Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 151–162 | Cite as

Simple synthesis of 3D flower-like g-C3N4/TiO2 composite microspheres for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity

  • Chaoyang Hu
  • Lei EEmail author
  • Kangkai Hu
  • Liuyuan Lai
  • Dan Zhao
  • Wei Zhao
  • Hui Rong
Chemical routes to materials

Abstract

3D flower-like g-C3N4/TiO2 composite microspheres (FCTCMs) were prepared by a simple solvothermal method and combined with a thermal treatment method. By controlling the amount of urea mixed with the 3D flower-like structure of TiO2 microspheres (FTMs), FCTCMs with different g-C3N4 loadings were prepared. Urea has two functions in the preparation process: one decomposes into gaseous substances during heat treatment at 550 °C to form g-C3N4 in the gap between nanosheets of TiO2 microspheres; and the other effectively protects the 3D flower-like structure of TiO2 microspheres (FTMs). The results of XRD, TEM, FT-IR, SEM and XPS indicate that g-C3N4 and TiO2 were connected in a surface-to-surface manner. Its photocatalytic performance was characterized by the degradation of methyl orange and methylene blue solution. The results show that the photocatalytic performance of FCTCMs under visible light was as twice as FTMs. The transient photocurrent responses and EIS results also indicate the increase in the number of photogenerated electron–hole pairs produced by FCTCMs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present work is supported financially by the key projects of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (16JCZDJC39100) and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Province of China (18JCYBJC87600).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3953_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (409 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 408 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Asghar A, Raman AAA, Ashri WM, Daud W (2015) Advanced oxidation processes for in situ production of hydrogen peroxide/hydroxyl radical for textile wastewater treatment: a review. J Clean Prod 87:826–838Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR, Boettcher SW, Mi Q, Santori EA, Lewis NS (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kudo A, Miseki Y (2009) Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 38:253–278Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunti S, Kumar A, Ram MK (2018) Nanostructured photocatalysis in the visible spectrum for the decontamination of air and water. Int Mater Rev 63:257–282Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eskandarloo H, Zaferani M, Kierulf A, Abbaspourrad A (2018) Shape-controlled fabrication of TiO2 hollow shells toward photocatalytic application. Appl Catal B 227:519–529Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reti B, Kiss GI, Gyulavari T, Baan K, Magyari K, Hernadi K (2017) Carbon sphere templates for TiO2 hollow structures: preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity. Catal Today 284:160–168Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang R, Lan K, Liu B, Yu Y, Chen A, Li W (2019) Confinement synthesis of hierarchical ordered macro-/mesoporous TiO2 nanostructures with high crystallization for photodegradation. Chem Phys 516:48–54Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pingmuang K, Chen J, Kangwansupamonkon W, Wallace GG, Phanichphant S, Nattestad A (2017) Composite photocatalysts containing BiVO4 for degradation of cationic dyes. Sci Rep 7:8929–8936Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Y, Tan G, Ren H, Xia A, Li B, Zhang D, Wang M, Lv L (2018) Synthesis of BiVO4 with surface heterojunction for enhancing photocatalytic activity by low temperature aqueous method. Mater Lett 229:308–311Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiong LB, Yu HQ, Nie CJ, Xiao YJ, Zeng QD, Wang GJ, Wang BY, Lv H, Li QG, Chen SS (2017) Size-controlled synthesis of Cu2O nanoparticles: size effect on antibacterial activity and application as a photocatalyst for highly efficient H2O2 evolution. RSC Adv 7:51822–51830Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dan Z, Yang Y, Qin F, Wang H, Chang H (2018) Facile fabrication of Cu2O nanobelts in ethanol on nanoporous Cu and their photodegradation of methyl orange. Materials (Basel) 11:446–460Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen D, Ye J (2008) Hierarchical WO3 hollow shells: dendrite, sphere, dumbbell, and their photocatalytic properties. Adv Funct Mater 18:1922–1928Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jin B, Jung E, Ma M, Kim S, Zhang K, Kim JI, Son Y, Park JH (2018) Solution-processed yolk-shell-shaped WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction photoelectrodes for efficient solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A 6:2585–2592Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ramirez-Canon A, Medina-Llamas M, Vezzoli M, Mattia D (2018) Multiscale design of ZnO nanostructured photocatalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:6648–6656Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suryavanshi RD, Mohite SV, Bagade AA, Shaikh SK, Thorat JB, Rajpure KY (2018) Nanocrystalline immobilised ZnO photocatalyst for degradation of benzoic acid and methyl blue dye. Mater Res Bull 101:324–333Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sohn Y, Huang W, Taghipour F (2017) Recent progress and perspectives in the photocatalytic CO2 reduction of Ti-oxide-based nanomaterials. Appl Surf Sci 396:1696–1711Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu HZ, Jiang W, Yin L, Shi YS, Chen BD, Jiang WT, Ding YC (2016) Enhanced photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells with TiO2 micro/nano-structures as light scattering layer. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:5452–5461.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-4449-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng YL, Shen XJ, Wang LZ, Tian BZ, Liu YD, Chen HJ, Lei JY, Zhang JL (2017) Preparation of porous TiO2 photocatalyts with different crystal phases and high catalytic activity by simple calcination of titanate nanofibers. RSC Adv 7:45742–45745Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monfort O, Raptis D, Satrapinskyy L, Roch T, Plesch G, Lianos P (2017) Production of hydrogen by water splitting in a photoelectrochemical cell using a BiVO4/TiO2 layered photoanode. Electrochim Acta 251:244–249Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banerjee S, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2015) Self-cleaning applications of TiO2 by photo-induced hydrophilicity and photocatalysis. Appl Catal B 176:396–428Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun B, Zhou GW, Zhang Y, Liu RR, Li TD (2015) Photocatalytic properties of exposed crystal surface-controlled rutile TiO2 nanorod assembled microspheres. Chem Eng J 264:125–133Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ni J, Fu S, Yuan Y, Ma L, Jiang Y, Li L, Lu J (2018) Boosting sodium storage in TiO2 nanotube arrays through surface phosphorylation. Adv Mater 30:1704337–1704344Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhao L, Zhong C, Wang YL, Wang SM, Dong BH, Wan L (2015) Ag nanoparticle-decorated 3D flower-like TiO2 hierarchical microstructures composed of ultrathin nanosheets and enhanced photoelectrical conversion properties in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 292:49–57Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li H, Li T, Liu H, Huang B, Zhang Q (2016) Hierarchical flower-like nanostructures of anatase TiO2 nanosheets dominated by 001 facets. J Alloy Compd 657:1–7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu WB, Li X, Ruan ZH, Li YD, Xu XZ, Yuan Y, Lin KF (2018) Fabrication of a TiO2 trapped meso/macroporous g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalyst and understanding its enhanced photocatalytic activity based on optical simulation analysis. Inorg Chem Front 5:481–489Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu Y, Xu G, Lv H (2018) Ag modified Fe-doping TiO2 nanoparticles and nanowires with enhanced photocatalytic activities for hydrogen production and volatile organic pollutant degradation. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:10504–10516.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9115-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cho S, Ahn C, Park J, Jeon S (2018) 3D nanostructured N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts with enhanced visible absorption. Nanoscale 10:9747–9751Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hu Y, Chen W, Fu J, Ba M, Sun F, Zhang P, Zou J (2018) Hydrothermal synthesis of BiVO4/TiO2 composites and their application for degradation of gaseous benzene under visible light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 436:319–326Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ren B, Wang T, Qu G, Deng F, Liang D, Yang W, Liu M (2018) In situ synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterojunction nanocomposites as a highly active photocatalyst for the degradation of Orange II under visible light irradiation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:19122–19133Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu C, He Y, Wei L, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Hong J, Chen S, Wang L, Li J (2018) Hydrothermal carbon coated TiO2 as support for Co-based catalyst in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal 8:1591–1600Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang X, Wang F, Bo C, Cheng K, Wang J, Zhang J, Song H (2018) Promotion of phenol photodecomposition and the corresponding decomposition mechanism over g-C3N4/TiO2 nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 453:320–329Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li WJ, Wang Z, Kong DF, Du DD, Zhou M, Du Y, Yan TJ, You JM, Kong DS (2016) Visible-light-induced dendritic BiVO4/TiO2 composite photocatalysts for advanced oxidation process. J Alloy Compd 688:703–711Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun B, Zhou W, Li H, Ren L, Qiao P, Xiao F, Wang L, Jiang B, Fu H (2018) Magnetic Fe2O3/mesoporous black TiO2 hollow sphere heterojunctions with wide-spectrum response and magnetic separation. Appl Catal B 221:235–242Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tong Z, Yang D, Xiao T, Tian Y, Jiang Z (2015) Biomimetic fabrication of g-C3N4/TiO2 nanosheets with enhanced photocatalytic activity toward organic pollutant degradation. Chem Eng J 260:117–125Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sudhaik A, Raizada P, Shandilya P, Jeong D-Y, Lim J-H, Singh P (2018) Review on fabrication of graphitic carbon nitride based efficient nanocomposites for photodegradation of aqueous phase organic pollutants. J Ind Eng Chem 67:28–51Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cao S, Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M (2015) Polymeric photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride. Adv Mater 27:2150–2176Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Panneri S, Ganguly P, Nair BN, Mohamed AA, Warrier KG, Hareesh UN (2017) Role of precursors on the photophysical properties of carbon nitride and its application for antibiotic degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:8609–8618Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Y, Yang W, Chen X, Wang J, Zhu Y (2018) Photocatalytic activity enhancement of core-shell structure g-C3N4@TiO2 via controlled ultrathin g-C3N4 layer. Appl Catal B 220:337–347Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tang Q, Meng XF, Wang ZY, Zhou JW, Tang H (2018) One-step electrospinning synthesis of TiO2/g-C3N4 nanofibers with enhanced photocatalytic properties. Appl Surf Sci 430:253–262Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhou C, Ye NF, Yan XH, Wang JJ, Pan JM, Wang DF, Wang Q, Zu JX, Cheng XN (2018) Construction of hybrid Z-scheme graphitic C3N4/reduced TiO2 microsphere with visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. J Mater 4:238–246Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hu CY, E L, Zhao D, Hu KK, Cui J, Xiong QM, Liu ZF (2018) Controllable synthesis and formation mechanism of 3D flower-like TiO2 microspheres. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:10277–10283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9081-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Li W, Geng X, Xiao F, An G, Wang D (2017) Fe(II)/Fe(III) doped Bi/BiOBr hierarchical microspheres as a highly efficient catalyst for degradation of organic contaminants at neutral pH: the role of visible light and H2O2. ChemCatChem 9:3762–3771Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jo W-K, Natarajan TS (2015) Influence of TiO2 morphology on the photocatalytic efficiency of direct Z-scheme g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts for isoniazid degradation. Chem Eng J 281:549–565Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Peng J, Zhao Y, Ul Hassan Q, Li H, Liu Y, Ma S, Mao D, Li H, Meng L, Hojamberdiev M (2018) Rapid microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis and visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of Er3+-doped BiOI nanosheets. Adv Powder Technol 29:1158–1166Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang X, Maeda K, Thomas A, Takanabe K, Xin G, Carlsson JM, Domen K, Antonietti M (2009) A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat Mater 8:76–80Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tan Y, Shu Z, Zhou J, Li T, Wang W, Zhao Z (2018) One-step synthesis of nanostructured g-C3N4/TiO2 composite for highly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Catal B 230:260–268Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yang G, Jiang Z, Shi H, Xiao T, Yan Z (2010) Preparation of highly visible-light active N-doped TiO2 photocatalyst. J Mater Chem 20:5301–5309Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Song X, Hu Y, Zheng MM, Wei CH (2016) Solvent-free in situ synthesis of g-C3N4/{001}TiO2 composite with enhanced UV- and visible-light photocatalytic activity for NO oxidation. Appl Catal B 182:587–597Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lu Z, Zeng L, Song W, Qin Z, Zeng D, Xie C (2017) In situ synthesis of C-TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposite as highly visible light active photocatalyst originated from effective interfacial charge transfer. Appl Catal B 202:489–499Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wei H, McMaster WA, Tan JZY, Chen D, Caruso RA (2018) Tricomponent brookite/anatase TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction in mesoporous hollow microspheres for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 6:7236–7245Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hao R, Wang G, Jiang C, Tang H, Xu Q (2017) In situ hydrothermal synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterojunction photocatalysts with high specific surface area for Rhodamine B degradation. Appl Surf Sci 411:400–410Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Qiu PX, Xu CM, Chen H, Jiang F, Wang X, Lu RF, Zhang XR (2017) One step synthesis of oxygen doped porous graphitic carbon nitride with remarkable improvement of photo-oxidation activity: role of oxygen on visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B 206:319–327Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wu D, Li J, Guan J, Liu C, Zhao X, Zhu Z, Ma C, Huo P, Li C, Yan Y (2018) Improved photoelectric performance via fabricated heterojunction g-C3N4/TiO2/HNTs loaded photocatalysts for photodegradation of ciprofloxacin. J Ind Eng Chem 64:206–218Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zang M, Shi L, Liang L, Li D, Sun J (2015) Heterostructured g-C3N4/Ag-TiO2 composites with efficient photocatalytic performance under visible-light irradiation. RSC Adv 5:56136–56144Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Raizada P, Singh P, Kumar A, Sharma G, Pare B, Jonnalagadda SB, Thakur P (2014) Solar photocatalytic activity of nano-ZnO supported on activated carbon or brick grain particles: Role of adsorption in dye degradation. Appl Catal A 486:159–169Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang Y, Deng B, Zhang T, Gao D, Xu A-W (2010) Shape effects of Cu2O polyhedral microcrystals on photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 114:5073–5079Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Abazari R, Mahjoub AR, Shariati J, Noruzi S (2019) Photocatalytic wastewater purification under visible light irradiation using bismuth molybdate hollow microspheres with high surface area. J Clean Prod 221:582–586Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang B, Wang Q, Zhuang J, Guan S, Li B (2018) Molten salt assisted in situ synthesis of TiO2/g-C3N4 composites with enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity and adsorption ability. J Photoch Photobio A 362:1–13Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang G, Zhang T, Li B, Jiang S, Zhang X, Hai L, Chen X, Wu W (2018) An ingenious strategy of preparing TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalyst: In situ growth of TiO2 nanocrystals on g-C3N4 nanosheets via impregnation-calcination method. Appl Surf Sci 433:963–974Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chen D, Niu F, Qin L, Wang S, Zhang N, Huang Y (2017) Defective BiFeO3 with surface oxygen vacancies: Facile synthesis and mechanism insight into photocatalytic performance. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 171:24–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringTianjin Chengjian UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Building Green Functional MaterialsTianjin Chengjian UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations