:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang P, Tan KL, Kang ET, Neoh KG (2001) Synthesis, characterization and anti-fouling properties of poly(ethylene glycol) grafted poly(vinylidene fluoride) copolymer membranes. J Mater Chem 11:783–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cui Z, Hassankiadeh NT, Lee SY, Lee JM, Woo KT, Sanguineti A (2013) Poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane preparation with an environmental diluent via thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 444:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Madaeni SS, Zinadini S, Vatanpour V (2013) Preparation of superhydrophobic nanofiltration membrane by embedding multiwalled carbon nanotube and polydimethylsiloxane in pores of microfiltration membrane. Sep Purif Technol 111:98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arkhangelsky E, Kuzmenko D, Gitis NV, Vinogradov M, Kuiry S, Gitis V (2007) Hypochlorite cleaning causes degradation of polymer membranes. Tribol Lett 28:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Milardović S, Iveković D, Grabarić BS (2006) A novel amperometric method for antioxidant activity determination using DPPH free radical. Bioelectrochemistry 68:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang KY, Chung TS, Gryta M (2008) Hydrophobic PVDF hollow fiber membranes with narrow pore size distribution and ultra-thin skin for the fresh water production through membrane distillation. Chem Eng Sci 63:2587–2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Teyssedre G, Bernes A, Lacabanne C (1993) Influence of the crystalline phase on the molecular mobility of PVDF. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 31:2027–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huan S, Bai L, Cheng W, Han G (2016) Manufacture of electrospun all-aqueous poly(vinyl alcohol)/cellulose nanocrystal composite nanofibrous mats with enhanced properties through controlling fibers arrangement and microstructure. Polymer 92:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luo H, Gu C, Zheng W, Dai F, Wang X, Zheng Z (2015) Facile synthesis of novel size-controlled antibacterial hybrid spheres using silver nanoparticles loaded with poly-dopamine spheres. Rsc Adv 5:13470–13477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang HC, Wu MB, Li YJ, Chen YF, Wan LS, Xu ZK (2016) Effects of polyethyleneimine molecular weight and proportion on the membrane hydrophilization by codepositing with dopamine. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43792Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gaudichet-Maurin E, Thominette F (2006) Ageing of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes in contact with bleach solutions. J Membr Sci 282:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Han B, Zhang D, Shao Z, Kong L, Lv S (2013) Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate/carboxymethyl cellulose acetate blend ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 311:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations