Advertisement

A facile strategy toward hydrophobic–oleophilic 3D Fe foam for efficient oil–water separation

  • Rui Zhang
  • Yuanpeng WuEmail author
  • Haiyan Zhang
  • Shishan Xue
  • Meiling Guo
  • Tao ZhangEmail author
Metals & corrosion
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, we present a hydrophobic–oleophilic Fe foam for oil–water separation. Hydrophobic–oleophilic Fe foam was fabricated simply through dip-coating with n-dodecyl mercaptan. The morphology, chemical composition and water contact angle of the Fe foam were characterized. The Fe foam could absorb a variety of oils, such as diesel, toluene, xylene, cyclohexane, dodecyl methacrylate, crude oil, 1,2-dichloroethane, hexane and chloroform, these oils could be underwater or on water surface, and it exhibited excellent durability, verified by the high separation efficiency (more than 98.8% for a cyclohexane–water mixture) after reusing for 48 times. Furthermore, oil collection with the Fe foam could be controlled remotely using external magnetic field, and the Fe foam displayed high flux, good anti-corrosion and wear resistance. The simple and low-cost fabrication method enabled the Fe foam to be a promising candidate for large-scale oil–water separation and for remotely controllable water purification.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control (PPC2017008), Open Funds of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (PLN1201, SWPU), Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2018GZYZF0073), Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (161103), International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Chengdu (2017-GH02-00005-HZ), Natural Science Foundation of Nanchong City (NC17SY4015) and Innovative Research Team of Southwest Petroleum University (2017CXTD01).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3819_MOESM1_ESM.docx (68 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 67 kb)
Video S1

An impacting water column ejected from a pipette and bouncing off the sample. (MP4 5496 kb)

10853_2019_3819_MOESM3_ESM.mp4 (4.1 mb)
Video S2 Adsorption process of hexane controlled by magnet. (MP4 4234 kb)
Video S3

The continuous separation of oil from oil–water mixtures with Fe-NDM. (MP4 5006 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yan L, Tas S, Zhang KH, Vos WN, Ma JH, Vancso GJ (2018) Thermoresponsive membranes from electrospun mats with switchable wettability for efficient oil/water separations. Macromolecules 51:8435–8442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wu YP, Zhou CL, Guo LJ, Yang H, Lin YH, Zheng ZH, Ding XB (2016) Preparation and oil absorption of magnetically carbonized foams based on waste polyurethane foams. Acta Polymer Sin 4:402–408Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang QY, Li Q, Akram YM, Ali S, Jun Nie, Zhu XQ (2018) Decomposable polyvinyl alcohol-based super-hydrophobic three dimensional porous material for effective water/oil separation. Langmuir 34:15700–15707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang YQ, Yang XB, Wang ZX, Long J, Shao L (2017) Designing multifunctional 3D magnetic foam for effective insoluble oil separation and rapid selective dye removal for use in wastewater remediation. J Mater Chem A 5:7316–7325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu YP, Zhou CL, Xue SS, Li C, Lin YH, Zheng ZH, Ding XB (2017) Preparation and oil absorption of magnetic and porous materials based on carboxymethyl cellulose sodium modified polyurethane foams. Acta Polymer Sin 3:516–523Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang CF, Wang WN, Kuo SW, Chiang WY, Hung JH, Lee KJ (2018) Biocompatible meshes with appropriate wettabilities for under water oil tansportation/collection and highly effective oil/water separation. Langmuir 34:11442–11448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu YP, Zhang T, Xu ZG, Guo QP (2015) High internal phase emulsion (HIPE) xerogels for enhanced oil spill recovery. J Mater Chem A 3:1906–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yin K, Chu DK, Dong XR, Wang C, Duan JA, He J (2017) Femtosecond laser induced robust periodic nanoripple structured mesh for highly efficient oil–water separation. Nanoscale 9:14229–14235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Song JL, Lu Y, Luo J, Huang S, Wang L, Xu WJ, Parkin IP (2015) Barrel-shaped oil skimmer designed for collection of oil from spills. Adv Mater Interfaces 2:1500350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma QL, Cheng HF, Fane AG, Wang R, Zhang H (2016) Recent development of advanced materials with special wettability for selective oil/water separation. Small 16:2186–2202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu YP, Xue SS, Yang H, Zhang HY, Zhang T, Gou SH (2017) Polymerization-induced phase separation for the fabrication of magnetic sponges for oil spill reclamation. Chem Eng J 328:639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kleindient S, Paul JH, Joye SB (2015) Using dispersants after oil spills: impacts on the composition and activity of microbial communities. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu YP, Yang H, Zhu SG, Lin YH, Zheng ZH, Ding XB (2016) Magnetic responsive oil-absorbing polymeric resins based on 4-tert-butyl-styrene and methyl methacrylate. Acta Polymer Sin 11:1599–1605Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li J, Xu CC, Zhang Y, Wang RF, Zha F, She HD (2016) Robust superhydrophobic attapulgite coated polyurethane sponge for efficient immiscible oil/water mixture and emulsion separation. J Mater Chem A 4:15546–15553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiao CM, Si LX, Liu YM, Guan GQ, Wu DH, Wang ZD, Hao XG (2016) Ultrastable coaxial cable-like superhydrophobic mesh with self-adaption effect: facile synthesis and oil/water separation application. J Mater Chem A 4:8080–8090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee YS, Kaang BK, Han N, Lee HJ, Liu YN, Choi WS (2018) An anti-overturn Janus sponge with excellent floating stability for simultaneous pollutant remediation and oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 6:16371–16381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rather AM, Shome A, Kumar S, Bhunia BK, Mandal BB, Srivatava HK, Manna U (2018) Alkali metal-ion assisted Michael addition reaction in controlled tailoring of topography in a superhydrophobic polymeric monolith. J Mater Chem A 6:17019–17031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shome A, Rather AM, Manna U (2018) Aloe vera mucilage derived highly tolerant underwater superoleophobic coatings. J Mater Chem A 6:22465–22471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang XB, Sun HG, Pal A, Bai YP, Shao L (2018) Biomimetic silicification on membrane surface for highly efficient treatments of both oil-in-water emulsion and protein wastewater. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:29982–29991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheng L, Wang DM, Shaikh AR, Fang LF, Jeon S, Saeki D, Lei Z, Liu CJ, Matsuyama H (2018) Dual superlyophobic aliphatic polyketone membranes for highly efficient emulsified oil–water separation: performance and mechanism. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:30860–30870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao SJ, Zhu YZ, Wang JL, Zhang F, Li JY, Jin J (2018) Layer-by-layer construction of Cu2+/alginate multilayer modified ultrafiltration membrane with bioinspired superwetting property for high-efficient crude-oil-in-water emulsion separation. Adv Func Mater 28:1801944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tian XL, Jin H, Sainio J, Robin HA, Ikkala O (2014) Droplet and fluid gating by biomimetic Janus membranes. Adv Func Mater 24:6023–6028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang ZD, Xiao CM, Wu ZJ, Wang YT, Du X, Kong W, Pan DH, Guan GQ, Hao XG (2017) A novel 3D porous modified material with cage-like structure: fabrication and its demulsification effect for efficient oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 5:5895–5904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang T, Guo QP (2017) Continuous preparation of polyHIPE monoliths from ionomer-stabilized high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs) for efficient recovery of spilled oils. Chem Eng J 307:812–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun HY, Xu Z, Gao C (2013) Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv Mater 25:2554–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zeng XJ, Qian L, Yuan XX, Zhou CL, Li ZW, Cheng J, Xu SP, Wang SF, Pi PH, Wen XF (2017) Inspired by stenocara beetles: form water collection to high-efficiency water-in-oil emulsion separation. ACS Nano 11:760–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang ZX, Jiang Xu, Cheng XQ, Lau CH, Shao L (2015) Mussel-inspired hybrid coatings that transform membrane hydrophobicity into high hydrophilicity and underwater superoleophobicity for oil-in-water emulsion separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:9534–9545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiao M, Kong T, Wang W, Song Q, Zhang D, Ma QQ, Cheng GS (2015) Interconnected graphene network with uniform geometry for flexible conductors. Adv Func Mater 25:6165–6172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun HG, Zhang YQ, Sadam H, Ma J, Bai YP, Shen X, Kim JK, Shao L (2019) Novel mussel-inspired zwitterionic hydrophilic polymer to boost membrane water-treatment performance. J Membr Sci 582:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhou W, Li GJ, Wang LY, Chen ZF, Lin YL (2017) A facile method for the fabrication of superhydrophobic polydopamine-coated copper foam for oil/water separation. Appl Surf Sci 413:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu Y, Zhan B, Zhang KT, Kaya C, Stegmaier T, Han ZW (2018) On-demand oil/water separation of 3D Fe foam by controllable wettability. Chem Eng J 331:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou WT, Li S, Liu Y, Xu ZZ, Wei SF, Wang GY, Lian JS, Jiang Q (2018) Dual superlyophobic copper foam with good durability and recyclability for high flux, high efficiency, and continuous oil–water separation. ACS Mater Interfaces 10:9841–9848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Luo ZY, Chen KX, Wang JH, Mo DC, Lyu SS (2016) Hierarchical nanoparticle-induced superhydrophilic and under-water superoleophobic Cu foam with ultrahigh water permeability for effective oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 4:10566–10574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang YB, Lin F, Peng JY, Dong YP, Li W, Huang YD (2016) A robust bilayer nanofilm fabricated on copper foam for oil–water separation with improved performances. J Mater Chem A 4:10294–10303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhou QQ, Yan BB, Xing TL, Chen GQ (2019) Fabrication of superhydrophobic caffeic acid/Fe@cotton fabric and its oil–water separation performance. Carbohyd Polym 203:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yuan SS, Zhu JY, Li Y, Zhao Y, Li J, Peter VP, Bart VB (2019) Structure architecture of micro/nanoscale ZIF-L on a 3D printed membrane for a superhydrophobic and underwater superoleophobic surface. J Mater Chem A 7:2723–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cai YH, Chen DY, Li NJ, Xu QF, Li H, He JH, Lu JM (2019) Self-healing and superwettable nanofibrous membranes for efficient separation of oil-in-water emulsions. J Mater Chem A 7:1629–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang XB, Yan LL, Ran FT, Pal A, Long J, Shao L (2019) Interface-confined surface engineering constructing water-unidirectional Janus membrane. J Membr Sci 576:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yu LS, Kang YH, Tang HD, Zhou JP (2019) Functionalization of commercial sand core funnels as hydrophobic materials with novel physicochemical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:7510–7521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Obaid M, Tolba GMK, Motlak M, Fadali OA, Khalil KA, Almajid AA, Kim B, Barakat NAM (2015) Effective polysulfone-amorphous SiO2 NPs electrospun nanofiber membrane for high flux oil/water separation. Chem Eng J 279:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Material Science and EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.College of Textile and Clothing EngineeringSoochow UniversitySuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations