Advertisement

Hydrothermal synthesis of a graphene/magnetite/montmorillonite nanocomposite and its ultrasonically assisted methylene blue adsorption

  • Bo Zhang
  • Tailiang ZhangEmail author
  • Zhidong Zhang
  • Mingyuan Xie
Chemical routes to materials
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

A graphene/magnetite/montmorillonite nanocomposite (GQDs/Fe3O4/MMT) was synthesized via a simple green hydrothermal method. The effects of pH, temperature, contact time, adsorbent quality, dye concentration and ultrasonication on the adsorption performance of methylene blue (MB) were investigated. For ultrasonic-assisted adsorption, the adsorption rate of GQDs/Fe3O4/MMT can reach 10 s. Ultrasound strongly affected the adsorption equilibrium time but did not affect the maximum adsorption capacity. The main reason for ultrasonic-assisted dyes ultrafast adsorption is cavitation that graphene quantum dots (GQDs) promote nucleation. By adjusting the amount of surface charge, the adsorbent has excellent selective ultrasonic-assisted ultrafast adsorption properties of mixed dyes. The adsorption performance of the GQDs/Fe3O4/MMT was weakly affected by temperature. The theoretical and experimental maximum adsorption capacities were 429.4 mg/g and 225.0 mg/g, respectively. The adsorption kinetics and adsorption isotherms agree well with the pseudo-second-order equation and the Langmuir equation, respectively. After six adsorption/desorption cycles, the adsorption and desorption efficiency of the dye decreased slightly. The results indicated that the GQDs/Fe3O4/MMT nanosorbent has strong potential for removing the cationic dye MB from wastewater.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Southwest Petroleum University in China.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3659_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1163 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Banerjee S, Benjwal P, Singh M, Kar KK (2018) Graphene oxide (rGO)-metal oxide (TiO2/Fe3O4) based nanocomposites for the removal of methylene blue. Appl Surf Sci 439:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Z, Sun Y, Xing J, Xing Y, Meng A (2018) One step synthesis of Co/Cr-codoped ZnO nanoparticle with superb adsorption properties for various anionic organic pollutants and its regeneration. J Hazard Mater 352:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mirzaei A, Chen Z, Haghighat F, Yerushalmi L (2017) Enhanced adsorption of anionic dyes by surface fluorination of zinc oxide: a straightforward method for numerical solving of the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST). Chem Eng J 330:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duman O, Tunç S, Polat TG, Bozoğlan BK (2016) Synthesis of magnetic oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube-κ-carrageenan-Fe3O4 nanocomposite adsorbent and its application in cationic methylene blue dye adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 147:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang YR, Wang SQ, Shen SL, Zhao BX (2013) A novel water treatment magnetic nanomaterial for removal of anionic and cationic dyes under severe condition. Chem Eng J 233:258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao R, Wang Y, Li X, Sun B, Wang C (2015) Synthesis of β-cyclodextrin-based electrospun nanofiber membranes for highly efficient adsorption and separation of methylene blue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26649–26657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao F, Liu L, Yang F, Ren N (2013) E-Fenton degradation of MB during filtration with Gr/PPy modified membrane cathode. Chem Eng J 230:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu RF, Lin CH, Chen HW, Cheng WP, Kao MC (2013) Possible control approaches of the Electro-Fenton process for textile wastewater treatment using on-line monitoring of DO and ORP. Chem Eng J 218:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yao J, Li L, Li P, Yang M (2017) Quantum dots: from fluorescence to chemiluminescence, bioluminescence, electrochemiluminescence, and electrochemistry. Nanoscale 9:l13364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li LL, Ji J, Fei R, Wang CZ, Lu Q, Zhang JR, Jiang LP, Zhu JJ (2012) A facile microwave avenue to electrochemiluminescent two-color graphene quantum dots. Adv Funct Mater 22:2971–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li L, Wu G, Yang G, Peng J, Zhao J, Zhu JJ (2013) Focusing on luminescent graphene quantum dots: current status and future perspectives. Nanoscale 5:4015–4039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dong Y, Chen JC, Li HR, Wang Y, Chi X, Gchen L (2012) Blue luminescent graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide prepared by tuning the carbonization degree of citric acid. Carbon 50:4738–4743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henry B (2014) Preparation and characterization of graphene quantum dots-Fe3O4 nanocomposite as an efficient adsorbent in magnetic solid phase extraction: application to determination of Bisphenol A in water samples. Anal Methods 6:8413–8419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shi B, Su Y, Zhang L, Huang M, Li X, Zhao S (2016) Facilely prepared Fe3O4/nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dot hybrids as a robust nonenzymatic catalyst for visual discrimination of phenylenediamine isomers. Nanoscale 8:10814–10822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yao Q, Wang S, Shi WY, Lu C, Liu G (2017) Graphene quantum dots in two dimensional confined and hydrophobic space for enhanced adsorption of nonionic organic adsorbates. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sani HA, Ahmad MB, Hussein MZ, Ibrahim NA, Musa A, Saleh TA (2017) Nanocomposite of ZnO with montmorillonite for removal of lead and copper ions from aqueous solutions. Proc Safe Environ Prot 109:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang J, Ma J, Ma Q, Zhang D, Qiao N, Hu M, Ma H (2015) Adsorption of methylene blue onto Fe3O4/activated montmorillonite nanocomposite. Appl Clay Sci 119:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakandritsos A, Steriotis T, Petridis D (2004) High surface area montmorillonite—carbon composites and derived carbons. Chem Mater 16:1551–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mu B, Tang J, Zhang L, Wang A (2016) Preparation, characterization and application on dye adsorption of a well-defined two-dimensional superparamagnetic clay/polyaniline/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Appl Clay Sci 132–133:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Benítezmartínez S, Valcárcel M (2015) Fluorescent determination of graphene quantum dots in water samples. Anal Chim Acta 896:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sricharoen P, Limchoowong N, Areerob Y, Nuengmatcha PT, Echawongstien S, Chanthai S (2017) Fe3O4/hydroxyapatite/graphene quantum dots as a novel nano-sorbent for preconcentration of copper residue in Thai food ingredients: optimization of ultrasound-assisted magnetic solid phase extraction. Ultrason Sonochem 37:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou JB, Wu PX, Dang Z, Zhu NW, Li P, Wu JH, Wang XD (2010) Polymeric Fe/Zr pillared montmorillonite for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 162:1035–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu P, Dai Y, Long H, Zhu N, Li P, Wu J, Dang Z (2012) Characterization of organo-montmorillonites and comparison for Sr(II) removal: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Chem Eng J 191:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ryu J, Suh YW, Dong JS, Dong JA (2010) Hydrothermal preparation of carbon microspheres from mono-saccharides and phenolic compounds. Carbon 48:1990–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen Q, Wu Q (2015) Preparation of carbon microspheres decorated with silver nanoparticles and their ability to remove dyes from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 283:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baccile N, Laurent G, Babonneau F, Fayon F, Titirici MM, Antonietti M (2009) Structural characterization of hydrothermal carbon spheres by advanced solid-state MAS 13C NMR investigations. J Phys Chem C 113:9644–9654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fang C, Zhao E, Kim T, Wang J, Hableel G, Reardon PJT, Wang T, Knowles SJC (2017) Organosilica nanoparticles with an intrinsic secondary amine: an efficient and reusable adsorbent for dyes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:15566–15576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee SM, Tiwari D (2012) Organo and inorgano-organo-modified clays in the remediation of aqueous solutions: an overview. Appl Clay Sci 59–60:84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghaedi M, Hajjati S, Mahmudi Z, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Maity A, Gupta VK (2015) Modeling of competitive ultrasonic assisted removal of the dyes—methylene blue and safranin-O using Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 268:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alvand M, Shemirani F (2017) A Fe3O4@SiO2@graphene quantum dot core-shell structured nanomaterial as a fluorescent probe and for magnetic removal of mercury(II) ion. Microchim Acta 184:1621–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kang Z, Wang E, Mao B, Su Z, Chen L, Xu L (2005) Obtaining carbon nanotubes from grass. Nanotechnology 16:1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tang L, Ji R, Li X, Bai G, Liu CP, Hao J, Lin J, Jiang H, Teng KS, Yang Z (2014) Deep ultraviolet to near-infrared emission and photoresponse in layered N-doped graphene quantum dots. ACS Nano 8:6312–6320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhu S, Zhang J, Tang S, Qiao C, Wang L, Wang H, Liu X, Li B, Li Y, Yu W (2012) Surface chemistry routes to modulate the photoluminescence of graphene quantum dots: from fluorescence mechanism to up-conversion bioimaging applications. Adv Funct Mater 22:4732–4740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu J, Fu F, Ding Z, Na L, Bing T (2017) Removal mechanism of selenite by Fe3O4-precipitated mesoporous magnetic carbon microspheres. J Hazard Mater 330:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goworek J, Kierys A, Gac W, Borówka A, Kusak R (2009) Thermal degradation of CTAB in as-synthesized MCM-41. J Therm Anal Calorim 96:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng X, Dou J, Yuan J, Qin W, Hong X, Ding A (2017) Removal of Cs+ from water and soil by ammonium-pillared montmorillonite/Fe3O4 composite. J Environ Sci 56:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guo Y, Qian J, Iqbal A, Zhang L, Liu W, Qin W (2017) Pd nanoparticles immobilized on magnetic carbon dots@Fe3O4 nanocubes as a synergistic catalyst for hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:15167–15177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sitthichai S, Pilapong C, Thongtem T, Thongtem S (2015) CMC-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as new MRI probes for hepatocellular carcinoma. Appl Surf Sci 356:972–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lim SF, Zheng YM, Zou SW, Chen JP (2008) Characterization of copper adsorption onto an alginate encapsulated magnetic sorbent by a combined FT-IR, XPS, and mathematical modeling study. Environ Sci Technol 42:2551–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boruah PK, Sharma B, Karbhal I, Shelke MV, Das MR (2016) Ammonia-modified graphene sheets decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the photocatalytic and photo-Fenton degradation of phenolic compounds under sunlight irradiation. J Hazard Mater 325:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao C, Jiao Y, Hu F, Yang Y (2018) Green synthesis of carbon dots from pork and application as nanosensors for uric acid detection. Spectr Acta Part A Molec Spectr 190:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jia X, Dai R, Sun Y, Song H, Wu X (2016) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4/g-C3N4 nanocomposites with improved photocatalytic activities. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am4038307 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang H, Liang X, Yang C, Niu C, Wang J, Su X (2016) Nano γ-Fe2O3/bentonite magnetic composites: synthesis, characterization and application as adsorbents. J Alloys Compd 688:1019–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Song HJ, You S, Jia XH, Yang J (2015) MoS2 nanosheets decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their ultrafast adsorption for wastewater treatment. Ceram Int 41:13896–13902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silva MMF, Oliveira MM, Avelino MC, Fonseca MG, Almeida RKS, Filho ECS (2012) Adsorption of an industrial anionic dye by modified-KSF-montmorillonite: evaluation of the kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium data. Chem Eng J 203:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    He X, Male KB, Nesterenko PN, Brabazon D, Paull B, Luong JH (2013) Adsorption and desorption of methylene blue on porous carbon monoliths and nanocrystalline cellulose. Appl Mater Interface 5:8796–8804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mary EA, Saravanakumar MP (2018) Facile synthesis and characterisation of AlNs using protein rich solution extracted from sewage sludge and its application for ultrasonic assisted dye adsorption: isotherms, kinetics, mechanism and RSM design. J Environ Manag 206:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhou CJ, Wu QL, Lei TZ, Negulescu JI (2014) Adsorption kinetic and equilibrium studies for methylene blue dye by partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide/cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposite hydrogels. Chem Eng J 251:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ho YS, Mckay G (1998) Sorption of dye from aqueous solution by peat. Chem Eng J 70:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Langmuir I (2015) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Chem Phys 40:1361–1403Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ho YS, Huang CT, Huang HW (2002) Equilibrium sorption isotherm for metal ions on tree fern. Process Biochem 37:1421–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Safety Environment Quality Supervision and Testing Research InstituteCNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Co., LtdGuanghanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations