Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 545–564 | Cite as

Synthesis and optimisation of a novel graphene wool material by atmospheric pressure chemical vapour deposition

  • Genna-Leigh Schoonraad
  • Moshawe Jack Madito
  • Ncholu Manyala
  • Patricia ForbesEmail author
Chemical routes to materials
  • 209 Downloads

Abstract

A novel graphene wool material was synthesised by non-catalytic chemical vapour deposition using a high-purity quartz wool substrate. The in situ synthesis method avoids post-growth transfer and isolation steps and allows the graphene to be directly synthesised into graphene wool. In the absence of a catalyst during graphene growth, the cracking of methane and nucleation is not as efficient, resulting in graphene defects which can be minimised by optimising the growth conditions. The roles of the methane and hydrogen flow rates in the synthesis of the graphene wool were investigated, as was the effect of growth temperature, growth time and cooling rates. The precursor flow rates and growth temperature were found to be the most vital parameters. The best quality graphene wool showed a minimum ratio of the disordered carbon relative to the graphitic carbon (ID/IG ≈ 0.8) with a calculated crystallite grain size of 24 nm. The morphology of the optimised graphene wool was flake-like, and the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed a surface composition of 94.05 at.% C 1s and 5.95 at.% O 1s. With this new material, the integrity of the synthesised graphene surface is preserved in use and it has the added advantage of structural support from the quartz substrate. Unlike many other forms of graphene, this fibrous graphene wool is flexible, malleable and compressible, allowing for a wealth of potential applications including in electronics, energy storage, catalysis, and gas sorption, storage, separation and sensing applications.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Departments of Chemistry and Physics at the University of Pretoria as well as Impala Platinum Ltd are duly acknowledged for their support and resources as well as the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No. 61056).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen J, Wen Y, Guo Y, Wu B, Huang L, Xue Y, Geng D, Wang D, Yu G, Liu Y (2011) Oxygen-aided synthesis of polycrystalline graphene on silicon dioxide substrates. J Am Chem Soc 133(44):17548–17551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S (2011) Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci 56(8):1178–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang G, Guo X, Wang S, Wang X, Zhou Y, Xu H (2014) New graphene fiber coating for volatile organic compounds analysis. J Chromatogr B 969:128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Z, Guo X, Zhu L, Li L, Liu Y, Zhao L, Zhang W, Chen J, Zhang Y, Zhao Y (2018) Direct growth of graphene on vertically standing glass by a metal-free chemical vapor deposition method. J Mater Sci Technol 34(10):1919–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu S, Man B, Jiang S, Yue W, Yang C, Liu M, Chen C, Zhang C (2014) Direct growth of graphene on quartz substrates for label-free detection of adenosine triphosphate. Nanotechnology 25(16):165702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu Z, Zhu H, Xu Z, Xie D, Fang Y (eds) (2018) Fundamental properties of graphene. In: Graphene. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 73–102Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aoki H, Dresselhaus MS (2014) Physics of graphene, 1st edn. Springer, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442(7100):282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M (2008) Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol 3(5):270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramanathan T, Abdala AA, Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Herrera-Alonso M, Piner RD, Adamson DH, Schniepp HC, Chen X, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST, Aksay IA, Prud’Homme RK, Brinson LC (2008) Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nat Nanotechnol 3(6):327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He Y, Liu Y, Wu T, Ma J, Wang X, Gong Q, Kong W, Xing F, Gao J (2013) An environmentally friendly method for the fabrication of reduced graphene oxide foam with a super oil absorption capacity. J Hazard Mater 260:796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu S, Kong L, Liu J (2016) Removal of mercury and fluoride from aqueous solutions by three-dimensional reduced-graphene oxide aerogel. Res Chem Intermed 42(5):4513–4530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yousefi N, Lu X, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2019) Environmental performance of graphene-based 3D macrostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 14(2):107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi J, Wang Y, Du W, Hou Z (2016) Synthesis of graphene encapsulated Fe3C in carbon nanotubes from biomass and its catalysis application. Carbon 99:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vaziri S, Lupina G, Henkel C, Smith AD, Ostling M, Dabrowski J, Lippert G, Mehr W, Lemme MC (2013) A graphene-based hot electron transistor. Nano Lett 13(4):1435–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganesan A, Shaijumon MM (2016) Activated graphene-derived porous carbon with exceptional gas adsorption properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 220:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar R, Suresh VM, Maji TK, Rao CN (2014) Porous graphene frameworks pillared by organic linkers with tunable surface area and gas storage properties. Chem Commun (Camb) 50(16):2015–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nidheesh PV (2017) Graphene-based materials supported advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(35):27047–27069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pang S, Englert JM, Tsao HN, Hernandez Y, Hirsch A, Feng X, Müllen K (2010) Extrinsic corrugation-assisted mechanical exfoliation of monolayer graphene. Adv Mater 22(47):5374–5377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yi M, Shen Z (2015) A review on mechanical exfoliation for the scalable production of graphene. J Mater Chem A 3(22):11700–11715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50(9):3210–3228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saleem H, Haneef M, Abbasi HY (2018) Synthesis route of reduced graphene oxide via thermal reduction of chemically exfoliated graphene oxide. Mater Chem Phys 204:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poon SW, Chen W, Tok ES, Wee ATS (2008) Probing epitaxial growth of graphene on silicon carbide by metal decoration. Appl Phys Lett 92(10):104102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mishra N, Boeckl J, Motta N, Iacopi F (2016) Graphene growth on silicon carbide: a review graphene growth on silicon carbide. Physica Status Solidi (a) 213(9):2277–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao L, Guest JR, Guisinger NP (2010) Epitaxial graphene on Cu(111). Nano Lett 10(9):3512–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen H, Zhu W, Zhang Z (2010) Contrasting behavior of carbon nucleation in the initial stages of graphene epitaxial growth on stepped metal surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 104(18):186101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li X, Cai W, An J, Yang D, Piner R, Velamakanni A, Jung I, Ruoff RS, Kim S, Nah J, Tutuc E, Banerjee SK, Colombo L (2009) Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324(5932):1312–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xue Y, Wu B, Guo Y, Huang L, Jiang L, Chen J, Geng D, Liu Y, Hu W, Yu G (2011) Synthesis of large-area, few-layer graphene on iron foil by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Res 4(12):1208–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jung DH, Kang C, Kim M, Cheong H, Lee H, Lee JS (2014) Effects of hydrogen partial pressure in the annealing process on graphene growth. J Phys Chem C 118(7):3574–3580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vlassiouk I, Smirnov S, Regmi M, Surwade SP, Srivastava N, Feenstra R, Eres G, Parish C, Lavrik N, Datskos P, Dai S, Fulvio P (2013) Graphene nucleation density on copper: fundamental role of background pressure. J Phys Chem C 117(37):18919–18926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cole MT, Lindvall N, Yurgens A (2012) Noncatalytic chemical vapor deposition of graphene on high-temperature substrates for transparent electrodes. Appl Phys Lett 100(2):022102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tai L, Zhu D, Liu X, Yang T, Wang L, Wang R, Jiang S, Chen Z, Xu Z, Li X (2018) Direct growth of graphene on silicon by metal-free chemical vapor deposition. Nano-Micro Lett 10(2):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Han W, Zettl A (2002) An efficient route to graphitic carbon-layer-coated gallium nitride nanorods. Adv Mater 14(21):1560–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ding X, Ding G, Xie X, Huang F, Jiang M (2011) Direct growth of few layer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride by chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 49(7):2522–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guermoune A, Chari T, Popescu F, Sabri SS, Guillemette J, Skulason HS, Szkopek T, Siaj M (2011) Chemical vapor deposition synthesis of graphene on copper with methanol, ethanol, and propanol precursors. Carbon 49(13):4204–4210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reina A, Thiele S, Jia X, Bhaviripudi S, Dresselhaus MS, Schaefer JA, Kong J (2009) Growth of large-area single- and bi-layer graphene by controlled carbon precipitation on polycrystalline Ni surfaces. Nano Res 2(6):509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kwon SY, Ciobanu CV, Petrova V, Shenoy VB, Bareño J, Gambin V, Petrov I, Kodambaka S (2009) Growth of semiconducting graphene on palladium. Nano Lett 9(12):3985–3990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Imamura G, Saiki K (2011) Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene on Pt(111) by chemical vapor deposition. J Phys Chem C 115(20):10000–10005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen S, Cai W, Piner RD, Suk JW, Wu Y, Ren Y, Kang J, Ruoff RS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of large-area graphene and graphite films on commercial Cu–Ni alloy foils. Nano Lett 11(9):3519–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hwang J, Kim M, Cha H-Y, Spencer M, Lee J-W (2014) Metal free growth of graphene on quartz substrate using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14(4):2979–2983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schoonraad G, Forbes PBC (2019) System and method for manufacturing graphene wool, South Africa. Patent no: 2019/00675Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schoonraad G, Forbes PBC (2019) Air pollutant trap. Patent no: 2019/00674Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kozlov GI, Knorre VG (1962) Single-pulse shock tube studies on the kinetics of the thermal decomposition of methane. Combust Flame 6:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hermann J, DiStasio RA Jr, Tkatchenko A (2017) First-principles models for van der Waals interactions in molecules and materials: concepts, theory, and applications. Chem Rev 117(6):4714–4758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ndiaye NM, Ngom BD, Sylla NF, Masikhwa TM, Madito MJ, Momodu D, Ntsoane T, Manyala N (2018) Three dimensional vanadium pentoxide/graphene foam composite as positive electrode for high performance asymmetric electrochemical supercapacitor. J Colloid Interface Sci 532:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shin YC, Kong J (2013) Hydrogen-excluded graphene synthesis via atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 59:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chen J, Li C, Ristovski Z, Milic A, Gu Y, Islam MS, Wang S, Hao J, Zhang H, He C (2017) A review of biomass burning: emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Sci Total Environ 579:1000–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cançado LG, Takai K, Enoki T, Endo M, Kim YA, Mizusaki H, Jorio A, Coelho LN, Magalhães-Paniago R, Pimenta MA (2006) General equation for the determination of the crystallite size of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 88(16):163106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen J, Guo Y, Wen Y, Huang L, Xue Y, Geng D, Wu B, Luo B, Yu G, Liu Y (2013) Two-stage metal-catalyst-free growth of high-quality polycrystalline graphene films on silicon nitride substrates. Adv Mater 25(7):992–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sun J, Gao T, Song X, Zhao Y, Lin Y, Wang H, Ma D, Chen Y, Xiang W, Wang J, Zhang Y, Liu Z (2014) Direct growth of high-quality graphene on high-κ dielectric SrTiO3 substrates. J Am Chem Soc 136(18):6574–6577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Butenko YV, Krishnamurthy S, Chakraborty AK, Kuznetsov VL, Dhanak VR, Hunt MRC, Šiller L (2005) Photoemission study of onionlike carbons produced by annealing nanodiamonds. Phys Rev B 71(7):075420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hsiao M-C, Liao S-H, Yen M-Y, Teng C-C, Lee S-H, Pu N-W, Wang C-A, Sung Y, Ger M-D, Ma C-CM, Hsiao M-H (2010) Preparation and properties of a graphene reinforced nanocomposite conducting plate. J Mater Chem 20(39):8496–8505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ogawa S, Yamada T, Ishidzuka S, Yoshigoe A, Hasegawa M, Teraoka Y, Takakuwa Y (2013) Graphene growth and carbon diffusion process during vacuum heating on Cu(111)/Al2O3 substrates. Jpn J Appl Phys 52(11R):110122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Processing LaboratoryImpala Platinum LtdRustenburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Physics, Institute of Applied MaterialsUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations