Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 14, pp 10130–10140 | Cite as

Controllable preparation of methyltriethoxysilane xerogel nanofibers

  • Yulong Xu
  • Ningxiao Gao
  • Yueying Gong
  • Shaosen Huo
  • Mohamedazeem M. Mohideen
  • Song Hong
  • Yong LiuEmail author


In recent years, the controllable preparation of silicone xerogel nanofiber without the addition of a carrier polymer is becoming more and more attractive. The methyltriethoxysilane (MTES) sol prepared using MTES/H2O/ethanol in a molar ratio of 1:5:6 under acidic catalysis conditions has excellent spinnability in a long span of spinning time. Further, pure silicone nanofibers with different gelation times were prepared by electrospinning. The influence of gelation time on the colloidal particle morphology and size, cross-linking degree, and viscosity of as-synthesized silicone sols was studied in depth with SEM, DLS, and ATR-FTIR, and the effects on the morphology, hydrophobicity, and thermal stability of as-prepared xerogel nanofibers were also determined. As the gel time increased, there was a higher increase in the colloidal particle size, cross-linking degree, and viscosity of sol. The xerogel nanofibers with long gelation time exhibited higher hydrophobicity and thermal stability due to sufficient hydrolysis and condensation. The optimum gelation time was approximately 200 h, and the optimum viscosity range was in between 300 and 1000 cp, which were obtained for stable fiber jet and for preparing uniform and continuous xerogel nanofibers with excellent physical and chemical properties.



This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 21374008).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3629_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1574 kb)


  1. 1.
    Li D, McCann JT, Xia YN (2006) Electrospinning: a simple and versatile technique for producing ceramic nanofibers and nanotubes. J Am Ceram Soc 89(6):1861–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gualandi C, Celli A, Zucchelli A, Focarete ML (2015) Advances in polymer science. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee C, Jo SM, Choi J, Baek KY, Truong YB, Kyratzis IL, Shul YG (2013) SiO2/sulfonated poly ether ether ketone (SPEEK) composite nanofiber mat supported proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. J Mater Sci 48:3665–3671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henry N, Clouet J, Le Visage C et al (2017) Silica nanofibers as a new drug delivery system: a study of the protein-silica interactions. J Mater Chem B 5(16):2908–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamaguchi T, Sakai S, Watanabe R, Tarao T, Kawakami K (2010) Heat treatment of electrospun silicate fiber substrates enhances cellular adhesion and proliferation. J Biosci Bioeng 109(3):304–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang X, Shao C, Zhang Z et al (2012) In situ generation of well-dispersed ZnO quantum dots on electrospun silica nanotubes with high photocatalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(2):785–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong H, Mutlu BR, Wackett LP, Aksan A (2013) In situ generation of well-dispersed ZnO quantum dots on electrospun silica nanotubes with high photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 111:234–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel AC, Li S, Wang C, Zhang W, Wei Y (2007) Electrospinning of porous silica nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles for catalytic applications. Chem Mater 19(6):1231–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu R, Jia M, Zhang Y, Li F (2012) Sorption of malachite green on vinyl-modified mesoporous poly(acrylic acid)/SiO2 composite nanofiber membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 149(1):111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lim HS, Baek JH, Park K, Shin HS, Kim J, Cho JH (2010) Multifunctional hybrid fabrics with thermally stable superhydrophobicity. Adv Mater 22(19):2138–2141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong Y, Lin H, Jin Q, Li L, Wang D, Zhou D, Qu F (2013) Synthesis of mesoporous carbon fibers with a high adsorption capacity for bulky dye molecules. J Mater Chem A 1(25):7391–7398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Yang P, Li J, Matras-Postolek K, Yue Y, Huang B (2016) Formation of SiO2@SnO2 core-shell nanofibers and their gas sensing properties. RSC Adv 6(16):13371–13376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pang Z, Nie Q, Zhu Y, Ge M, Chen M (2019) Enhanced ammonia sensing characteristics of CeO2-decorated SiO2/PANI free-standing nanofibrous membranes. J Mater Sci 54:2333–2342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu M, Kang W, Zhong Z, Cheng B, Xing W (2018) Porphyrin-functionalized hierarchical porous silica nanofiber membrane for rapid HCl gas detection. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(34):11668–11674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Textor T, Mahltig B (2008) Nanosols and textiles. World Scientific, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang JF (2005) Sol–gel principle and technology. Chemical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang C, Ozcam AE, Stout B, Khan SA (2012) Effect of pH on protein distribution in electrospun PVA/BSA composite nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 13(5):1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee SW, Kim YU, Choi Park TY, Joo YL, Lee SG (2007) Preparation of SiO2/TiO2 composite fibers by sol–gel reaction and electrospinning. Mater Lett 61(3):889–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li XH, Shao CL, Liu YC (2007) A simple method for controllable preparation of polymer nanotubes via a single capillary electrospinning. Langmuir 23(22):10920–10923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi SS, Lee SG, Im SS, Kim SH, Joo YL (2003) Silica nanofibers from electrospinning/sol–gel process. J Mater Sci Lett 22(12):891–893. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Geltmeyer J, De Roo J, Van den Broeck F, Martins JC, De Buysser K, De Clerck K (2016) The influence of tetraethoxysilane sol preparation on the electrospinning of silica nanofibers. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 77(2):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDonagh C, Bowe P, Mongey K, MacCraith BD (2002) Characterisation of porosity and sensor response times of sol–gel-derived thin films for oxygen sensor applications. J Non-Cryst Solids 306:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bredereck K, Effenberger F, Tretter M (2011) Preparation and characterization of silica aquasols. J Colloid Interface Sci 360(2):408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iimura K, Oi T, Suzuki M, Hirota M (2010) Preparation of silica fibers and non-woven cloth by electrospinning. Adv Powder Technol 21:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Freyer A, Savage NO (2014) Electrospun silica nanofiber mats: effects of sol viscosity and application to thin layer chromatography. American Chemical Society, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malay O, Yilgor I, Menceloglu YZ (2013) Effects of solvent on TEOS hydrolysis kinetics and silica particle size under basic conditions. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 67(2):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jiang H, Zheng Z, Wang X (2008) Kinetic study of methyltriethoxysilane (MTES) hydrolysis by FTIR spectroscopy under different temperatures and solvents. Vib Spectrosc 46(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sadasivan S, Dubey AK, Li Y, Abidi N, Rasmussen DH (1998) Alcoholic solvent effect on silica synthesis-NMR and DLS investigation. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 12(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chu B (1991) Laser light scattering: basic principles and practice. Academic Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang J, Chen J, Song J (2009) Studies of the surface wettability and hydrothermal stability of methyl-modified silica films by FT-IR and Raman spectra. Vib Spectrosc 50(2):178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sas I, Gorga RE, Joines JA, Thoney KA (2012) Literature review on superhydrophobic self-cleaning surfaces produced by electrospinning. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 50(12):824–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bahloul-Hourlier D, Latournerie J, Dempsey P (2005) Reaction pathways during the thermal conversion of polysiloxane precursors into oxycarbide ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 25(7):979–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electric EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations